It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
EPIC YES!!! I would die a happy man if they did that...
Been through this before and 'homages and recognition to past Bond films' for anniversary etc, but if they keep it to a minimum and not go overboard like previous I think that will be sufficient. But please, and I emplore them, no Bond girl coming out of the sea like in Doctor No, Halle Berry almost killed the series with that, it's Honey who is the star of that, it should never have been tried again, they failed dismally.. :-<
am i the only one who liked that nod to goldfinger? - i mean, if nothing else, i thought the imagery of her covered in oil, in a room decorated in black and white was pretty powerful... from a style standpoint.... anyways..
i like subtle nods - ie: the business card that Bond hands the guard in QOS has R. Sterling on it - a nod to TSWLM.... nods or homages that are a little more 'blatant' are okay, but used sparingly - as in, maybe only doing it once.... if you do it too much, it becomes distracting (i'm looking at you Lee Tamahori)
I just had a thought: would it be too much for Bond and Q (since we know Q is in this one) to have a brief scene like this : After Q explains something, Bond glances at the counter, sees a sandwich and reaches for it slightly then just brings his hand back like he's remembering the former Q (which scene is that referencing, with Pierce??) and gives the slilghtest of smiles, then moves on (no dialog about it though). I'd like something like that. It's subtle enough for me and would make me smile.
But it would imply this was not the first Q Bond has met. Would that make sense (maybe) ... he might have met Q before he became a 00.
Yes, that would be nice, too.
Yes! She is still recognizable and that would be nice for me to see, too.
Hmm. I'd like to see how creative our forum members would be for showing Lee Tamahori: In the background, like outside we see thru a cafe window - have him dragged through the streets and then lynched by a mob of Asian schoolgirls (in school uniforms)?
Or him in the background asking a policeman for directions...dressed as an asian schoolgirl ;-)
No, I appreciated the idea but like different things in QOS, it had no particular impact because Fields went from "I'm so sorry" for tripping Elvis to covered in oil. In Goldfinger you knew Oddjob was in the room. In this scene, if let's say the viewer had seen Greene sneaking up on her and later Fields in a predicament being questioned by him it would have gone a lot better. I don't want to digress any further into the QOS script deficiencies, it's an open book.
Better yet, Tamahori getting tips from Martin Campbell and the ghost of Terence Young on how to direct a Bond movie
:D
Here's the best way to pay tribute- let DC be the Bond we all know. We've got Major Boothroyd back (Wishaw will have to earn the Q moniker before I'll call him that)- no need to introduce them. It should be like they know each other already. Bond will now get gadgets again, maybe one he's used before would be a nice nod. They seem to have him involved with different women- check. If one of these actresses named is Moneypenny, same deal with Q, carry on, I just PRAY their exchanges don't resemble those of Brosnan and Sam Bond, just awful dialogue that is better suited for Austin Powers and not a Bond movie. Otherwise, I haven't given a lot of thought to the subject, most likely because of the overall result the lat time they tried to get cute about an anniversary while nearly everything else went horribly wrong.
=D> Exactly. They don't really need to throw in referrences and nods. I don't even think the DB5 should return.
That said, we already have a thread covering this and the funny thing is, @Getafix, you actually commented in that one. ;-)
Sorry folks! See you over there. ;-)