It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
If you care to actually read what I said I commented on the quality and never mentioned the box office returns. Hamiltons 3 film tenure in the 70s represents the laziest period in the series with sloppy writing and production values and everyone just getting away with the bare minimum. At first the box office held up because for DAF you had the return of Sean and for LALD you had a new (and crucially popular actor) as well. But Cubby should have spotted the overall malaise that culminated in the lacklustre TMWTGG a lot earlier and before it nearly sank the series.
Hate to break it to you but its actually a James Bond film not a George Lazenby film. How would it not make sense in a series of films with the same character to have some sort of continuity?
For someone so quick to bandy around terms like 'getting up to speed on his Bond IQ' this is risible. If I'm still having trouble getting up to speed what are you driving? A Robin Reliant?
I presume the scene in FYEO that had some bloke called Roger Moore standing at the grave of Teresa Bond left you utterly bemused?
Yes, @DC007, you are right. The scripts are so stupid they are funny! ;) They actually give me physical pains, but that's just me... :-&
I am not saying they don't have plotholes.... but they feature so many quotable one liners and cult classic scenes.... :)
Indeed, there is so much splendor in these three, you just have to let the mistakes go!
Just out of interest, what do you see as flaws in LALD?
For me, the only flaws in LALD was the PTS, it's just so boring. I'm black and tbh most of the stereotypes don't offend me, maybe if it was made today but it's an old film, and a good one.
The stereotypes in LALD are embarassing but aren't as bad as they could have been imo. Though even if they were the most offensive, with view to the movie, would they be considered a flaw/crater-size hole in the story??
Agreed. DAF, TMWTGG, YOLT, TSWLM, MR and TND are the best written Bond movies IMO. Great plots.
Not totally sure about these.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2689/controversial-opinions-about-bond-films/p34#Item_996
There are plot holes in these films, especially LALD, but all three feature some very clever writing, especially the first two. But smart writing was Tom Mank's stock in trade.
btw the hands down winner was FRWL. It was miles ahead of the next grouping of OHMSS, CR and TB which were quite close in the 2-4 spots. TLD, GF and DN, were tightly grouped in the 5-7 spots. Then there was a precipitous GE like bungy-drop to 8th place.
As a result, based on a very sizeable sample of commited Bond fans, it's also fair to say there is a distinct super-7 of Bond films, with FRWL towering above the other favoured films.
TND?!?!?
Yeah considering the script for the last half hour reads 'Bond just walks around like Arnie machine gunning anything that moves' it really is a travesty it was overlooked for best screenplay.
Classic 007RogerMoore.
Cant even be bothered to dispute DAF and TMWTGG any more.
It is.