It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Yes, at the beginning of the film before he wraps the girls bikini top around her neck.
No, it's not about confusion is it, just too many aliases maybe, not enough James Bond 007 perhaps. I don't get confused with it, just damn disappointed above all else
@Murdock Yes, you could be on to something, (in) one of the most embarrassing and cringeworthy PTS of the entire franchise. 'Where's Blofeld? - Ca-Ca-Ca-Cairo!' - damn nonsense really, and especially with one of the best and tangible James Bond's (Connery) ever, I had actually forgotten about it, you can't really blame me...
Thanks. I was just looking at the very first deliveries of "Bond, James Bond" for each actor. I will give credit to Pierce giving a pretty solid delivery of that line each time.
SC-The iconic delivery.
DC-The cold-hearted delivery
PB-The suave delivery
RM-The cookie cutter delivery
GL-The tounge in cheek delivery
TD-The throw away delivery.
Here goes. Have to disagree. I like Dalton's delivery of the line, straightforward, and not trying to imitate previous Bonds - where as Roger's, I felt, was a copy of Connery's 'Bond, (pause) James Bond' slightly tongue-in-cheek delivery, no one talks like that except in the movies. And I think Lazenby and Dalton do just fine with the line. Brosnan's 'Band, James Band' delivery in TWINE is awful and too American for me!
I certainly don't disagree with your interpretation of Dalton's and Lazenby's deliveries. As you say straightforward and not trying to imitate others. Perhaps on reflection their deliveries are the most natural. However Bond as a character for me, on occasion needs to show an element of confidence and assurance and the perfect opportunity to do so is when delivering the famous line. For me their deliveries lacked that certain assured confidence and style befitting of the character.
I think you're spot on here tbh. There's a reason people remember the line deleveries of Connery, Moore, Brosnan and Craig more than Dalts and Laz. It's because they sound a bit more fun and indulgent.
I understand what your saying, and I too don't disagree with what you are saying. And I believe that the audience was so conditioned to the Connery/Moore style of delivery that Dalton's line failed to live up to expectations. When reading the books I certainly don't have Connery/Moore delivery when that line comes up, in my head it is more like Dalton's. Maybe there is too much emphasis put on this one line…I don't know.
If someone talked to you like that in real life would you think them cool, or a bit of a prat?
If someone talked to you like that in real life would you think them cool, or a bit of a prat?
Probably a bit of a prat but it's not real life
If it were real life I would think they were a bit of a prat. However Bond is not the real world and should reflect an element of escapism within the movies. It's the element of escapism and style that is a big draw for many people. Perhaps too much emphasis is placed on the iconic Bond... James Bond line, perhaps similar to the expectations of the delivery of the other iconic shaken not stirred line.
I agree, there has to be an element of fun and indulgence and little signature moments like the delivery of the famous line can remind us we are watching a Bond movie as oppose to another similar themed movie. I love Daltons and Lazenbys performance as Bond and I enjoy the fact their movies are more serious and realistic in places, but they missed an opportunity to impress and bring the Bond style for me on the iconic line.
I've been reading the comments here with interest and I've always appreciated both Lazenby's and Dalton's deliveries of the lines. I think that both deliveries were well-thought out and intentional.
With Lazenby, he has a very genial, happy tone in the beginning of OHMSS which is in keeping with a young, attractive, successful bachelor who has the world by a string and is loving his perfect life. That was a wise choice as it makes everything that happens later on in the film darker by contrast, so I think that his chipper delivery of the line was well-played.
With Dalton, again I think it was a great choice to deliver the line as a "throw-away". It shows instantly that this is a more serious Bond who doesn't need the cheesy "tick all the boxes" moments to establish that he's Bond - and the delivery of "Bond, James Bond" was becoming cheesy and forced at the time.
There was an interview with Brosnan where he made a very good point. He said that you can over-think the iconic moments and lines to the point where they come across as un-natural and forced - it's better to just deliver them in the natural way that the character whould in each particular moment. To me, *that's* what makes the line cool. Even worse is when a director or a composer feels the need to spice things up a bit to make the moment "bigger" or more important - with OTT music or directorial choices (such as the infamous reading of the line to Christmas in TWINE).
A great post as ever TLF.
I remember hearing an interview with Broz where he said something along the lines of "keep it simple...and say the name". I suppose with Brosnan they did sound a bit cheesey and stagey sometimes but I do like his smooth voice. Same with Craig
The problem I have with Dalts is that he seemed to want to get it out of the way.
Worst – Lazenby's. PTS.
It wasn't though. It seemed like it was, but it wasn't. In QOS he still hadn't become James Bond, he'd become more experienced, but still not the Bond we know.
I think he did. He starts the story out as suave and tough, but a somewhat short tempered "blunt instrument" who can't keep the proper perspective (see the "only one bombmaker" conversation he has with M a couple scenes in).
By the end of the movie, he shown he's plenty charming and suave (see just about all the casino scenes, the train scene with Vesper, etc), he's tough as nails (the numerous fight scenes), and rather clever (breaking Le Chiffre's tell, figuring out how to get to Dimitrios and how to find Mr. White).
Finally, at the end, he's learned how to keep his cool and/or perspective, illustrated by the fact that he shoots White in the foot (if he hadn't changed, that bullet would've gone between White's eyeballs) and very cooly approaches him to "introduce himself".
So: charming, suave, tough, clever, icy cool under pressure and rather emotionally detached. Bags the babes and gets the bad guys.
Exactly what about that isn't Bond?
I hate to be a pest, but he was shot in the knee. :-B
Yes, this has been mentioned by many before. Brosnan had a nasty habit of delivering it in an annoying way.
I had no problem with any of his deliveries, except maybe the second one in the bunker in TWINE.
Why do you think it's annoying? The only time Brosnan did it badly imo was in TWINE in the bunker.
Best is still Connery, worst has to be Lazenby at the start of OHMSS.
Totally agree that Connery was the best and Lazenby the worst. Brosnan was annoying as he seemed to over act it with a level of excessive charm boardering on cheesiness.
Worste-George Lazenby (OHMSS)