›

ANOTHER NEW CANDIDATE AS A FUTURE BOND

LeChiffreLeChiffre
edited May 2012 in News Posts: 1,548
Having seen the brilliant new Avengers film last night, I couldn't help but be impressed by Tom Hiddlestone who plays the villain of the piece. Excellent actor and very charismatic and I can really see him as potential Bond post-Dan Craig, assuming Tom Hardy is unavailable!

Comments

  • forgotmyusernameforgotmyusername
    edited May 2012 Posts: 2,782
    Avengers was indeed good, your man doesn't have that x-factor i think, not enough to carry a film. Makes a good co-star. And would he make love to Greene until he begged for mercy?
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    I suggested Hiddleston already here and over at CBM.
  • danslittlefingerdanslittlefinger
    edited May 2012 Posts: 886
    Saw Eddie Redmayne recently on TV, he's been in a few things. My Week with Marilyn being the last film I think...he's quite a good actor won a few awards, stage and screen. By the time Craig steps down he'll be well seasoned in talent and looks and has that upper class face if they want to take Bond back to the old 'Etonian' look (where Eddie in fact went to school). Just a thought. I mean where else are they going to go after Craig?
    Eddie+Redmayne+set+My+Week+Marilyn+shooting+ok3McZh2XZel.jpg
  • Pierce2DanielPierce2Daniel
    Posts: 4,409
    I think the next Bond is pretty much a straight dog fight between Tom Hardy and Michael Fassbender. I for one want Hardy to be the next Bond, best actor out of England for a very long time.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    Assuming Craig is going to be around for at least another two movies, I think all speculation at this point is fairly futile. The future Bond is likely to be somone currently almost completely off the radar.
  • danslittlefingerdanslittlefinger
    Posts: 886
    Getafix wrote:
    The future Bond is likely to be somone currently almost completely off the radar.

    Most likely, someone who has had very few leading roles.

  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,718
    We are in 2012... Craig is Bond until atleast 2016 or even 2018. that means we are 4/6 years away from the choice of Bond #7. Did anyone ever consider Craig as Bond in 2001 or 1999 ? No. So fact is, we have no idea at all who will be Bond. Main contenders today may very well be over-run by someone who was a total stranger 5 years before his casting as Bond.
  • danslittlefingerdanslittlefinger
    edited May 2012 Posts: 886
    DaltonCraig007 wrote:
    We are in 2012... Craig is Bond until atleast 2016 or even 2018. that means we are 4/6 years away from the choice of Bond #7. Did anyone ever consider Craig as Bond in 2001 or 1999 ? No. So fact is, we have no idea at all who will be Bond. Main contenders today may very well be over-run by someone who was a total stranger 5 years before his casting as Bond.

    Agreed - Fassbender and Hardy in my mind, will be too well known by then. Candidates at this point are either unknown or absolutely on the periphery of minor fame.

  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    danslittlefinger wrote:
    DaltonCraig007 wrote:
    We are in 2012... Craig is Bond until atleast 2016 or even 2018. that means we are 4/6 years away from the choice of Bond #7. Did anyone ever consider Craig as Bond in 2001 or 1999 ? No. So fact is, we have no idea at all who will be Bond. Main contenders today may very well be over-run by someone who was a total stranger 5 years before his casting as Bond.

    Agreed - Fassbender and Hardy in my mind, will be too well known by then. Candidates at this point are either unknown or absolutely on the periphery of such.

    I think Fassbender will be too old as well.
  • danslittlefingerdanslittlefinger
    edited May 2012 Posts: 886
    Getafix wrote:
    danslittlefinger wrote:
    DaltonCraig007 wrote:
    We are in 2012... Craig is Bond until atleast 2016 or even 2018. that means we are 4/6 years away from the choice of Bond #7. Did anyone ever consider Craig as Bond in 2001 or 1999 ? No. So fact is, we have no idea at all who will be Bond. Main contenders today may very well be over-run by someone who was a total stranger 5 years before his casting as Bond.

    Agreed - Fassbender and Hardy in my mind, will be too well known by then. Candidates at this point are either unknown or absolutely on the periphery of such.

    I think Fassbender will be too old as well.

    Agreed. Need to look at actors who are around 30 (ish) so when Craig steps down (say in about 6 years) they should be mid late thirties to give them a good run with it.
    Example only:
    Redmayne is 30.
    Hardy is 35.
    Fassbender is also 35.

  • JWESTBROOKJWESTBROOK
    Posts: 5,745
    http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2589/who-shouldcould-be-a-bond-actor/p1
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    JWESTBROOK wrote:
    http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2589/who-shouldcould-be-a-bond-actor/p1

    I was just going to post that, thanks @JWESTBROOK.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    Thanks @JWESTBROOK.


    Locked.
This discussion has been closed.