It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I do like the "I'd stick to flying if I were you" line though as well as the "more of a problem eliminator" moment.
Oh, problem eliminator is a badass line.
Besides doesn't the same approach kind of apply to old George ;)
Why Brosnan thought that was the right image is anyone's guess. Obviously it was sanctioned and approved. That is the photo of a man who is broken easily.
But I do not think they would have used a photo like that for his casting as the Russian agent in The Fourth Protocol.
So much for the darker side of Bond being explored as he said in the GE conference. A picture is worth a thousand words.
But... the writing under the pictures is accurate I suppose...
;)
I assume it's for GE, but after he got his haircut post press conference.
*...not that I know of....
Actually, I felt TWINE got a little dark, back then... LOL, NOW I feel TWINE was just TLD-LITE.
That was a press photo to reassure that the serious approach was dead and buried.
I don't blame Pierce for that photo but I doubt he would like it either now. Especially because he was replaced by Craig who has a harder look.
I admit hindsight is a wonderful thing and I am sure if Pierce could go back in time, he would have negotiated his position better with EON in terms of script and character.
Pierce is a very fine looking man and all the more he needed to accentuate the darker persona to balance out the pretty boy image.
I admit I did enjoy Pierce's outings but with a major reservation. I always wanted him to embrace what Dalton started. And ironically had he done that and EON been smarter with his scripts, he would have stayed on as Bond until Maybe 2008 or even 2010.
Dalton was just being his 'serious actor' self... who wants a Shakespeare-level dude doing Bond anyway?
^joke
I have to be fair and say you are right. Serious actually suits Brosnan so well. And of course he has amazing photos as Bond.
Good that you do. I know Craig is the new flavour but I cannot forget how people loved Pierce in the role and sang his praises. He had an incredible image but they underused his acting sadly.
Had he had those elements of Dalton as well, he would have been getting the praise Craig is now. I mean that in a nice way to Pierce. He never saw that coming what is happening today with Bond.
I have seen it actually. Not bad.
I agree with that. Pierce ended up in the Roger Moore category, but he aimed for Connery and said so himself.
Ironically Brosnan in 1997 said Dalton was served badly by his scripts not realising he was getting ones that were underusing him. It's fine delivering a one liner, but you have to balance that out with Bond's dangerous side.
At least now Pierce has a greater understanding of why Dalton was the Bond he was.
Returning after a long absence- and the script was completely made with him in mind. Just think about M warning him about 'taking it personal' (helloooooo, Licence to Kill reference!!!!) not to mention the girl 'evaluating' him at the beginning.
Too many great moments to name!
GoldenEye should have been Dalton's last- and Tomorrow Never Dies should have been Brosnan's first.
I totally agree. Dalton deserved that swan song just as much as Craig deserved Skyfall.
Goldeneye was written for Dalton and the M scene about the dinosaur would have suited his Bond more.
Part of me is still angry about the legal dispute which means the franchise will have that missing piece for me. Brosnan would have looked the perfect age as Bond in 1997. He has a younger face.
If I am totally honest, I prefer Dalton's and Brosnan's images as Bond in terms of look to Craig. That is not shallow but how I felt always and I doubt it will change.
Craig's hair looks like Tintin's in some Skyfall scenes and is way too short. Connery had longer hair that was slicked back. Craig looked good with his initial media shots of him as Bond before filming started for CR.
I would not want to see a Bond with shaved off hair either. But it could happen if fashions permit.