The TIMOTHY DALTON Appreciation thread - Discuss His Life, His Career, His Bond Films

1181921232464

Comments

  • Getafix wrote:
    Hmmmm. I prefered the old title. This new one is a bit sterile. Daltonites don't 'appreciate', they bow down in adoration.

    No, appreciation is good enough, and see it's been extended to all the James Bond actors in recent days. Never really went for the 'Daltonites' label, despite Tim being a favorite Bond. Agree with the top of the page also, as in while both Dalton and Craig provided viewers with a darker Bond than all others, Dalton evaluated situations before making a move, while Craig maybe jumped in and appeared a little too eager to get things done

  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    edited January 2014 Posts: 7,582
    Getafix wrote:
    Hmmmm. I prefered the old title. This new one is a bit sterile. Daltonites don't 'appreciate', they bow down in adoration.

    I do see your point. I was just trying to link the six actors up with similar ongoing threads. And as this one was a healthy existing thread I thought it a good place to start. We will see how it goes :-)
    Certainly I don't want to drive the Daltonites underground ;-)
  • Pajan005Pajan005 Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts: 432
    Dalton looked like he was having fun in his films. I can see it on the way he smiles.
  • Posts: 11,425
    NicNac wrote:
    Getafix wrote:
    Hmmmm. I prefered the old title. This new one is a bit sterile. Daltonites don't 'appreciate', they bow down in adoration.

    I do see your point. I was just trying to link the six actors up with similar ongoing threads. And as this one was a healthy existing thread I thought it a good place to start. We will see how it goes :-)
    Certainly I don't want to drive the Daltonites underground ;-)

    We have been a persecuted minority for too long - but the love that dare not speak its name seems to be catching these days. Is there anyone left, apart from GL, of course, who still doesn't love the Daltonator?
  • edited January 2014 Posts: 11,189
    He's ok. I like him more than I did before. Still think I prefer several other actors overall though. You can "see" Dalton acting quite a bit in his films.
  • Posts: 11,425
    BAIN123 wrote:
    He's ok. I like him more than I did before. Still think I prefer several other actors overall though. You can "see" Dalton acting quite a bit in his films.

    That's still better than watching someone learning to act, or not really bothering to act at all, a la Brosnan!
  • edited January 2014 Posts: 11,189
    It did happen with Brosnan sometimes, who had a tendency to overact. Both had their moments though.

    The only time I don't think Brosnan really bothered to act was in the Jinx meeting scene when you could see he was thinking "sod this...I'm going to have some fun".
  • Posts: 11,425
    BAIN123 wrote:
    It did happen with Brosnan sometimes, who had a tendency to overact. Both had their moments though.

    Any way, glad to hear that you're gradually warming to the Daltonator. May be with time you'll come to appreciate his true genius! ;)
  • edited January 2014 Posts: 11,189
    I do like Dalton, I just wonder whether the likes of Connery and Craig are better at the more serious Bond. Dalton (at times at least) seemed a bit too dramatic for me.
  • edited January 2014 Posts: 11,425
    I have always felt that there is a basic misconception about Dalton - that he was the 'serious' Bond. I've said it before, but Dalton is quoted as saying that he wanted his third film to be a lot more lighthearted. I even think he's said that he prefers TLD to LTK,. TLD is, to be frank, not that different in tone from some of the Moore films and has a very nuanced and varied performance by Dalton. Certainly Dalton brought a bit more realism back in terms of his portrayal, but I really think the idea that we was this sour faced missery of a Bond just doesn't stand up to the facts. He knew that the success of the films was down to a mixture of high drama and lighter moments, and TLD is (IMO) an almost perfect blend of these essential Bond flavours.
  • edited January 2014 Posts: 11,189
    I think its fair to say that Dalton was a more dramatic actor than Moore - and that showed in his performances. Where Moore was portraying an "old pro" sort of spy who viewed his job as a bit of an adventure, Dalton was more cynical. He had some good lighter moments but overall I WOULD say he was more sour faced than Rog.

    I know Dalton has gone on record as saying that LTK was "too grim" but I think his third film - had it happened - would have retained the idea of a more ruthless Bond albeit in a slightly less brutal way. That was what Dalton wanted when he started after all.
  • Pajan005Pajan005 Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts: 432
    It's Timothy Dalyon's birtday today. Congrats! Hope he has a good time.

    If you go to wikipedia it says he was born either 1944 or 1946. Anyone knows which is the real year he was born?
  • SandySandy Somewhere in Europe
    Posts: 4,012
    Happy Birthday Tim!
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Tim Rules.
    Happy one dude.
  • Posts: 11,425
    The Dalton detractors always insist that he jumped before he was pushed, but in this interview he actually claims EON were pushing for him to commit to a 4th film, and that was one of the reasons he quit:

    Credited with saving 007 from the self-parody of the Roger Moore years, he took the decision to quit after the preproduction of his third Bond film was halted for five years by litigation. 'I only wanted to do one Bond movie in the first place, but they insisted that I sign for three. By the time the lawsuit was resolved, I'd been Bond for nine years. They asked if I'd stay and do another.

    'Part of me, having done two which had good and bad things about them, wanted to do a third to see if I could do one that brought everything together. But they wanted me to sign for more than one so I said, "No". I knew I'd made the right decision, but there was this little feeling of territoriality, until I was driving one day in Los Angeles.

    http://www.timothy-dalton.com/2013/07/great-interview-from-dalton-in-british.html

    Would be interesting to have EON's side of the story.
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 12,837
    Interesting how he only wanted to make one film in the first place. He seems like one of those actors that picks work that interests him rather than what would make him the most money.

    He could've easily carried on as Bond until the late 90s and made millions, but he wanted to move on and do something new. Fair play to him, but I really wish he'd done at least one more.

    That interviews a bit iffy though. He was Bond for nine years? He became Bond in 1986, after Roger left, and it was 1994 when the legal stuff was sorted and he stepped down, so that'd be 8 years. And he didn't drive an Aston Martin? What about in TLD?
  • edited March 2014 Posts: 11,425
    Interesting how he only wanted to make one film in the first place. He seems like one of those actors that picks work that interests him rather than what would make him the most money.

    He could've easily carried on as Bond until the late 90s and made millions, but he wanted to move on and do something new. Fair play to him, but I really wish he'd done at least one more.

    I wish he'd had better career advice! He turned down Bond to do what exactly? He's barely worked since. And what he has done has been mainly garbage.

    I sometimes think he comes across as deluded.

    Great Bond, but slightly odd character.

    What is he doing sitting there in LA, a city he doesn't seem to have any obvious affection for. It just doesn't suit him, while he craves to work more in the UK. He's unmarried, discovered the joys of fatherhood late, but (as far as I can tell) has never lived with his son. It all sounds a bit sad.

    He should have matured into one of the great elder statesmen of stage and screen - a Patrick Stewart or Ian Mckellen, but instead he seems to mope around not doing very much. You get the sense that he only very belatedly realised what a good thing he was onto with Bond - you don't feel he ever really enjoyed it - 'being Bond'. Which is a shame.

    I think DC started off the same way - slightly wary of the stardom - but has grown into it and clearly enjoys the role and the kudos and opportunities it brings.

  • edited March 2014 Posts: 12,837
    Getafix wrote:
    Interesting how he only wanted to make one film in the first place. He seems like one of those actors that picks work that interests him rather than what would make him the most money.

    He could've easily carried on as Bond until the late 90s and made millions, but he wanted to move on and do something new. Fair play to him, but I really wish he'd done at least one more.

    I wish he'd had better career advice! He turned down Bond to do what exactly? He's barely worked since. And what he has done has been mainly garbage.

    He's been in some good stuff since then (Hot Fuzz for example). Sure he's not had the success Sean and Pierce have had (Connery became one of the most successful actors ever and Brosnan's best work has been post Bond), but he's certainly done more than Moore and Lazenby did once they left.

    He hasn't been in much since but he's hardly struggling is he. He's still a millionaire. Like I said, I think he just chooses work that interests him.
  • Posts: 11,425
    May be. I think he lost his way.

    Sure he's rich, but he also seems bored/directionless.

    He could have had the pick of great parts, but blew it.
  • Posts: 4,408
    I remember an interview with Dalton at the time TLD was filming. He made a comment that he found it odd that one actor had to play Bond for a number of years before being succeeded by another actor. He thought that numerous actors should have been allowed to play the character film by film and give their take on it. I think Dalton mentioned that numerous actors around London give their own individual performance of Hamlet every night so why should Bond be different.

    I see his point but it would fly in the face of what Cubby Broccoli and co built in 1962 onwards. Bond is an institution and this idea may have cheapened its brand, but it would mean there would be plenty of experimental Bond movie one-offs. Maybe a version staring Daniel Day-Lewis or Leonardo Dicaprio directed by Martin Scorcese? A version starring Michael Fassbender directed by Quentin Tarantino? Maybe even Ralph Fiennes in a Wes Anderson Bond movie?

    I think had Dalton committed in 1995 the producers and the studio would not have wanted a one-picture deal as they were attempting to rebuild the Bond brand. If the film was a hit and Dalton left the part they would have been left in a pickle. Not to different to the situation Doctor Who was in after Christoper Ecclestone left after one series. It made business sense for them to get whatever actor playing Bond in GE to make a long-term commitment.

  • edited March 2014 Posts: 12,837
    Getafix wrote:
    Sure he's rich, but he also seems bored/directionless.

    We're basing this off interviews and his acting career though. We don't know what his private life is like. How do we know he's bored? For all we know he could be having the time of his life off camera.

    I do agree that he could've gotten more/better work if he'd stayed on as Bond but I don't think he cares. He even says in that interview that looking back on his life, he wouldn't change anything.
  • Posts: 11,425
    I remember an interview with Dalton at the time TLD was filming. He made a comment that he found it odd that one actor had to play Bond for a number of years before being succeeded by another actor. He thought that numerous actors should have been allowed to play the character film by film and give their take on it. I think Dalton mentioned that numerous actors around London give their own individual performance of Hamlet every night so why should Bond be different.

    I see his point but it would fly in the face of what Cubby Broccoli and co built in 1962 onwards. Bond is an institution and this idea may have cheapened its brand, but it would mean there would be plenty of experimental Bond movie one-offs. Maybe a version staring Daniel Day-Lewis or Leonardo Dicaprio directed by Martin Scorcese? A version starring Michael Fassbender directed by Quentin Tarantino? Maybe even Ralph Fiennes in a Wes Anderson Bond movie?

    I think had Dalton committed in 1995 the producers and the studio would not have wanted a one-picture deal as they were attempting to rebuild the Bond brand. If the film was a hit and Dalton left the part they would have been left in a pickle. Not to different to the situation Doctor Who was in after Christoper Ecclestone left after one series. It made business sense for them to get whatever actor playing Bond in GE to make a long-term commitment.

    If what he is saying is true - that EON wanted him to commit to at least another one after his third, then it scotches althouth anti-Dalton claims that he was given the push. And like you say, if he wouldn't commit to a fourth, it made sense for EON to recast, otherwise the work done on reestablishing the series after the long gap would have to start all over again with the next movie.

    I like the idea of one off Bonds with different directors and actors. Would be very cool.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Dalton was more a Theater actor. that's where his passion is.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    I don't like the idea of one actor, one film. That would be too unstable, it's better for an actor to stay for a number of films. Though I can't imagine Tim staying for more than 4... ok, 5 maximum.
  • Posts: 11,425
    May be 6?
  • Posts: 11,425
    Murdock wrote:
    Dalton was more a Theater actor. that's where his passion is.

    So why hasn't he been doing more stage work? What was he last in? The Golden Compass or something like that?
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Getafix wrote:
    Murdock wrote:
    Dalton was more a Theater actor. that's where his passion is.

    So why hasn't he been doing more stage work? What was he last in? The Golden Compass or something like that?

    I don't know, I'm not a groupie.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    Getafix wrote:
    May be 6?

    If he did 5, and EON had Casino Royale to dangle in front of him, then I think he'd make a 6th, otherwise no.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Getafix wrote:
    What was he last in? The Golden Compass or something like that?

    That was Craig.
    Tim was last seen in CHUCK, and an amazing performance it was!
  • Posts: 11,425
    chrisisall wrote:
    Getafix wrote:
    What was he last in? The Golden Compass or something like that?

    That was Craig.
    Tim was last seen in CHUCK, and an amazing performance it was!

    I meant on the stage. I think he did the Dark Marerials trilogy at the NT a decade ago.
Sign In or Register to comment.