It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I like Dalts but no. Just no.
DAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!
Dalton's very dramatic in the film. His facial expressions, his movements. Everything! He's good though.
The film also has Julian Glover in it and the opening titles were designed by Maurice Binder.
A darn good Bond.
God this looks painfully bad.
It's amazing really that he made such a good Bond.
Age helped I think. He was right to reject the part in his twenties
Does anyone happen to have high quality promotional stills from The Rocketeer featuring Tim Dalton's character, Neville Sinclair?
...but with higher quality, of course.
Remove the moustache, and that could pass for Daltons waiting for Dent/Paris moment.
@0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 is MY superhero, so get in the line! ha ha ha....
And let's throw this very important and necessary message into this post, because it's paramount and has to be repeated regularly.
DALTON RULEZ™
As much as I hold Moore and Connery as my prime Bonds, followed closely by Brosnan, sometimes I think Timothy Dalton is the perfect James Bond. Head to toe.
Dalton just happens to be the most perfect :P
He looked so pitch perfect for the role. A shame he lacked the rest that is needed.
Make that a Hell, no! What a ridiculous idea
That's not controversial here. I like Dalton best, straight up. I like the other Bonds in certain films, but Dalton just is my #1 Bond.
Dalton would only have come back in an official film, he had to much respect for the films and the Broccoli family to make a poor mans Bond film.
I can't see that happening for 2 reasons, 1) Daltons closeness to the Broccoli family, and 2) as we are told often enough by those who don't like Dalton, he didn't have the same pull with the public as the other Bonds had.
That's how I see it as well.
It is painfully clear that the general public lost interest in Bond during the 80s.
No one could have made bigger BO with TLD and LTK. It wasn't because of Dalton.
Dalton just happened to be there at the end of an era. In some way MGM's problems by the end of the 80s were a Godsend for the franchise.
Because after 6 years GoldenEye renewed the franchise in a way it would not have been possible with films still coming out every second year, imho.
TIMOTHY DALTON would have been THE Bond had he had the luck to get five films or even more. I strongly believe that.
Interesting. I heard that McClory had considered Lazenby if Connery had not done NSNA. And now Dalton for a further re-make. One wonders why McClory, a thorn in Eons side for so long, still had no imagination of his own and would happily employ Eon's own actors.
And I agree Dalton, like Moore before him, was loyal to Eon.