It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
IIRC they purposely never showed his hand so you can't tell...much like how the top wobbles but they don't show it falling over (which some people have told me that they remember seeing!). They mostly* kept that scene ambiguous.
I bought Inception a while back and was surprised that it wasn't as fun during its second viewing. Everything is so well laid out that there was nothing new to discover the second time around. Still a very enjoyable puzzle of a film though.
* I read an interview with a key person from the film's production and he confirmed that despite the obvious clues being absent there is indeed a different one that confirms whether or not Cobb is dreaming in that final scene.
I was going to mention it but then thought maybe I shouldn't in case anyone wanted to try to find it. I assumed that it would be common knowledge - surely the "solution" must have made its way around the net as soon as that interview was published. It was something that I never noticed myself until it was brought to my attention.
That's how it is: some people say it's this and he did it because of this, and some people will disagree. The film is ambiguous for a reason: Nolan wants us to bicker, debate, and fight over it. If he wanted us to know whether he is in the dream world or reality, he would have shown us.
Yes, and then there was that interview that I read:
So even though Nolan wanted it ambiguous for the audience according to this interview he always knew the "true" meaning of the final scene and shared it with the production staff.
Now, I don't remember exactly where it's at in the film, but the only part that ever made me question the ending's 'reality' validity was when Dom and his team go underground, and they see all of the older people hooked up to machines for their dreams, so he tries it out. When he wakes up, he goes to the bathroom to spin his top, sees Mal, and before it stops spinning, it falls on the ground on accident. When he goes to respin it, he gets interrupted, so he doesn't give the chance to.
I just think Nolan had this scene exactly for that: make people definitely question from there on out whether he makes it out in the end or not.
YES!!!
Anyway, I like to think that it was real. I'm don't know if it was or wasn't but I like to think that the film had a happy ending.
Yep. Seems like the sort of thing he would do.
Lol! Ok i will give it a go ASAP.
Where was the CGI, aside from the city bending in on itself?
But, I'm curious as to why @SaintMark thought the film was filled with CGI, when I can recall only one instance. Granted, it's been a while, but what else? It was the giant water scene in the beginning that filled Cobb's dreams, because they used giant water cannons for that. It wasn't the spinning hallway scene, because they created a hallway that spun with the camera, and it wasn't the debris explosion scene with Cobb and Ariadne, because they threw and detonated items and used big fans to blow all the debris around them and the coffee table.
Like Nolan was leadng us down a foggy lane, just showing us enough for us to want to debate it ... keep talking about it ... relive it. A memorable film, which is what any filmmaker wants. I love the action sequences in this and the score really fits the action, just driving you along with it. Love the snow scenes, etc. ... so many etcs. One of my favorite films of the past 10 years for sure.
Whatever CGI was there it never bothered me or intruded upon my enjoyment of the film. I think the long view of the Japanese castle was CGI, Paris upending and folding onto itself, and some other effects - the world Cobb built with Mal from scratch where they spent 50 years together. I am no expert so I am just guessing. Doesn't matter to me as the overall effect was stunning and fit the story, in my opinion.
No CGI there, the others, I am unsure.
For me the ending was in the reality and not a dream. Great ending!