It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
i mean i count Everything or Nothing canon and John Cleese stated that it indeed was canon
It was to boost his, at the time, failing career. He needed a hit and this film was it.
sure it's fun and entertaining sometimes and has a young Kim Basinger but is that really enough. There are only a handful of scenes that are worthwhile and it all gets a bit dull towards the end. If I wanted to watch it again it would be mainly to see Carrera and Basinger again, the former arguably the best non official Bond girl
You are so right. We "count" NSNA and CR as "Bond films" but we do not add them to the EON count, so yes, Skyfall is officially Bond 23. IMO [img][/img]
When you watch all the films in order, rank the series, or discuss any film on the board, Never Say Never Again never comes up, rightfully, because it isn't a part of the series, just some one-off film that only has to weight to it due to Connery. It can happily sit alongside Casino Royale '67 in my opinion. Indeed Connery did six films.
Depends on how we count the films. I would count NSNA before CR (1967) now that is rarely ever mentioned and should be forgotten.
NSNA does contain some of the elements of Bond films:
diabolical plot
larger than life villians
hot women
briefing from M
scenes with Q
These elements make it a James Bond movie.
Casino Royale 67 does not contain the formaliac elements and we should not count it. But it should be okay to count NSNA though most of the time we choose to leave it out.
BTW how many brands of Sherlock Holmes have been done since the 1920's? and do they all count as Sherlock Holmes films? Same can be said for Tarzan, Frankenstein, Robin Hood and any other fictional hero or monster. Universal's Frankenstein in 1931 counts as a frankenstein film so does hammer's Horror of Frankenstein in the 1950's. Different studios and crews but same character (Frankenstein).
So I guess this should apply to NSNA as well.
What say you ?
Could you please use punctuations, @Char35t? It makes reading your posts a lot easier for the lot of us. Thank you.
Pretty much sums it up.
Anyway NSNA, cheap dud.
It is a funny review though. I probably would have hated the film much more if I hadnt seen the revie b4 hand.
Here's the NSNA one too:
I remember it all very well.Connery's camp were indeed thinking that they would beat OP due to Connery being the original Bond,especially as Moore had all but retired from the role.
However,EON,realising that a new actor might make it more difficult for OP to beat NSNA,talked Moore round and brought him back for a 'battle of the Bonds' as they called it.
I only watched OP as it was the official one ( i was 13 at the time) and OP beat NSNA finishing off any attempts to scupple OP at the box office by Connery,McClory and the other cronies involved in the spoof.
I believe it was expected to be at least as successful if not more so. Simply because Connery was back and the media was always pro Connery and anti-Moore. How could it be any other way?
When OP was more successful I think the hacks simply disappeared under a stone somewhere
I did enjoy the film though!
TB is a better film and NSNA has an awful score but I enjoy it and rank above some of the EON movies.
When you watch NSNA, forget TB and forget all the legal issues. It makes it more enjoyable.
Blasphemy! TB is a classic, superbly made.
It's not just the name James Bond. It's Sean Connery as James Bond. The difference is huge!
Also, perhaps you should watch CR67 before knocking it down so ruthlessly. ;-)