It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
So, Craig 44 years of age now, right?, I see no reason why he can't go on for another 2 or 3 releases as Bond and keep up his good work. I surely don't see a repeat of Moore and a Bond film at 57 or anything, but he is able, efficient and capable for a while longer to play Bond. I estimate after Skyfall, he will remain with us for another two releases at least, I am looking forward to it. And if this thread is to be believed, then Craig peaked at Casino Royale, but I expect him to go even better this year with Skyfall, but that's not to say it will be the end. I am content enough so long as Daniel Craig is Bond
For me he is is a great bond and the fact that he isnt as suave and manicured as the others works great for his portrayl of the character.
I certainly dont think he has 8 bond films in him though. I dont think any actor that takes the role at 38 would have. I think five is a much more realistic target. Heck they might even bring the fact that he is getting older into the storylines as these are a different narrative to what has gone on before. They could even potentially kill of Craig's Bond and just reboot again.
Yes so for me, no way to 8 but I would feel very sad if he leaves after Skyfall. Craig still has much more to give...
@0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 as long as Craig doesnt go orange by his last film like poor roger then I'll be happy
@007RogerMoore I cant wait to see that how that scene plays out. Gave me shivers that part.
I agree. Most of the trailer actually gave me shivers. I think we are up for something very good. It will be interesting to see a "classic" portrayal from Craig.
Dont get too excited. There might be a few more oneliners, Q, and vodka martinis but don't expect MR.
It will be Craig business as usual. Thank god.
I love this stuff. I like that they keep things like these but modernize them, instead of copying other franchises altogether.
Atleast it will probably be a step in the right direction. And if the movie is much like the trailer I will be happy.
Second me for hoping we'll never see the likes of a Bond film such as MR, or DAD for that matter. Returning Bond to being Bond and giving Craig the same chances everyone else had with the usual elements is the right thing to do.
Note to EON- PLEASE do not bring back Moneypenny unless you plan to do the right thing there too.
And I hope they dont make Eve from SF Moneypenny at the end.
But younger, geekier Q looks good
I don't care who plays Moneypenny in the future, as long as she loses her potty mouth of the prior era. If I had a choice, I'd like Romola Garai. Blonde, cute, and I could see her flirting with some class.
I hope word gets around as Romola Garai is the ideal choice for Moneypenny.
Yeah during the Olympics segment with the queen, he looked just like he did in CR
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/news/a400271/daniel-craig-lets-us-into-bonds-inner-life-says-barbara-broccoli.html
I think the need to praise Daniel is sort of a defence reaction. Kinda like "well he may not be the ideal casting but he's good enough so fans should stop complaining." That's the vibe I get from her comments but other fans may disagree.
Well, Dalton and Brosnan were a lot about inner conflicts and anxieties.
Yeah, right, that´s why he married Tracy then. This is the same bs the producers were talking when they made CR, pointing out that CR the novel would be Bond´s first mission as a double-oh, when in fact the book gives no clear indication at all.
The whole article reads as if wildly quoted out of context, so I find it hard to interpret much into it at all. Not to mention that no indication is given when or where she said those things. Could have been a year ago, or after the release of CR.