It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
A lot of it is the culture war stuff; stoking division over diversity and women. It's all rather horrible.
These articles and videos are wishful thinking on their part because they want to be able to complain and not to mention the fact that the clicks on those complaints pay their bills.
100%. Being extremist one way or another is sadly what’s popular now.
What does "Mary Sue types like Rey Skywalker" mean ? There must be at least two references in here, and I do not follow or understand either.
In a nutshell, a Mary Sue character means a character that is *too* perfect, and Rey is the lead protagonist of the newest Star Wars trilogy. The reason that would be “woke” or undesirable is that she isn’t a relatable character; her lack of flaws makes her a bad example of female empowerment.
And what... is that?
Do I need to spoiler tag these?
The second image need's sorting which i am sure they will.
Dial of Destiny....sounds like a story that needs a Maytag repairman more than Indy Jones.
By the way - I guess no students will be batting their messaged-eyelids at Professor Jones at this point, but another professor or an administrator could do it, even as a joke, such as if they knew what happened years ago and were telling the professor, essentially, "you've still got it, Doc."
Yeah, niggles aside, it looks brilliant doesn't it?
Indy riding a horse through the subway. That's just so right!
I guess both my wife and I (plus our two cats) think we'd rather wait until the final version comes out before we cast a final vote on this.
Doesn't look half bad. I do miss the grain on the old ones. This digital age isn't doing anything for me, film wise. Nor are all of those special effects and fake explosions. I won't go into this one filled with confidence, though, as the last one made me sick for months until I could stream it out of my system with a good dosage of the original trilogy on repeat.
But I'll give it the chance it deserves, that's for sure. Next year is building up to be a fun one, with this and M:I-DR(P1). I do wish some group of geniuses would start making great cinema again, though, as frontrunners of their own manifest. Do people like that still exist?
Anyway, I'm all for hope. So, here's hoping.
Of course that is fair. However, I can't deny the excitement I feel. And there's very few properties left that can elicit such a reaction from me.
As @mtm says, it feels right!
I guess it was futile to expect them to make it look like a movie shot in 1981.