It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
You don't need Aliens or bad CGI.
And there move the goal posts.
Listen, Deke, I'm not gonna go on and on, about this here. Especially since you're shuffling goalposts around.
You can reach out to me via PM, although it's clear you won't (I've offered three times today, and several times before), since you need an audience.
My god, contact me and I'll give you my cell and we can have a video call, but stop cluttering this thread as you leapfrog from one thing to the other.
In fact, if you want a video call, that'd be best since I can keep you focused and we can tackle one issue at a time.
If you don't wanna do this, then just, move on from me, man. We've hit the point of stupidity and ridiculousness.
But, if you seriously want to have a discussion, then PM me, and we'll arrange a video call (I'll send you a zoom link).
Remember this.
I have nothing more to add on the subject. I said this from the beginning.
Have a nice day. No hard feelings
Same goes for NSNA, though that is an inferior film on nearly every single level and one that I do not enjoy as much as Dial Of Destiny (if the comparison even matters).
More Bond over less Bond, every time.
It's never been expressed any better than this.
Absolutely!!! There are no bad Indy or Bond movies only ones you love or don't. Well, okay, Moonraker....
I like Octopussy enough but it's a Moore movie. NSNA is Goldfinger-esque and I'm not going to pretend now that I don't like the first James Bond movies.
Is NSNA perfect? No, but It does many things the right way. It is a good comeback and a good send off, better than YOLT and DAF.
I don't hate the last Indiana Jones movies but they can't do their job. They can't update the formula.
Back to Indy, DoD is a much better film than its predecessor.
At least the feel of DoD was better and had a better story. I thought it was a decent end for Indy, but in truth LC was the better end for the character.
It's more like...the Guy Hamilton's movies. The post-TSPWLM movies are quite different.
The tone is like an alternative sequel to Goldfinger, something that DAF tried to be.
Worse still they’re rehashed jokes from Porridge.
Nah, DAF exists.
Correct. Also: pee jokes, and Bond going "oooooh" while diving off a cliff atop a horse. I'll take OP's gorilla suit over that any day.
I agree. While I don't hate KOTKS, it bet hard on Shia -- whom I generally really like! -- pulling off the Mutt character, and that character simply didn't click with me. PWB, on the other hand, did. Seeing her and Indy on their journey together put a smile on my face.
You guys are so funny...
Yes, Shia blew it in real life with his comments about Spielberg. PWB was fun, I wish that Marion, Short Round and Sallah would have been on the journey with them. Would have been a more satisfying conclusion for the world of Indiana Jones. I actually hope that PWB gets to write a book on both Indy and Helena, either together or separate stories.
Also, the moment in TLC when Henry Sr. thinks Indy is gone is exceptionally powerful. We know that Indy isn't dead, but that doesn't take anything away from Connery's acting. And when Indy shows up again, and Henry says, "I thought I'd lost you, boy," I can't help myself. Tears form in my eyes, instantly. Nothing in Skull came close to this intensely emotional scene. Absolutely nothing. The Mutt/Indy relationship never mirrors the Indy/Henry relationship. Many missed opportunities, if you ask me.
That’s fair. I think that might be why he bad mouthed the movie. It was a mixture of his ego and the final quality of the movie. When you bad mouth Spielberg, you don’t recover easily. I hope PWB doesn’t make the same mistake! Honestly, the first half of Crystal Skull is great, in my opinion. Particularly the warehouse fight scene.
They also just hadn't worked out what story they wanted to tell with Indy and his son. With Crusade they had a pretty simple but very strong story of illumination between the two of them, with the wonderful "Indiana, give me your hand" moment at the end, but with Mutt they just never had a clear story they wanted to tell. They meet, pretty much get on well, find out they're related, continue to get on pretty well. It's not a story.
Indy and Helena, on the other hand, have a much more interesting relationship which actually grows from her effectively conning and stealing from him, to the point you (well, I) believe her when she's crying and trying to save him on that hillside at the climax. DOD has its issues, but in terms of telling a story about the characters I think it does a fantastic job and stands alongside the original in that respect.
It's too bad that Shia wasn't on good terms, having his character in DOD might have helped add to the story and have an arc for him. Like Garfield appearing in No Way Home allowed his Peter to get an arc of some kind and be redeemed.
Garfield was in No Way Home? Just when I thought the MCU couldn’t stop with the pop culture references, lol.
Seriously, though, there is a good movie in Indy 4, some minor things would need to be changed.
I joke about Andrew Garfield by the way.
IMHO, those first three were unbelievably good. KOTCS was just a fun re-visit. DOD was where s**t got real. Not so much fun (and definitely NOT the best movie), but realistically aging Indy. I am amazed they did it at all, much less that they were able to tell such a serious tale of a once great & adventurous man living life just counting down the days to his end. And then finding a momentary purpose again, and THEN finding the ultimate reason to really be back. It still shakes me to my core thinking about it. Only a cameo by Short Round would have made it better.... someday DOD will widely be considered an excellent film. *Remembers the reviews for Blade Runner in 1982*
They have to discover it soon because CGI ages quickly. Xena: Warrior Princess looks better than this.
But the last two movies, and really, Crystal Skull in particular, I think have to be enjoyed if only for Harrison Ford's performance. I can't think of any other occasion where an actor (twice!) returned to a part after an extended break and perfectly recaptured the character while accounting for all the time that had passed in the performance. You'd think Harrison had been playing Indy in his free time between 1989 and 2008, and then again for the past 15 years. It's incredible work.
He clearly has a special love of the character, because I didn't get that vibe with Deckard and Han.
I agree.
💯 … it’s a quality flick and a great book end to the series.
https://www.instagram.com/barndogart/p/C9c4SxvuZXG/
https://www.instagram.com/barndogart/p/C8m5rPxu05A/
https://www.instagram.com/barndogart/p/C_LlPQSxXcU/
Ahaha these are fun, 😂!!