It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I just took yet another look at this scene and although the glow off the sunny bits is still present, it looks vastly lower key to my eyes. I had to look for it as opposed to having it in my face.
Yeah that's what I meant by the light bloom: I guess it was probably something created by the lenses so is part of the original image.
But doesn't it look less intrusive to you without the yellow digital wash?
Yeah, a little glow has that effect, but on my BD it's overkill.
I think so, I haven't watched them side by side so hard to say.
I agree with you on CS. It is so interesting. It has great ideas.
The last two, ahhh, there's my rub. They are like pendulum swings. Where Crystal Skull gets arguably too lighthearted, Dial Of Destiny gets arguably too depressing.
I just got the 4K of Crystal Skull which has been for me up until now the ugliest Jones movie of the bunch, and suddenly it looks fabulous, like I'm seeing it for the first time. And suddenly, I'm in love with it, fridge fly & all.
[Spoilers follow]
Dial Of Destiny is recent, and I saw it twice theatrically and once on my very pretty Blu Ray, and I find myself not loving the idea that Mutt had to be dead to divide Indy & Marion and set up the whole thrust of the 'depressive mode'. Yes, it gave Ford an amazingly effective scene on the boat with 'Wombat', but it makes me realize something....
Ford said that the character of Indy would die with him. Well, I believe that Spielberg is as important as Ford is to an Indy movie. As silly as some moments in Crystal Skull were, it was still an Indiana Jones movie to me. James Mangold, on the other hand, gave me a painful deconstruction of the character Ford & Spielberg created. So, Crystal Skull is better than Dial of Destiny.
This is, of course, just my opinion.
And I will, of course, cover my heart. B-)
Unlike the Bond movies we have a small pool from which to choose our favourites. Any ranking is therefore reasonably justified. No Indy film ever had a 'Moonraker'.... lol.
You be surprised to know Moonraker in my number 2 favorite Bond film of the 25 and I def like it better than Indy DoD, ToD, and KOTCS
We all have our favourites! For many reasons. It's all good!
I heard that Lucas and Spielberg wanted to make another prequel with Phoenix as Young Indy. Apparently, this was after Young Indy was cancelled, but unfortunately River Phoenix passed away. It is a shame that we didn't get to see more of River Phoenix as Indy, in general.
It sounds like a lot of the better ideas of TLC honestly came from Jeffrey Boam and Tom Stoppard. It's a shame that Jeffrey Boam passed away so young. He was a great screenplay writer. He did The Dead Zone, (one of Stephen King's best adaptations), and helped make the Lethal Weapon series funnier. I know he did a story draft of Indy 4 in the 90's, but then Independence Day (1996) came out, and Spielberg said no. The long story development continued. It's also a shame that Tom Stoppard wasn't credited for his work. He also helped Lucas on Star Wars Episode 3: Revenge of the Sith (as did Spielberg, for a lot of the final fight scenes). Screenplay writing and credits are a truly unique thing.
https://www.gamesradar.com/games/action/indiana-jones-and-the-great-circle-was-successful-enough-that-disney-reportedly-picked-up-the-phone-and-wants-more/
Maybe this will be the way that the next generation will get to experience Indiana Jones. It arguably may be the better way, than recasting the role. He's really a timeless character.
He did a good job of getting the Ford mannerisms down. So even though there was no physical resemblance we could see Indy in his portrayal.
I may come to a dramatic reversal and rediscover them in the coming year(s), who can tell. Ever in motion are we....
Happy New Year!
Oh, I'll probably come back to both once the pain is dulled by time. OHMSS was like that for me...
New Year now in Europe....
There’s a great website which documents all the additions and changes Stoppard made and they were pretty revelatory. Like Boam had Henry calling Indy Junior all the way through, but Stoppard added the climax where he finally calls him Indy: which in retrospect seems kind of obvious and makes the whole thing work.
Happy New Year! Thank you for the info @mtm Stoppard really should have been credited. Later this year, (hopefully) there will be a new History of Indiana Jones book. It has been delayed more than once, probably due to DOD not doing as well as they thought.
https://www.amazon.com/Its-Not-Years-Mileage-Definitive/dp/B0B8BG696Q/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=0mqoW&content-id=amzn1.sym.255b3518-6e7f-495c-8611-30a58648072e:amzn1.symc.a68f4ca3-28dc-4388-a2cf-24672c480d8f&pf_rd_p=255b3518-6e7f-495c-8611-30a58648072e&pf_rd_r=Y7GZEBJX28NF08M047QP&pd_rd_wg=17BhK&pd_rd_r=03383777-182b-485c-a85c-414cfb9a6e67&ref_=pd_hp_d_atf_ci_mcx_mr_ca_hp_atf_d
I agree. They are truly entertaining, with great action scenes. That's all I honestly can ask for.
I agree but I wish that both men would have done one more film sometime before their last film.
Not to mention the other Bond alumni. And they left an actual Bond movie in the dust at the box office.
The movie you are referring to was too ahead of its time.
True. But its successors often overuse it in the wrong ways. As for Indy, I do hope that a TV show, or relaunch of the books is being considered. Indiana Jones is too good to be just sat on for just one movie or video game.