It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I doubt it, in this era, digital de-aging is the way to go.
Harrison Ford clearly is in 1st, b 1942
Coming close behind is Samuel L, Jackson, b. 1948
Next comes Sigourney Weaver, b. 1949
I give her full credit for still making action films, particularly since I sometimes read of her being brought in for another Alien film.
Sometimes noted for his age while still making action films, but coming with a birth year 10 years subsequent to Mister First Place, is Liam Neeson, b. 1952
Clint Eastwood 1930 (next film: Cry Macho)
Sylvester Stallone 1946
Arnold Schwarzenegger 1947
For those of you trying to keep track:
1930 Client Eastwood, who just hit his 91st birthday
1937 Morgan Fairchild
1942 Harrison Ford
1945 Helen Mirren
1946 Sylvester Stallone
1947 Arnold Schwarzenegger
1948 Samuel L. Jackson
1948 Sigourney Weaver
1952 Liam Neeson
[url="[youtube]
I was looking through some other of Mangold's movies I own like Night and Day (Tom cruise) and Identity (John Cusack), two films I have a lot of time for. Mangold is a very skilled director, I am confident we will get some iconic Indy shots and cinematography.
Ford vs Ferrari is the one that really bolsters my confidence in Mangold; the cinematography is gorgeous and he beautifully captures the 60’s era.
Still not had chance to watch F vs F, its on my watch list. It looks stunning based on the trailers I have seen.
It’s funny I never saw Logan but I did see Night and Day (because I was told if the film did well enough we would get mission impossible 4 so I did my part) it was a fun action film not amazing not bad
I saw identity and own it. While I have heard many reviewers claim it’s bad I actually enjoy it as a slasher version of And then there were none.
So I think he will do well my concern for the film is still the same though the item Indy is after has to be good and I swear I am not playing my own hand of beliefs but it should be a judeo-Christian artifact as even atheists on this forum have said Indy sucks when he goes after non judeo-Christian artifacts…
My honest hope is The Garden of Eden though some my feel that is a little too close to last crusade…. Aaron’s staff might be cool but that might be to similar to raiders
Like I said currently I will still see it in theaters but like crystal skull I am nervous
Good spot: it sounds plausible. Cumbria is very beautiful- didn’t they use it in Force Awakens too?
I wonder if they’re maximising their time filming in the U.K. due to covid? I’d be a little sad if they didn’t go somewhere a bit more exotic.
The MacGuffin Indy is seeking has to be on the same level as the original Trilogy for sure, the odds and risk has to be high. One of many major failings of KOTCS was the MacGuffin.
I like the idea of Excalibur
Excalibur is a good one, or Golden fleece maybe look to Greek or perhaps Norse mythology.
I guess the thing is Last Crusade went to English medieval lore a bit (and Arthur even got a mention from Indy)- I’d like something a little different, ideally something not European. Doesn’t have to be Christian either: we’ve done that a bit. Although maybe something satanic could be interesting.
Yeah time travel wouldn’t upset me.
Valkyrie?
Not sure Time Travel is right for Indy. Too far I think