Indiana Jones

16566687071199

Comments

  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,592
    One last thing about Sallah and Marion: last time they didn’t say that she was coming back until Comic Con 2007. Could history repeat itself? I think so.
  • Posts: 1,469
    mtm wrote: »
    Thrasos wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I was watching the opening of Last Crusade this morning: it seems like he actually is stealing that cross from the rightful owner, is that wrong?
    You're probably right, since he took it by force. However, Indy had a point too, that it belongs in a museum, it originally belonged to Coronado and Panama Hat found it, and Indy sees its higher historical value as an artifact rather than with a price tag. And I guess if you're out in the middle of the ocean and can take it, and you're in a movie....

    The back story is, supposedly adult Indy tracked down Panama Hat to Portugal after getting a tip from a guy who worked for Panama Hat. Indy sneaks onto the ship and takes the cross from a safe. Panama Hat had struggled during the Depression and wanted to offload the cross for dough. A man said he'd buy it--he was suspected of being Walter Donovan--but said he'd only buy it if Indy was dead or killed. So on the ship, Indy is caught and realizes he was set up--as Admiral Ackbar said, it's a trap! And we know what happened after that.

    Ah okay, what’s that from?
    It does seem that the police are on Panama’s side in the young Indy bit -and we’ve no reason to think they’re wrong- and then in the Portugal bit the boat is actually called the Coronado, which would seem to imply that Panama Hat is the rightful owner!
    https://indianajones.fandom.com/wiki/Cross_of_Coronado
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,194
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    One last thing about Sallah and Marion: last time they didn’t say that she was coming back until Comic Con 2007. Could history repeat itself? I think so.
    I can see a brief appearance where Marion pleads with Indy not to go ; she tells him all the reasons that he shouldn’t go, he tells her , “ have no choice “ .

    The stakes are that high…

  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,176
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    Most of the story will take place in the 1960s. It has already been pretty much confirmed by director James Mangold.

    Where was this confirmed?
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    I only wonder because there’s been a big push to de-aging in films. First it was cameos in Marvel films. Then Captain Marvel expanded that with Samuel L Jackson having an extended role. Gemini Man featured a CGI young Will Smith very extensively. The Irishman did it for the first half of the film.

    So I wonder if LucasFilm thinks they can attempt to feature a de-aged Harrison Ford as the star of the film. Would be something of a breakthrough. Actors not only being able to reprise old characters but reprise them as they were decades ago.

    I heard that some news that they were going to bring James Dean like that for a movie soon.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/afm-james-dean-reborn-cgi-vietnam-war-action-drama-1252703/

    Quite a few people aren’t happy with it.

    That’s an entirely different matter, because James Dean is actually dead and has no say in his performance. Ford is at least an active participant in the de-aging process.
  • Posts: 121
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    Most of the story will take place in the 1960s. It has already been pretty much confirmed by director James Mangold.

    Where was this confirmed?

  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,176
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,320
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,194
    mtm wrote: »
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.

    Perhaps we’ll see Indy coming out of a theater having seen a Bond film.

  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2021 Posts: 16,320
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.

    Perhaps we’ll see Indy coming out of a theater having seen a Bond film.

    Ha! And finding it a bit tame compared to real life :D
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,194
    mtm wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.

    Perhaps we’ll see Indy coming out of a theater having seen a Bond film.

    Ha! And finding it a bit tame compared to real life :D

    Oh, he would definitely make a wry quip.

  • Posts: 669
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.

    Perhaps we’ll see Indy coming out of a theater having seen a Bond film.

    Ha! And finding it a bit tame compared to real life :D

    Oh, he would definitely make a wry quip.

    "That guy looks so familiar."
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,194
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    I’d prefer something more concrete, especially since he’s notably done plenty of movies NOT set in the 1960s.

    Well, not since January he hasn't! :)
    I know what you mean; it's not concrete (and it's even possible it may have changed in the intervening five months) but it would seem to point quite heavily to the 60s.

    Perhaps we’ll see Indy coming out of a theater having seen a Bond film.

    Ha! And finding it a bit tame compared to real life :D

    Oh, he would definitely make a wry quip.

    "That guy looks so familiar."
    “ I just can’t buy it, he looks too much like Dad. “

  • Posts: 669
    Mr_Beach wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Really? I mean they all start in the same place, have him racing against an army, third act vehicle chase, same ending (the thing they sought kills the baddie)... compare with Temple and how that doesn’t do the same things.

    Come on! That's like saying every Bond film is a remake of Dr No.

    You may think it's a bit silly (I do too, to a degree) but there is no denying that it truly is a common comment/criticism about LC and KOTCS that they are remakes of Raiders - particularly LC. I think "remake" is a very strong word but they do follow similar structures, but hey, I don't care. Raiders is objectively the "best" of the series but Last Crusade is, IMO, the most fun, and it's my personal favorite.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,320
    Is that Indy under that facemask?

    e9kwd96t8w371.jpg
  • Definitely, and Kathleen Kennedy to his left?
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    I'm surprised no-one was like "...do you mind?" haha :D
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,320
    znqab914iw371.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=432b0d88d3606d425bb26923d06bbc9661ed0c56
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,194
    Oh yeah…
  • Only 1 real Indy. Welcome back. You've been missed.
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,176
    Uh oh, Kathleen Kennedy is about to shove woke/SJW/feminazi propaganda DOWN OUR THROATS!

    ;)
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,320
    Uh oh, Kathleen Kennedy is about to shove woke/SJW/feminazi propaganda DOWN OUR THROATS!

    ;)

    Good thing we've got facemasks on then! :D

    I'm interested in what the guys standing behind are wearing? Could be gowns to hide their costumes, but the collars are very strange...?
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,176
    Hiding Nazi uniforms no doubt.
  • Posts: 16,147
    He looks great!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,320
    himozjkrxw371.jpg
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,127
    Damn Harrison Ford looks good. No different than he did in KOTCS.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2021 Posts: 16,320
    He does look good in that last one, doesn't he? I'm a bit more sold now. I think the jacket is nicer than the Crystal Skull one too.
  • Posts: 121
    Ford looks great and as long as they won't try to make Indy do crazy stunts like the hangar scene of Indy 4, his age won't be an issue.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    So cool to see Ford on set as Indy again. For a long time I assumed this movie would be stuck in development hell so it’s amazing to see the gears beginning to roll.
  • Posts: 1,165
    Indy’s wearing a wedding ring!
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited June 2021 Posts: 16,320
    ak7j4lqrux371.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.