It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
but before the naysayers invade this thread. If SF goes wrong, there won't be any more films, as DC would be the first to step down. So relax...
Imo Craig is fantastic as Bond and to have the offical possibility of him doing 5 is great news to me!
I sure Skyfall is going to be sensational and another huge hit.
Now I wonder if Sam Mendes will return for Bond 24 too? Bet there's a fair chance he will, or perhaps he'll take a breather and come back for Bond 25 and send Craig out in style.
Judging by the PC, he seemed not unwilling IF the production went smoothly, which obviously, from what we know, it did and there is a good chance, he enoyed the experience.
Now cue @DaltonCraig
Apparently it's flat lined.
Well, well, well, so Daniel Craig is hanging around. Must be a popular Bond afterall.
First of all, never underestimate a studio's ability - or the ability of its shareholders - to mess up the financials and end up in bankruptcy which delays productions. Hopefully MGM has gotten rid of a lot of the elements that got it into trouble previously.
Secondly, the public can be a little fickle. One of the best articles I ever read about movie-making talked about how quickly the public's taste changes. As the key demographic (16 to 25 year old males) changes the new, younger guys want something different than what came before. They have to dislike what came before to reinforce how they have something that is their "own". Spielberg said that a true movie star is someone who remains popular for longer than ten years. Being a bit older (I'm Craig's age) I've seen action stars, comedians, and dramatic actors change over very quickly. Interesting how someone can be so hugely popular and then just a couple of years later they are not. So if any actor stays in the role too long they can overstay their welcome.
Having said that I think this is fantastic news. Because Craig is very much a man's man he's an actor that appeals to both men and women (although they will always be a few insecure boys that are threatened by how much women find him attractive). He's also respected by the critics and seems to genuinely care about putting out good product. He doesn't seem the type to let his ego make the wrong decision like pricing himself out of the series or putting in half-assed work because he can coast on previous successes. I was hoping to get at least 4 Bond films with him so I'm extremely happy to read that 5 is the plan.
They better damn well make his 5th movie a great one, not another 'DAF' or 'AVTAK'
Here's a thought: if this is true, won't this be the first time in Bond history where we actually know ahead of time how many movies the actor has left? I wonder how this will pan out....
And by "we", I mean the Bond fans of the 70's.
Moore announced that he was done after AVTAK came out, right? Not before, like Lazenby did?
I reckon it'll be about tying up loose threads from CR, and Skyfall will introduce these themes.