›

X3MSonicX Productions Proudly Presents: 'James Bond 007: One Last Shot'

1…810121314

Comments

  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    edited November 2012 Posts: 2,635
    Thank you for that, @JamesBond :) I'd be glad to work with them, but I don't know if my ideas would fit their thoughts. But i'd like to be there someday.

    While that doesn't happens, i work with the Virtual arts. And here it comes the book covers. Choose your favourite, gentlemen :D

    OLSBookCover.jpg
    OLSBookCover2.jpg

    My favourite's the second Book cover.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    It will. I mean, Neal Purvis and Robert Wade had the worst ideas. With your work on Hellfire and One Last Shot, they are far better from any Daniel Craig movie, not to forget, Brosnan's last outing, DAD.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    JamesBond wrote:
    It will. I mean, Neal Purvis and Robert Wade had the worst ideas. With your work on Hellfire and One Last Shot, they are far better from any Daniel Craig movie, not to forget, Brosnan's last outing, DAD.

    Thank you :) but i don't think that my fan films would make that great success.
    Are Purvis and Wade the producers/writters of Craig's era? I don't think that they made a bad job at all, CR and QoS are great movies. Only DAD was their OTT.

    And at all, the fault of DAD being bad was of Lee Tamahori, imo. If he didn't have all of the ideas like making "Easter Eggs" from other Bond films, And, if The Director was anyone else better than him, it would have been a great film and Brosnan would have left out greatly.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Well, if Purvis and Wade weren't to be hired in the first place, we wouldn't have gotten a reboot.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    And maybe Craig's films would be Property Of A Lady and Risico instead, and then Skyfall.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    I love your cover artworks!! Nice Job!!!

    Agreed for the films.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    JamesBond wrote:
    I love your cover artworks!! Nice Job!!!

    Agreed for the films.

    Thanks :)

    And i'm sure that they would be great movies. At all, CR and QoS were great films, but above is my opinion about if we didn't had the reboots.

    Or even, Skyfall would be Craig's first. He would start off with a new M, and - though i didn't see it yet - would start with great and positive critics.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    It's getting positive reviews because it's Bond's 50th Anniversary. It's all politics, my friend. The film wasn't that good.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    JamesBond wrote:
    It's getting positive reviews because it's Bond's 50th Anniversary. It's all politics, my friend. The film wasn't that good.

    Wow. I hope I don't get disappointed with it.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Well, if you liked the previous two Craig films, you'll love it, then.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    JamesBond wrote:
    Well, if you liked the previous two Craig films, you'll love it, then.

    Yes, i did. :) But not loved more than the Brosnan's era. (Except for DAD)
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Same here about Brosnan. DAD was really a bad film.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Unfortunately.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    I mean, Brosnan's first three were awesome, but DAD was totally the other way around. Anyway, Nightfire and Everything or Nothing would make it up for it.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Nightfire would be a great choice; EoN was great, but the gadgets were too OTT.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    JamesBond wrote:
    It's getting positive reviews because it's Bond's 50th Anniversary. It's all politics, my friend. The film wasn't that good.

    Wow. I hope I don't get disappointed with it.

    He doesn't like Craig, I DO. Trust me, it's very good.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Well, Brady, there was only one sequence in SF I liked, and that was the casino sequence. And also, Craig needs a decent writer, look how much cool he was in BS game.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    JamesBond wrote:
    It's getting positive reviews because it's Bond's 50th Anniversary. It's all politics, my friend. The film wasn't that good.

    Wow. I hope I don't get disappointed with it.

    He doesn't like Craig, I DO. Trust me, it's very good.

    I got to run fast to see the film. I think i'm the last Bond fan up to see it :-((
    I'm not wanting to download it for respect, and because i'll want to see it in the Cinemas (trying to) and get the DVD after that. I'd like to see the extras.
    JamesBond wrote:
    And also, Craig needs a decent writer, look how much cool he was in BS game.

    Bruce Ferstein wrote it. That's what makes Blood Stone a great game. (Wow, I almost typed 'film' instead of 'game') Goldeneye was Even great because of him. ;)
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    JamesBond wrote:
    Well, Brady, there was only one sequence in SF I liked, and that was the casino sequence. And also, Craig needs a decent writer, look how much cool he was in BS game.
    Bond was okay in BS, but too one dimensional. Bond has heart and depth once again in the Craig era.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Emo, you mean?
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Bruce Ferstein wrote it. That's what makes Blood Stone a great game. (Wow, I almost typed 'film' instead of 'game') Goldeneye was Even great because of him. ;)

    Bruce Ferstein also wrote 007 Legends and look how awesome that went. ;)
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    The script and Bond's behaviour might have been awesome, but none of activision's games have a decent Bond game. the last Bond game for me was FRWL.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    Murdock wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    Bruce Ferstein wrote it. That's what makes Blood Stone a great game. (Wow, I almost typed 'film' instead of 'game') Goldeneye was Even great because of him. ;)

    Bruce Ferstein also wrote 007 Legends and look how awesome that went. ;)

    I hope you're being ironic at that point. Actually, 007 Legends sucked - Not every Writter can make a great job everytime. If Bruce changed the story on the 5 (or 6 movies, if Skyfall's changed too) films, that's a pity. But Activision wanted it to be like that, so...
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    edited November 2012 Posts: 669
    Bruce Feirstein is the best writer since Richard Maibum, But if you have a bad boss, your work is deffo gonna suck.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    JamesBond wrote:
    Emo, you mean?

    I wouldn't expect you to understand when your favorite Bond actor got stuck with films that made Bond about as one dimensional as they come.
  • JamesBondJamesBond
    Posts: 669
    Look, no offence, my friend. But, Daniel Craig is in the wrong franchise. Look, how he was awesome in BS, even in 007 Legends (despite the game sucked), but in the films and the rest of the games, he didn't differ too much than Matt Damon's scumbag portrayal of Bourne.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    JamesBond wrote:
    Look, no offence, my friend. But, Daniel Craig is in the wrong franchise. Look, how he was awesome in BS, even in 007 Legends (despite the game sucked), but in the films and the rest of the games, he didn't differ too much than Matt Damon's scumbag portrayal of Bourne.

    Bond in BS is nothing special at all. He's not that emotive at all. And Dan wasn't even in 007 Legends. Just a bad impersonation of him. And Bond and Bourne are not alike in the slightest. They don't act the same or have the same personality at all. Bond has a charm and sophistication about him that Bourne wouldn't give the time of day to. Bond is happy to stick out in the crowd, while Bourne wants to be hidden at all times. I'm sorry, but the Bond is like Bourne comparison is not only a faulty argument, it is the true sign that you have nothing of substance to say. The last argument of a losing man, so to speak.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    I don't like the Bond vs Bourne comparisons. They don't have nothing to do with each other, and are completely different.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    I don't like the Bond vs Bourne comparisons. They don't have nothing to do with each other, and are completely different.

    Like I said, it is the last argument of a losing man.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    I don't like the Bond vs Bourne comparisons. They don't have nothing to do with each other, and are completely different.

    Like I said, it is the last argument of a losing man.

    I don't actually think like that. The arguments that the people use are thoughtless, they would need to watch the whole Bond franchise in order to say something about Bond vs Bourne. Most people who compares Bond and Bourne are the Craig era fans, i think. But the watching of Quantum Of Solace doesn't just matches the entire conversation, Bond was wanting Revenge, and for that he didn't care who he hurt, as M said back then. His two recently-made friends got killed because of his Ego.
    And that can't have anything to do with Bond, just because of 1 movie, they can'truin the entire franchise with arguments.
    I never watched Bourne - I don't like the style of the movies, however i appreciate Matt Damon's work - but I know that he doesn't gets nothing close to Bond.
Sign In or Register to comment.