It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Also - while Nolan is a great Bond fan would he want to do three films in a 6 year period? Directing is not just about 90-120 days filiming, massive investment of time required from the director both before and after. Would a 'name' like Nolan be prepared to invest that in such an established franchise after having already done it with Batman?
I wonder if in mid-2020s we see a changing of the guard and BB and MW let a new producer generation in - name the Wilson sons?
It will all be as unpredictable as DC having made CR.
Good thread, nonetheless. Cheers.
I'd like a Nolan Bond film and it could happen in the future.
I don't think they'll ever bring back an actor again.
I want Scott Adkins to take over when Craig leaves.
As for Nolan, unless his star wanes and he steps in when he's in his mid-50's it's, IMO, never going to happen. Even in those circumstances it would be a stretch. The producers never hire mega-star directors for one simple reason. No one is bigger than Bond. Nolan is currently the Golden Boy of Hollywood, he's too big a persona to be handed the reigns. Yes he'd have a good crack but it would be all about 'The Nolan Bond film'. Mendes is perfect in that he is a quality director but not someone synonymous with blockbusters and thus doesn't come with any baggage.
Bond films are very much a collaborative affair. History proves this. Spielberg and Tarantino are just a few in a long list of top name directors who didn't even get a sniff.
Nolan would mean calling his triology or whatever like Nolan's Bond, and I don't want that. Bond should be remembered as a whole not by parts, like Young's Bond, Hamilton's Bond, Glen's Bond, Campbell's Bond,...
Hardy and Cavill are too well known for the role, it's better to pick an upcoming star not someone who is already stablished and probably related to a role- Cavill=Superman way of thinking.
And Craig would be 55 in 2023, quite too old for his mainly physical Bond. It's not like Moore's funny Bond, who already felt old with 58. Moore's Bond wasn't this strong, this action loving and so on.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/194/your-ultimate-bond-timeline
Thank you!
Couldn't agree more. Well said.
He's done mostly comedies but Hot Fuzz had some really good action scenes and Shaun Of The Dead was actually kind of sad and emotional in some bits.
Martin Campbell or Mendes coming back fine, but another hiatus? I think we've had way too many of those over the last 25 years.
Yeah, like <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=scott+adkins+assassination+games&um=1&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-gb:IE-Address&rlz=1I7ACAW_enGB406&tbm=isch&tbnid=NGwsZzyxMwQWvM:&imgrefurl=http://www.beyondhollywood.com/assassination-games-2011-movie-review/scott-adkins-in-assassination-games-2/&docid=JXefTBTCZTLKyM&imgurl=http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2011/08/Scott-Adkins-in-Assassination-Games.jpg&w=940&h=577&ei=aQ57UNCbCeHG0QXgsoD4BA&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=343&vpy=158&dur=6028&hovh=176&hovw=287&tx=182&ty=100&sig=113874652846532833897&page=1&tbnh=138&tbnw=223&start=0&ndsp=15&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:72&biw=1366&bih=627"> Scott Adkins </a>
Wow, that text link thingy actually worked. I'm quite proud of myself now.
Connery looked better (and just all round was better) in NSNA than in DAF imo.
5 Years/2017 is only example. I don't mind Bond 25 DC final movie in 2016, but then there should take 6 year the next one.