It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I don't think he's referring to a P&W story outline here at all. When Mendes came onboard (which was way before the financial thing was sorted out) Peter Morgan had done a story line/script.
When the financial mess was sorted out he said that he had left the project, but that the 'big hook' in his story remained. So I think that's the thing that Mendes brought over to the script written by P&W and John Logan.... the big hook from Peter Morgan's rejected story line
But then they don't like big directors. We'll see I suppose.
I'd say they are wooing Nolan, and Nolan has showed interest - but I'd say Nolan has too much on his plate to direct a Bond film for another 4 years or something - he's acting as producer on the whole DC reboot of Batman post-Dark Knight, as well as the adjoining Superman reboot and Justice League movie extravaganza. - And whereas Nolan was enthusing about his love of Bond and how it has acted as inspiration to his films, he has gone strangely coy after production on The Dark Knight Rises has finished.
I know Broccoli and co don't like big directors because they've been 'burnt' before - e.g. Matthew Vaughn, Quentin Tarantino - but it's only logical that a director like Nolan who has integrity and can bring intelligence to a big blockbuster and outsell the likes of Tarantino or Vaughn anyday would bring a hell of a lot of money to EON and popularity to Bond (not that it needs it after Skyfall).
@ Lewis, he won't be involved in the next Batman reboot.
I think btw that Tarantino should stay far away from Bond.
Aaahh right - I thought Nolan would be producing in some way due to Gordon Levitt perhaps donning the bat cowel next time. I'm very interested as to what Nolan does next.
Tarantino should indeed stay away from Bond - I think his film genius has long since waned.
Not the weak, little screen time, do-nothing like in most of the films.
The best Felix so far is Wright, and I want him to stay on.. but if the part was re-cast, Henry Czerny is the man.
Or he could play an American villain. That'd be nice to see, too.
Wouldn't he play a fun Felix?
Czerny would be great. He has great presence and I loved his Kittridge. Nothing likeable about that character lol.
Anyone think he's up to do B24 now? Kind of interesting...
http://www.examiner.com/article/x-men-news-matthew-vaughn-out-will-bryan-singer-return
I'm all for it, but in 2D and with Singer at the helm.
I agree, I would love to see Mendes back but if not then Nolan would be a great choice.
A) Will there be a spate of Bondian spy films that are released in the next years due to the renewed success of Bond - and due to several directors being spurned by EON during financially difficult years when the franchise was having some growing pains e.g. Vaughn's Secret Service film and Tarantino's rumoured Len Deighton adaptations.
B) How much does a film or director borrow from Bond-lore before they are called out for plagiarism? or is it just fond pastiche?
"It's not true that I've worked out a new plot for Bond. Nor have I made any commitment to another Bond movie. I have said that I've put everything I wanted into this film. The idea I can simply start again makes me feel physically ill. I need to get back to theatre, spend more time at home and then… and then it might be someone else's turn."