It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
So are you saying that I am "rewriting the history books" because I argue that talent is needed when writing good and memorable melodies?
What kind of a lame argument is that?
And why are you not answering my questions?
Now... have you dug up anything on Barry criticizing Arnold?
And you rewrite the books because orchestrating is very important, as important as writing. So nearly half of the end results on the 5 last Bond soundtracks simply isn't from Arnold's work.
For the last five Bondmovies, Arnold has been a great architect, IMO. Like I wrote so many times earlier in this thread: you may disagree, like I disagree when you are arguing that his work is "lazy" and "lacking." Actually I find a lot of "complexity" in a lot of his work, and so would you probably, if you would put your prejudice towards him away for a while.
Earlier you wrote that Arnold's best work so far was in QoS. Great! So according to you he is getting better and better. And you still want to axe him?
You simply cannot say a lot of his work is 'complex'. It simply isn't true. It's not a matter of opinion, or liking/loving/hating, but a fact. You love his music ? Fine. But don't go around saying untrue things about him. Yes he is good in rare moments, but that's it. The vast majority of his work is very simply and basic.
And please explain why Arnold insists on using the same very limited orchestral range, the same limited number of instruments ? Why doesn't he diversify himself ? Why does he insist on using sound mixing instead of actually working and learning about new instruments ?
The sweeping strings, the layered background, the complex rhythmic textures, the somber french horn, the punctuating percussion motif. This example symbolizes in its essence and structure and atmosphere everything I’ve come to love from a James Bond-score.
Not "complexed" enough for you? I don't care!
And you can find "filler" in all of Barrys soundtracks, too, btw!
Compare that track with this
Atleast the repeating motifs go somewhere. Once 'Night at the Opera' goes back to the first motif, the track is very simple and basic. Barry worked wonders with repeating motifs. Atleast Arnold tried.
Try all you want, but you are grasping at straws.
I have all the soundtracks but the last two get only a few listenings. Am off to watch 'Lewis", has a decent composer too. (Barrington Pheloung)
Arnold has the same limited orchestral range, the same limited number of instruments... the same over-reliance on sound mixing... the same over reliance on his orchestrator. You can't dispute those facts.
I think you haven't studied enough in music classes because it is beyond comprehension that any musician would find complexity in TND, TWINE, and CR. I didn't put DAD because atleast in that one did Arnold compensate his lack of musical knowledge with some clever electronics and sound mixing (for once).
It is a fact that his music is basic. End of. It is a fact he uses a very limited orchestral range, it is a fact he prefers to rely on sound mixing rather than learning about new instruments.
Stop disputing the facts. It is YOUR right to like Arnold. But it is simple fact that his work is basic.
What is so hard in admiting you like basic music ? I myself don't have problem in admiting I love the film 'The Core', which is far from being a masterpiece.
You seem to have got it in the head that Arnold's work is complex. It ISN'T. Just listen to his soundtracks, which obviously you haven't done recently, and listen to it carefully, with an open mind and not with blind love.
Anyone is allowed to love bad music, a bad song, a bad book, a bad game. Anyone can have fun and find entertainement in mediocre things. They can love these mediocre things. But to make these things pass for masterpieces or for the second coming is just wrong.
Who's telling lies here, huh?
Where's that Barry-quote where he supposedly "bashes Arnold"? Some of it is - agreed! Most of it isn't! You really want more examples?
And who's "gasping at straws" here? I've been in the music industry for years, too. But, unlike you, I have no intention of using that information to prove my points!
And yes, a large majority of Arnold's work is very basic. Only on a few rare occasions did he show some brillance.
Your definition of "brilliance" is just different than mine - is that so hard to accept?
I find brilliance in all of his soundtracks. Not all tracks of course. Some are good, some are dull, a few awful, some are "basic". But there are always at least 3-4 tracks that I really like, and that I find fantastic. I have the same view towards all of the Barry soundtracks, btw!
And you still haven't accepted that Arnold has a very limited orchestral range, and that he prefers to rely on sound mixing rather than learning about new instruments.
And you seem to listen to his soundtracks with ear-muffs at times, because the vast majority of tracks on CR are mindblowingly dull. TWINE has about half the tracks that are bad, TND has maybe a little less than half that are awful. And QOS has several awful tracks. And by bad I mean 'basic, simple tracks, seriously lacking in complexity', which you just can't argue with.
You happen to LIKE these tracks? Fine. But to call them musically complex is just wrong. So please accept that you like simple music. Not everyone loves Bach or Bethoven.
Actually you can say the same thing about the most of my record collection! Even the Barry and Led Zeppelin ones :-)
Is my favorite Arnold track by a fair margin.
And this one is great too :
So you want me to start all over from the beginning? With +20 comments in this thread, I would say that I've shared plenty of "views"!
DaltonCraig007 : Actually, for me, I prefer his slower classic tracks, like in the style of these:
(from 1:10)
And one of my favorite Arnold-tracks (the build-up in this one is fantastic):
- "Gun barrel / White Knight"
- "Paris & Bond"
- "Back Seat Driver" (thanks to you @DaltonCraig007 - i forgot about this little gem lol)
- "Kowloon Bay"
- "All In Day's Work" (i think it's a stellar action piece, which has probably the most beautiful ending to any of his works, IMO)
- "Come In 007, Your Time Is Up"
- "Access Denied" (simple, but perfect)
- "Welcome To Baku" (kind of like Blunt Instrument.. a "meh" beginning, but strong finish)
- "Elektra's Theme"
- "Body Double" (a lot like Access Denied, simple, but perfect IMO)
- "I Never Miss"
- "Hovercraft Chase"
- "Some Kind Of Hero"
- "Welcome To Cuba"
- "Icarus"
- "Whiteout"
- "Antonov"
- "African Rundown"
- "Blunt Instrument"
- "Solange"
- "I Am The Money"
- "Vesper"
- "The End Of An Aston Martin"
- "City Of Lovers"
- "The Switch"
- "Time To Get Out"
- "The Palio"
- "Bond in Haiti"
- "Night At The Opera"
- "Target Terminated"
- "Camille's Story"
- "Oil Fields"
- "Perla de las Dunas"
i know that is a lot to digest... but usually, when i make Bond mixes - those are the songs I usually put on there from Arnold.