It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Bond was born in Berlin in Fleming's Higson's and the Reboot canon. So I take it as a yes for Fassbonder to be Bond.
Maybe - Michael Fassenbender, good actor but very overrated.
Never play Bond - Arnold Scwarzengger. Although he would make a good rebooted Goldfinger.
Christian Bale as Bond just doesn't fly for me, he bores me in the Batman role and comes off as cardboard.
I never really wanted Clive Owen as Bond when I was younger, perhaps it was because I grew up with Brosnan as Bond and it was sad to see him go, but after watching the movie, "I'll sleep when I dead" starring Clive Owen a year ago, I was blown away by Owen's performance. It is indeed a amazing movie, and Owen is very very Bondian at times. This movie convinced me that Clive Owen could have been a great Bond.
I think Gerard Butler could be a great Bond, he has that dark grungy Connery style to him. But he definitely would need to make himself comfortable in the role and certainly improve his acting . He's been in a series of rom-coms lately which has really turned me off. The last good movie he played in was 300.
I read that his audition was great but in the wrong way. Apparently he came off as too cold, and like a slightly emotionless killer who just happened to work for MI6 but would be happy working for anyone else. After what happened with Dalton, finding a Bond who would connect with audiences was probably of paramount importance.
What I'm *really* curious about is how seriously Hugh Grant was considered. There was a profile that I read of him in a magazine in the late 90s that was extremely interesting. A female reporter spent several days with him, and his "public persona" dropped quite quickly. He started off as the stuttering, self-deprecating person that he always played in his films but as she spent more time with him he abandoned that and the "real" Hugh Grant came out. She was surprised at how macho and commanding he was, she realized that in public he kept playing the "role" of a foppish Hugh Grant as that was what made him a lot of money. She said that she then realized that he indeed could have played Bond, and that it was a shame that he didn't do a film playing a more manly character. But, as she said, he was so firmly fixed in people's minds as the character from Four Weddings and a Funeral that no matter how good he was in a more "macho" role the audiences wouldn't accept it.