It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
prehaps further investigation shall yield silvas connection to a larger picture.. role on bond 24
Because, as has been pointed out numerous times on this forum, Bond fans aside Quantum mean sweet FA. The main character associated with the organisation is Dominic Greene, one of the most forgettable villains of the series. They don't have the same aura as SPECTRE. They'd need to really up their game to re-establish Quantum. I mean what does it even mean? Nothing. Lazily spun off a title. The acronym SPECTRE is superb.
Pretty much on the money. Outside of here no one would ever notice if Quantum never appeared again and even here I think there would likely be a fair percentage who wouldnt mourn its passing.
Unless it came back with a serious villain running it and an extremely dastardly scheme then frankly I wouldnt miss it either.
I wouldnt mind Logans two story arc starting with an approximation of Gardners Role of Honour, a straightforward Bond film with Bond foiling a Quantum plan and then the second film being a version of Nobody Lives Forever with the head of Quantum sponsoring a hunt for James Bonds head. They could also involve the new Moneypenny in the kidnap plot which I'm sure they would love to do given Judi is gone and the fact Eve has already been out in the field.
It would be nice to see May after 50 years as well. They could introduce her in the first one and then have her kidnapped in the second - although I fear that would appear rather contrived. Maybe drop the kindap angle altogether and just have Quantum wanting Bonds head?
For the millionth time, he came out and said he was misquoted. He essentially said the same thing about Quantum Craig's been saying in recent interviews. He can come back.
First: http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=8330
Second: http://www.mi6-hq.com/news/index.php?itemid=8336&t=mi6&s
Hopefully the last time I post these articles.
C L O S E D