It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Nowhere in the film canon is it hinted at that Bernard Lee's Miles Messervy either quit, died or took any extended leave of absence. Nothing is ever specified, so we can only assume that Robert Brown is a continuation of Sir Miles. Just as with when Felix Leiter and Miss Moneypenny get new actors to portray them.
As for Judi Dench's M, it is made clear by Brosnan's Bond that she had a "predecessor". In the post-2006 reboot continuity however, it can be assumed that, either:
A) Sir Miles Messervy still preceded Judi Dench's M, but in this continuity he never met and will never meet Bond as a 00 agent.
or
B) Judi Dench's female M is actually Sir Miles' predecessor in the reboot canon, and when Judi leaves the role, the new M (assuming he's male) will be introduced as Miles Messervy, much like we can expect the new Q to be introduced as Major Boothroyd instead of just "Q" as John Cleese was briefly known.
Lee's character seems to have a sense of humour, often making witty comments (eg "Jealous husbands, outraged chefs, humiliated tailors! The list is endless!", TMWTGG), while Brown's is more of the serious, strictly business type of boss. Also, Lee's M refers to Bond by his first name a couple of times, both in his last appearances, showing some intimacy. That intimacy was gone when Brown took over.
So to me they're two different persons. Bernanrd Lee is Sir Miles Messervy, Robert Brown is Admiral Hargreaves.
So, was Penny the same person when Lois finished? After all Bond himself was always meant to be the same person.
And of course Q was replaced in 99/2002, not re-cast.
I don't think the Prods really gave it much thought when Brown was cast. (Even less so when Judi's M went back in time whilst ageing as she did so).
So, it's open to your own interpretation.
but in Craig role he become 00 when there was female M so we just cant discuss some things cause they are impossible
The idea Brown's version could be Spy's Admiral Hargreaves is an intriguing one, though...
Film makers and producers are not thinking of these minor little details when the have actors playing multiple parts in their films. Yet to the eagle eyed long-term fans they stick out like a sore thumb.
I guess the thing is we're not supposed to question it. But it's a question that should be answerable.
Perhaps film makers as a whole should look at such ramifications before they cast or change story-lines over multiple films. It's plagued the series for years.
As for Robert Browns M, I've always liked him. He displays the correct amount of warmth whilst being in authority. His admiration of Bond is well played and his best performance as M for me would be TLD.
Whether is Messervy or Haregraves doesn't really bother me. He's just M.
The other thing I like is that Connery's Bond has such a clear and genuine respect for M. Even if he irritates M there's always deference in the end (it's interesting that Lazenby's Bond, younger and in a film around the time of the youth movement, is more rebellious!). I doubt we would ever see such a relationship again - I read a great article a couple of years ago that the coveted 16-25 year old demographic for films and TV shows don't like characters who are completely deferential to authority.
Totally devoid of character or vigor, a lacklustre and colorless character or figure, and it's a relief in retrospect, he only got to appear in a handful of releases. Too bad two of those had to be for Timothy Dalton's tenure. Bernard Lee was the greatest, will never be beaten, and Dench, despite giving the same 17 years of service to the James Bond franchise, simply couldn't quite match up, but Brown is far and away the worst of the lot. I always thought Gordon Jackson from British 70's police drama The Professionals would of made a very good M. He reminded me of Lee. Co-star Lewis Collins could of been Bond at the time just for good measure, but it wasn't to be
I know! I thought there were better chioce to play M at the time. I didn't really care to much for Robert Brown as M.
But there's really no solid evidence either way, and this will probably always be one of the biggest unanswered questions in the franchise. The only people left who could maybe give us a definitive answer are M. G. Wilson and Roger Moore. My guess is Sir Roger would brush it off with a quip, and MGW would be as evasive as possible. :)
An interesting thought.....I'd always assumed that Dench replaced Brown because they were looking to distance themselves from the '80s films and start anew. But a quick Google search reveals that Brown apparently didn't do any acting after 1991, even though he lived another 12 years. Does anyone know why he "retired"? If he had continued acting, might Eon have used him in GE? We could have ended up with a very different series, particularly once we got into the Craig films!
Lee's M had a pretty close relationship with Gogol - they were on a first-name basis in TSWLM (the only time Sir Miles was called by name in the film series).
I like all the Ms to date equally. I also really enjoyed FYEO with Geoffrey Keen & Chief of Staff being in charge. More of Brown may have been nicer but I was satisfied overall.