It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I mean I don't want to type such a post using such a small display and having autocorrect misinterpret what I'm saying.
He won't kill your dreams, but his dreams might kill you.
Hey a DAD quote ..I think. Sounds like one anyway.
Indeed.
Tremendous fun though this is and I hate to be a party pooper by banging on about it but is there any sign of that evidence in the post @Mendes4lyfe?
And by that I don't mean the diseased hallucinations of a sick mind trying to retrofit increasingly desperate and pathetic brainwashing and pushing out of a van hypotheses to try and back up claims that were laughable 3 pages ago buy by this time are getting quite tiresome.
Congrats to you though for giving us all a good laugh in this Bond info drought between films but I think it's probably time the mods put you and this clear case of trolling out of our misery as you obviously taking the piss. Well I really hope for your sake you're taking the piss because otherwise the alternative is you need locking up for the good of society.
If the mods wanted to tell me anything, they are free to do so. I trust their judgement a lot more than yours, so let's leave it up to them, shall we?
Like this theory, it has no facts and is all interpretation infact this
tneory reminds me of a famous french writer, it's a total Balzac ! :))
My apologies, I actually meant in the movie novelization, not the movie itself.
While codename makes little sense, we all have to admit: EON sure did their part with OHMSS to sort of put that out there. It wasn't until 1981, with FYEO, and the gravesite, that EON kind of put that theory to bed* (along with Blofeld as a villain).
*I would love to do some research on what types of "codename" theories that were being built/spread through the 70s, in newspapers and magazines. This would lend weight to any ideas that the grave scene in FYEO was purposeful.
:)) =))
Seriously, this thread has to be the most hilarious thing I've ever read, hopefully mods will never lock it.
Re OHMSS - it's called breaking the fourth wall.
;)
True. But that had never happened in a Bond film before.
BTW...
http://screencrush.com/breaking-the-fourth-wall-movies/
'This never happened to the other fella' is a device known as 'breaking the fourth wall'. Lazenby addresses the audience directly, not in character. It can be seen as a bizarre creative choice, but it has no narrative implications. As I have mentioned previously, later in the film there's the scene where Bond goes through his various possessions from previous missions, which is a deliberate device to show the audience that the fictional character you are watching is the same fictional character from the preceding films.
So no, I don't have to admit EON put anything out there. They reference Tracy indirectly in TSLWM, explicitly in FYEO and indirectly again in LTK. All small nods to the audience to indicate the fictional character, while portrayed by different actors, is the same man.
EDIT: Didn't see the above before posting - but glad to see most people understand the fourth wall moment in OHMSS.
Ha ha.
His martini stirred, or was this the mask of an imposter slipping ? ;)
After all there is no plastic surgery in the world good enough to make that scar on Pleasance's face go away and at the end of OHMSS isn't Telly paralysed?
I assume that after each failed SPECTRE scheme Blofeld is killed and then a new one elected - partly because of failure and partly to keep MI6 confused.
I've got no evidence to back it up but there's also nothing in the films to prove I'm wrong so I presume you all believe me.
My perception of reality is being twisted ! :)
YOLT is a prequel. EON decided to film FRWL before YOLT because back then they didn't have the technologies required to film it.