It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Really??? If Bond was incompetent in SF then for most of the 23 movies Bond is pretty much brain dead and don't get me started on Bond's super ineptitude in GF.
You're clearly new to Bond movies.
This one, the toasting, the "let me in" are one of my favorite moments in SF. The capability of mixing this comic side with the dramatic and intense scenes makes me believe this is one of the greastest portrayals of Bond, along with Connery's FRWL and TB. I won't be surprise if I put it on the top in a few years.
The only reason Bond won in GF is because Pussy Galore wanted to have sex with Sean Connery. He got insanely lucky there, no question.
I reckon Bond was at his most competent in LTK. Even when he messed up (failing to kill Sanchez), he quickly came up with a new plan (using his newfound trust to destroy Sanchez's organisation).
Sorry, could not resist ...
:\"> :-S
I don't think he was. He literally stumbled across the villians evil plan because his plane was shot down.
Pretty much. Whether it relates to SF or not, he enters any thread he can to trash the film. And SF isn't another DAD: this is a film that is highly praised by many fans and critics alike, yet this one viewer who considers himself a big enough Bond fan to join a forum dedicated to the world of James Bond cannot just praise the good in the film?
And that's saying something. ;)
In all honesty, as much as we all loathe DAD, I still enjoy it for the good parts.
You don't see ANYTHING from their past, but boy do Craig and Finney sell it!
Craig really is being him and not playing him. There is a difference. And if he doesn't topple Connery off of the top of the list from best to worst, then he's sure on the same level. But Craig's EVERY. SINGLE. NUANCE. I saw in Skyfall looks just like it's coming off of the pages of some lost Fleming work. The boredom in his "enjoying death" phase and the physical exams scenes were what got me, and this is the first time in a long time, I'm talking since Dalton in LTK, where we see a VERY human, fallible character like what Fleming gave us. When he whacks the floor in anger when Patrice plunges to his death without giving up information. The conversation with Severine. I don't know how they did it, making this film so Fleming-esque. But it's been the best effort yet and I do hope it keeps going like this with Craig. I dare say, if they keep Craig past Bond 25, I would like to see them do the older Bond storyline like in the Gardner books, re-activated 00-section, something like that. Lots of potential. What I am basically saying is, it's going to be hard for the next fella to hold a candle to Daniel Craig, so why not keep him as long as possible?
Really? You can go back to GF and say would a licensed hitman for the British government really wink at a Chinese guard before trying to escape from his cell? Also what "line" are you referring to?
:-S
It was so frightening I spoofed it, if you remember, a while back:
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/6509/full2gfpun.png
I know I've said it before, but I don't recall if you or someone else did the spoof of Bond and Mr. Kil from DAD, but oh man, is it rich.
And Christmas is coming up, so we'll have to revisit that, haha.
And do you have a link to the Mr. Kil one? I need to laugh right now.
That I do, coming your way.
You mean with different text? I dunno if I could, I used every Christmas reference possible...
hardly incompetent... we aren't talking about Goldfinger here - where everything he does backfires, and then someone else stops the bomb - not him....
how many times in the entire series has Bond gotten by on luck, or having the right gadget at the right time?.. it's part of the Bond formula - put him against the odds in an entirely implausible situation, and he'll still find a way out.. thats what makes Bond, BOND..... if it wasn't for the knife in the briefcase in FRWL, Grant probably would've succeeded in strangling 007 - not to mention the exploding talcum powder, which set up the fight to begin with - before, 007 was at his mercy..
i dare ask.... how many Bond films have you seen...... and if you've seen them all - then let me also ask, how many did you find 100% plausible and realistic?.. because what you call "a piece of thrash(?)" - HAS BEEN DONE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE F-ING SERIES!
One of the reasons I loved the film so much. It's nice to see Bond make a few mistakes now and again. It's also one of the reasons I love the books so much too.
You really know your stuff, I'm very impressed!!!
He won't be able to answer.
I cannot believe how far the Bond films have sunk with their depths of unrealism since the days of Brosnan and DAD.
Bring back the invisible car and double-taking pigeons, that's what I say. At least we know invisible cars and double-taking pigeons do exist in real life, don't we.