It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Personally, as much as I love Miss Trench, I'd rather leave her in the 60's- and at the start of B24 put Camille Montes in the PTS with Bond. However- this time, we see a bit of 'action'.
I would like it to see a new incarnation of Miss. Trench, as all the other 'classic' characters have gotten them, but I'd also still hope to see Camille return. She was one of the great things in QoS and I have the feeling her character just isn't done yet, they can do a lot more with her.
Yeah, it's not like it's a big deal, just another little nod I would have liked to have seen (I'm a huge FRWL fan so I can get a bit indulgent!)
As far as actress goes - I'd dress her the same as Eunice Gayson in Dr No (either red dress OR in bonds shirt practicing her putting!) but she wouldn't have to look like her physically...I'd say maybe someone like Emilia Clarke (Calisi from Game of Thrones - with dark hair though) or maybe a more comedic actress like Rose Byrne?
How about Sienna Miller?
How about Sienna Miller?
I like this! Especially with Layer Cake connection with Craig!
I'd also love to see Rachel Weiz but fear it would be far too small of a part for her.
Do we really need to start going down this road? I think people are starting to get obsessed with this whole rebooting thing.
I can understand a case for Blofeld but when we have people suggesting incidental characters like Sylvia need to be brought back and have their origins explained things are getting out of hand.
Where do we draw the line? Lets reboot JW? Bibi? The waiter who says 'ooo a surprise' in TMWTGG? The sodding pigeon?
Unless we are talking Klaus Hergescheimer then this has to stop.
Yeah, it's getting a bit tiresome. Almost like some people view the series as some mawkish, nostalgic free for all. They really need to knock the references on the head and start getting genuinely f-ing creative. I don't want any bloody nods in Bond 24. Give me a fricking good Bond movie borne out of originality.
Eunice Gayson did a good job for her two appearance, and since the character hasn't been seen since 1963, there's really no sense in making a coming back now. I hope it never sees the light of day
Some things with 007 are just best left in the past. This is just another example
Wait, do you mean the actress or the role? There's no reason to bring back the role, if that's what you're thinking. Skyfall proved (with Severine) that they could still make very interesting female roles.
Exactly! Also, the films should try to become something of their own. You can only look back at previous icons so much, before it becomes stale.
Good point there.
Moreover...
If there was one nod that they could have made in SF to the very beginning of the series, it would be this: when M asks Bond if he's ready to get back to work I would have loved him to add "This won't seem very exciting to you but it might be a nice rest - we've lost contact with the Head of Station in Jamaica and he and his secretary seem to have disappeared." This would have been a nice reference to DN, but the problem is that you just know a certain percentage of fans would angrily debate whether or not 2012's SF takes place before 1962's DN, or feel cheated that Bond 24 wasn't a remake of DN! But just a nice simple line like that would have been great, even if it was never followed up in any way afterwards.
Skyfall had plenty of that.