The name's 25. Bond 25, or rather, it's NTTD.

19091939596149

Comments

  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,584
    Risico007 wrote: »
    shobair wrote: »
    i seen lots of titles that all you guys wrote in this community for bond 24 and 25 but remember no title will selected from here . they'll select a title that we never think about it. this happened on bond 24 ( Spectre ) all guys wrote shatterhand , risico , Property of a Lady and something like these repetitious titles

    In 2007 many fans championed Quantum of Solace and were right

    And I could of sworn once the rights for Spectre were bought back a few thought of it as a title

    Correct
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,664
    I remember some of us bet big money on 'Tomorrow Never Lies', just to have to Surrender payment. :(
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    What makes it tough to come up with a title is due to the lack of plot details. We usually have something to go on by now, but there's no actual details of the plot. We've had rumours of it been similar to OHMSS, but who knows? It would make sense, however, as it would tie in with Blofeld quite nicely.

    I'm just so glad it's not Shatterhand. It's a title I couldn't take seriously. It's more like an Austin Powers title than a bond one.

    So when do you guys think the big reveal is? Has to be beginning of April at the latest. Has anyone else noticed that the arrow on the autograph is pointing to the letter D. Is this just a coincidence where she signed it, because the arrow points right at the letter D. Could the new title begin with D???? Just a thought.

    barbara-broccoli-shatterhand-1766873.jpg?r=1551781320736
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,664
    Doesn't mean anything. I'd laugh though, if they were cheeky enough to call it Swannsong. Honestly, I wouldn't be mad. :))
  • Posts: 416
    QBranch wrote: »
    Doesn't mean anything. I'd laugh though, if they were cheeky enough to call it Swannsong. Honestly, I wouldn't be mad. :))

    If it does end up beginning with D then it would be interesting whether that arrow was suggestions it, but yeah, it most likely means nothing. I do personally think it will begin with D though aside from the autograph.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,664
    Die Yet Another Day.
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    I've made a new lists of titles I've come up with. Any that you think are cool let me know. Just for fun.

    Death by Spies.
    The Shadow Client.
    Time Never Last's
    Don't Dice with Death
    Never Dream of Dying


  • Posts: 16,204
    Risico007 wrote: »
    shobair wrote: »
    i seen lots of titles that all you guys wrote in this community for bond 24 and 25 but remember no title will selected from here . they'll select a title that we never think about it. this happened on bond 24 ( Spectre ) all guys wrote shatterhand , risico , Property of a Lady and something like these repetitious titles

    In 2007 many fans championed Quantum of Solace and were right

    And I could of sworn once the rights for Spectre were bought back a few thought of it as a title

    I remember that as well. Hard to believe that was more than 10 years ago. I was actually thrilled that QOS was used because I always loved it as a Bond title alongside the other unused short stories.
    I remember in Benson's JAMES BOND BEDSIDE COMPANION , reading that Variety had announced a sequel to NSNA called SPECTRE. It was to be the start of a rival Bond series McClory was brewing up. Ever since then I thought SP would make a good Bond film title. So I wasn't disappointed when Eon eventually used it.
    Honestly, I like most of the proposed titles McClory had in mind: WARHEAD, ATOMIC WARFARE, WARHEAD 2000 A.D., etc.
    To this day I have yet to be gutted when Eon officially announces the title of the latest entry, though DIE ANOTHER DAY sounded too similar to TOMORROW NEVER DIES for my taste.
    The only time I was really disappointed was LICENCE REVOKED being re-titled LICENCE TO KILL
    . I felt Eon had copped out and opted for something more cliche.
    I have a hunch B25's title will be catchy, memorable and Bondian.
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    Is there a chance it could well be Shatterhand. If she signed the autograph and left it like that with the Shatterhand logo, people would expect it to be that title even more. Yet, this could be a bluff to make you think it's not the title. What do you think ? Also, if you think about it, the rumours of that title have been circulating for many months. Why hasn't the producers gunned that down back then. Funny they remained quite during that time. I am actually thinking this is the title still, and it's not something I would be happy with if so.
  • Posts: 678
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.
  • Posts: 4,617
    If the title reveal is a big thing to leverage PR/press covererage and considering the issue re leaks last time, the real title should not even be on the computer network and only known by a handful of people. On this basis, Shatterhand is THE least likely title of all IMHO
  • Posts: 9,853
    shobair wrote: »
    i seen lots of titles that all you guys wrote in this community for bond 24 and 25 but remember no title will selected from here . they'll select a title that we never think about it. this happened on bond 24 ( Spectre ) all guys wrote shatterhand , risico , Property of a Lady and something like these repetitious titles

    Actually I (due to being bored at work) checked the older pages and yes Spectre was mentioned a few times usually with words around it but yeah people did guess it before it was announced by a few years....


    So if it's from Fleming my guess is someone here will guess it
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.

    Look back to Skyfall though. Known as the worst kept secret. That went out a while before they revealed it.
  • Posts: 9,853
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.

    Look back to Skyfall though. Known as the worst kept secret. That went out a while before they revealed it. But either way.

    that was when they registed the film as a website... those days are over now though which is a dam shame god I loved Casino Royale's Site... Quantum's was kind of cool but still man
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.

    Look back to Skyfall though. Known as the worst kept secret. That went out a while before they revealed it. But either way.

    that was when they registed the film as a website... those days are over now though which is a dam shame god I loved Casino Royale's Site... Quantum's was kind of cool but still man

    Oh yeah, I actually forgot about how it got leaked. It's all coming back to me now. In a way im glad those days are gone, because it is more fun and exciting to see the reveal when you don't know what it is. What ever the title is though, it doesn't reflect on how good the film is. If I end up not liking the title, it doesn't mean the film wont be great. It would be nice to have a great title and film and theme song though. Bond films need to strike those three things and it's a tough one to do. Let's hope Daniel really does go out with a bang.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    ENEMY ACTION
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    ENEMY ACTION
    Nice reference to GF.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,359
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.

    Look back to Skyfall though. Known as the worst kept secret. That went out a while before they revealed it. But either way.

    that was when they registed the film as a website... those days are over now though which is a dam shame god I loved Casino Royale's Site... Quantum's was kind of cool but still man

    Why are those days over?
  • Posts: 9,853
    echo wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    It's not gonna be the title, the title is always a big reveal, they wouldn't just have it floating around for months and months as a production title.

    Look back to Skyfall though. Known as the worst kept secret. That went out a while before they revealed it. But either way.

    that was when they registed the film as a website... those days are over now though which is a dam shame god I loved Casino Royale's Site... Quantum's was kind of cool but still man

    Why are those days over?

    websites and the internet used to be exciting now they are all kind of bland there is just no money put into websites

    for what its worth I typed 3 of the short story titles (new York is not rumored for a location so I didn't test 007 in new york) and Shatterhand.com and nothing happened sorry everyone
  • Posts: 416
    Birdleson wrote: »
    SPECTRE, as a title, had been popping up periodically before it was confirmed.

    It did. So there's no reason Shatterhand wouldn't be the same. But if it's ruled out with that autograph then haven't a clue
  • Posts: 9,853
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    SPECTRE, as a title, had been popping up periodically before it was confirmed.

    It did. So there's no reason Shatterhand wouldn't be the same. But if it's ruled out with that autograph then haven't a clue

    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
  • Posts: 416
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    SPECTRE, as a title, had been popping up periodically before it was confirmed.

    It did. So there's no reason Shatterhand wouldn't be the same. But if it's ruled out with that autograph then haven't a clue

    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
    How do you know. I know Hildebrand was seen in Spectre when they visit the safe house, but I never expected it to be a title for a film. I don't know about that one, but we'll see soon enough

  • Posts: 416
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »
    SPECTRE, as a title, had been popping up periodically before it was confirmed.

    It did. So there's no reason Shatterhand wouldn't be the same. But if it's ruled out with that autograph then haven't a clue

    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
    How do you know. I know Hildebrand was seen in Spectre when they visit the safe house, but I never expected it to be a title for a film. I don't know about that one, but we'll see soon enough

    That doesn't have a catchy way with it though. I think they will use something a bit more catchy.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,904
    Risico007 wrote: »
    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
    Agreed. So obvious.
  • edited March 2019 Posts: 416
    Risico007 wrote: »
    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
    Agreed. So obvious.

    Why is it so obvious?
    I disagree. I beleive it's most certainly something fresh that's non-fleming. If they use something Fleming, then I would prefer Risico. It's more certainly going to be Risico than that title if you ask me. But what makes you so certain of that title? Risico seems far more intriguing and catchy than the other title you mentioned.

    Potential bigger spoiler below.
    I did some reaserch, and Risico seems more likely. One reason is that if you search about the short story. Guess where Bond travels too ? He goes to Italy. Italy is apparently a location fo this film. I know that doesn't make it Risico. But it is a location mentioned in the short story. Just saying. ;)
    Risico is a short story about Bond investigating a drug smuggling operation in Italy

  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    edited March 2019 Posts: 13,904
    Just certainty on my part. Nothing sinister.
    It's the "H" on the Instagram."
    The other ones are good, too.
  • Posts: 416
    Gareth007 wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    It's obviously
    The Hildebrand Rarity
    Trust me I know :)
    Agreed. So obvious.

    Why is it so obvious?

    I would be delighted for it to be called Risico. Sounds far better. I think its that anyway if it's fleming title used. 3194902440_9ec7af05c7_o.jpg
  • Posts: 416
    Just certainty on my part. Nothing sinister.
    It's the "H" on the Instagram."
    The other ones are good, too.
    Sorry what do you mean H on Instergram
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,904
    Okay, I'll explain. I said it earlier and I'll say it again, @Gareth007.

    Barbara Broccoli is telegraphing to all that "H's not Shatterhand". That's what she wrote, as showcased in the image below. H meaning Hildebrand. Therefore: Hildebrand (or The Hildebrand Rarity, more likely), the chosen title for BOND 25, is not Shatterhand, the working title.

    So that's what I'm saying. And Ms. Broccoli is a fine lady for sharing this information the way she did.

    barbara-broccoli-shatterhand-1766873.jpg?r=1551781320736
    STAR-V1N18-001.jpg
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,664
    It's obvious Barbara meant they're rebooting a North Korean General from DAD as the big bad, in
    SHATTERHAN

    latest?cb=20150916114101
Sign In or Register to comment.