› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…331332334336337…870

Comments

  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I wonder if our friend Baz will have another scoop on Bond 24 for us all tomorrow?!!! ^:)^
    It's only 4:45pm where I am now. So his article is usually released at around 6:30pm.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited November 2014 Posts: 11,119
    AdaShelby wrote: »
    This isn't anything spoilery: http://www.enstarz.com/articles/51299/20141119/james-bond-24-movie-news-next-villain-will-lay-trail-to-follow-daniel-craig-showing-off-detective-skills-to-find-bad-guy-video.htm

    This already sells it for me :-). This could hint to a very slow introduction of S.P.E.C.T.R.E. and Blofeld, like I said. Perhaps the actual villain will be revealed only in the end...and will not get caught after all. A "master plan" towards a climatic world threathening event in "Bond 25". And that's more stuff for a slow, nuanced re-introduction of S.P.E.C.T.R.E. and Blofeld.

    Here you see again the original John Logan-idea: Making a two-parter, two films, so we fans get very annoyed at the end of "Bond 24".....making us ANGRY of curiosity :-P.


    Aaaah well, and at this stage I can be very wrong also :-P.
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,858
    I think this means Quantum is back
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    AdaShelby wrote: »
    This isn't anything spoilery: http://www.enstarz.com/articles/51299/20141119/james-bond-24-movie-news-next-villain-will-lay-trail-to-follow-daniel-craig-showing-off-detective-skills-to-find-bad-guy-video.htm

    This already sells it for me :-). This could hint to a very slow introduction of S.P.E.C.T.R.E. and Blofeld, like I said. Perhaps the actual villain will be revealed only in the end...and will not get caught after all. A "master plan" towards a climatic world threathening event in "Bond 25". And that's more stuff for a slow, nuanced re-introduction of S.P.E.C.T.R.E. and Blofeld.


    Aaaah well, and at this stage I can be very wrong also :-P.
    I do believe however, that Bond 24 and Bond 25 will not have a story arch. Isn't that why Sam Mendes agreed to come back?
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I think this means Quantum is back

    Or indeed 'QUANTUM'. Who knows ;-). I am thrilled by these articles.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    I do not think there will be a 2 film story arc. Carrying over a character introduced at the end of Bond 24 would not be the same as a 2 film story arc. I rather do not want a 2 film story arc. Anyway, it is all just up in the air. The press conference cannot come soon enough!
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    New Baz Bamigboye article. But very bad news.
    Sam Mendes was fired, Daniel Craig sustains injury that may delay production.

    Just Kidding! :))
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    jake24 wrote: »
    New Baz Bamigboye article. But very bad news.
    Sam Mendes was fired, Daniel Craig sustains injury that may delay production.

    Just Kidding! :))

    Can someone re-do the torture scene from "Casino Royale" with this young laddy called @Jake24 :-P?
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    New Baz Bamigboye article. But very bad news.
    Sam Mendes was fired, Daniel Craig sustains injury that may delay production.

    Just Kidding! :))

    Can someone re-do the torture scene from "Casino Royale" with this young laddy called @Jake24 :-P?
    Ouch!
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    The idea of Bond doing some investigating and detective work (done seriously) is something I've wanted to see for a very long time. It adds a layer to the mystery and suspense thriller elements that the Bond movies should be wearing on their sleeve.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    edited November 2014 Posts: 4,619
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Here you see again the original John Logan-idea: Making a two-parter, two films, so we fans get very annoyed at the end of "Bond 24".....making us ANGRY of curiosity :-P.

    This is what Sam Mendes said about Bond 24 back in April: "...I started to get interested in it again when they agreed to wait a little longer [...] and not go with two movies but with one, which I felt very strongly about..."

    Source: http://tinyurl.com/ko5vr5a starting at 17:55

    It has already been discussed to death that they scapped the initial plan to make Bond 24 & 25 a two part story, so it doesn't make much sense for you to bring that up again as if there is any chance Bond 24 will be the first part of a two parter. If anything, Mendes referred to Bond 24 as the second part of the story started in Skyfall (at least thematically).
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    PanchitoPistoles wrote: »
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Here you see again the original John Logan-idea: Making a two-parter, two films, so we fans get very annoyed at the end of "Bond 24".....making us ANGRY of curiosity :-P.

    This is what Sam Mendes said about Bond 24 back in April: "...I started to get interested in it again when they agreed to wait a little longer [...] and not go with two movies but with one, which I felt very strongly about..."

    Source: http://www.zimbio.com/watch/Y1AdlLgP4iL starting at 17:55

    It has already been discussed to death that they scapped the initial plan to make Bond 24 & 25 a two part story, so it doesn't make much sense for you to bring that up again as if there is any chance Bond 24 will be the first part of a two parter. If anything, Mendes referred to Bond 24 as the second part of the story started in Skyfall (at least thematically).

    Okay, thank you, but:
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    Aaaah well, and at this stage I can be very wrong also :-P.

    Take it easy ok @PanchitoPistoles ;-). You can throw....links and articles at me. But with care and love please ;-).
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,858
    I just want confirmation Quantum is back in Bond 24. That would just about make my day.
  • PanchitoPistolesPanchitoPistoles 2.0
    Posts: 4,619
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I just want confirmation Quantum is back in Bond 24. That would just about make my day.

    @-)
  • Risico007Risico007
    Posts: 9,858
    i said quantum at least i didn't say shakey cam or Marc Forester.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,359
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I just want confirmation Quantum is back in Bond 24. That would just about make my day.

    Mine too. I hope Craig's last film closes the lid on Quantum and ends with him finishing off Mr. White. Finally avenging Vesper.

  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,229
    Risico007 wrote: »
    i said quantum at least i didn't say shakey cam or Marc Forester.

    Too many people mix both.
  • JWESTBROOKJWESTBROOK
    edited November 2014 Posts: 5,745
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    And I agree if done with panache but still
    ....the crashing into a house just seems so close to SF.

    If you don't start using spoiler tags I'll flag you into oblivion.
  • MrBondMrBond Station S
    Posts: 2,044
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I wonder if our friend Baz will have another scoop on Bond 24 for us all tomorrow?!!! ^:)^

    No scoop tonight, I'm afraid.
  • MrBondMrBond Station S
    Posts: 2,044
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    I wonder if our friend Baz will have another scoop on Bond 24 for us all tomorrow?!!! ^:)^

    No scoop tonight, I'm afraid.
  • Pierce2DanielPierce2Daniel
    Posts: 4,412
    Though it's been all but confirmed, Hoyte Van Hoytema has now put an end to any speculation in a recent interview about whether Bond 24 will be shot on film or digital:

    http://www.hitfix.com/in-contention/interstellar-cinematographer-on-grounding-nolans-movie-and-shooting-bond-on-film/single-page

    Also Baz has stated there will be no news from him this week:
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited November 2014 Posts: 11,139
    And there you have it, Bond 24 will be filmed on Film and NOT digital. Case closed!

  • Suivez_ce_parachuteSuivez_ce_parachute
    Posts: 2,015
    doubleoego wrote: »
    Case closed!
    Hm... this is a fan forum :)

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited November 2014 Posts: 11,139
    Well the ongoing debate of people disputing if Bond 24 will be filmed in digital or on film has been answered by the man lensing the film, hence the case on the matter of how this movie will be filmed is closed.
  • leas_moleleas_mole love is the promise of suffering
    Posts: 574
    Thanks to @chipsticks - in case you missed it on the Bond girl rumour thread, we can rule out Penelope Cruz as she has now signed on for Zoolander 2.

    Wow they really are keeping the title and any other castings secret this time round.
  • dragonskydragonsky
    Posts: 2,491
    Sandy wrote: »
    dragonsky wrote: »
    So there are rumours that Waltz is not the villain ? :/

    He would make an AMAZING villain..I hope he is not an ally but the villain

    Why? I think he would make an amazing ally as well! Villains do not hold the monopoly of great characters. Is Kronsteen more fascinating than Darko Kerim Bey, for example?
    For me personally Villains >Allies
    Maybe not Kronsteen but I "care" so to speak more about characters like Dr.No or Zorin rather than Kerim Bey.

    Also maybe it's because I really think that Waltz would be terrific villain, and he can become the next Goldfinger (or the first...whatever his name will be)
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    doubleoego wrote: »
    Well the ongoing debate of people disputing if Bond 24 will be filmed in digital or on film has been answered by the man lensing the film, hence the case on the matter of how this movie will be filmed is closed.

    He was being sarcastic.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    And I agree if done with panache but still
    ....the crashing into a house just seems so close to SF.

    If you don't start using spoiler tags I'll flag you into oblivion.

    Sorry . Both were posted pretty close before reminder.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited November 2014 Posts: 12,480
    JWESTBROOK wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    And I agree if done with panache but still
    ....the crashing into a house just seems so close to SF.

    If you don't start using spoiler tags I'll flag you into oblivion.
    Thank you, JWESTBROOK!

    And thanks for being so nice about it, mcdonbb.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    No problem I wasn't thinking
Sign In or Register to comment.