It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
And of course she is going to bed 007. It would be sacrilege for her not to! :D
To quote Mr. Bond, "Well, that shouldn't be too difficult"
Which was according to him "excellent".
So I don't build my hopes on that line.
Quantum don't return, but i hope it is only a name change. As said before it take some time to accepted things and it strange if there turn everthing up side down again after QOS and Skyfall. Or are Monica playing Camile, i only see pres cofrence partly i see dicovery of title and cast of Astin Martin and cast members.
It's great that right now we don't know who exactly the main villain of the movie will be. Waltz will probably play the leader of SPECTRE but that does not necessarily mean he is going to be the main bad guy in this movie. I suspect a lot of people will say that Scott will be the main villain but what if it's Bellucci? Anyway, I think it's very likely that either Lea or Bellucci will play a member of SPECTRE. But what if ALL the new characters (played by Waltz, Bautista, Bellucci, Seydeoux and Scott) will turn out to be members of SPECTRE?
The synopsis seems to suggest that M (and MI6) will have a significant role in the movie and that the film will have two main story lines (Bond on a mission & MI6 members back home). Will Waltz play the enemy of Bond and Scott the enemy of M?
As for the crew members: very happy about Lee Smith and Hoyte van Hoytema and great to have Thomas Newman confirmed! By the way, at least 3 crew members have a very good chance to be nominated for an Oscar this year: Gassner for Into the Woods and van Hoytema & Lee Smith for Interstellar.
It would provide a little more significance to the Craig era and enhance the personal confrontation between Blofeld and Bond for Vesper if not for Tracy. Additionally, no one does angry Bond better than Craig, so I'd like to see reason for him to be this way again, if only for a small bit of the movie.
@slyfox, kudos to you for getting the info on this right.
Indeed - I wonder if the bullethole in the shape of an octopus might be incorporated into the gunbarrel sequence (hopefully at the beginning of the film)?
Also, I think quite a bit was given away when Mendes remarked that Scott shouldn't walk behind him, and also where Scott was standing on stage!
I also thought the title might possibly be Risico as it was being slowly revealed piece by piece. But I think this film is being approached for a very interesting angle! Looking foward to the updates to come :)
All words created by the wunderful Ian Fleming were wunderful. I see it as a Fleming creation, and having said that it suddenly has a more imaginative ring to it. Just like chapter title "The World Is Not Enough" or novel title "Doctor No" :-).
That's an interesting idea, and could be quite inventive. However, I'd still prefer the traditional (non-CGI) gunbarrel in SPECTRE.
I have been thinking about this, too. I remember what Mr. White said: "We have people everywhere." Imagine if Quantum is just one organization within the organization of SPECTRE. Then White's words mean something more.
We just had a one word title that started with an S. Now we've got too short titles in a row and this one just doesn't feel Bondian at all. They could have named it something else entirely and still made the allusion to SPECTRE as an organization with the octopus-shattered bullet hole.
Other announcements, aside from that awful name Hinx, are fine by me. But damn I really don't like that title.
A cryptic message from Bond’s past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organisation.
So it's basically Skyfall part II, which had "the past becomes the present" as tagline. So what could this "cryptic message" be? "Think on your sons"? :-)
I think more of the Charachter Guy Haynes in Quantum, if you remember he was one of the Prime Ministers right hand men. The Synopsis states "M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive". Does Haynes have an agenda. I too would love Qauntum to only be the tenticals of the main body of the Specre Octupuss.
But at least this one has some Fleming relevance and is not totally contrived
for all we know it is Blofeld playing mind games.
How can they make this resonate with the audience?
Is it from Vesper? From M (in the bulldog, as has been rumoured)? From Tracy? From Mathis?
I wonder...
Anyone who has ever seen an Bond film will know exactly what SPECTRE is. I can't think of anything more Bondian.
Adding 'of death' or other unnecessary phrases to it just sounds like a cheesy episode of Diagnosis Murder, much like 99% of the suggestions made on this forum. I think they've made a very sensible choice.