SPECTRE Production Timeline

1410411413415416870

Comments

  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    I can type emails and post as fake Sony emails. Its a hoax... Real exes or whomever would send professional looking email mostly with a signature. My company does so seems like faked by amateurs.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    Posts: 1,756
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    I can type emails and post as fake Sony emails. Its a hoax... Real exes or whomever would send professional looking email mostly with a signature. My company does so seems like faked by amateurs.

    Hackers simply retrieve information may it be extremely vague or not. They didn't screen cap emails, they stole 0101010101 worth of information.
  • edited December 2014 Posts: 4,619
    bondjames wrote: »
    I think they need another script rewrite, or fixup after this leak. What a mess.

    Are you insane? They have a finished screenplay and started filming two days ago. There is NO WAY they will rewrite the script.
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    I can type emails and post as fake Sony emails. Its a hoax...

    Seriously??? This article is coming from CNN and dozens of other sites have posted articles about these leaks. It's not a hoax.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited December 2014 Posts: 23,883
    [Are you insane? They have a finished screenplay and started filming two days ago. There is NO WAY they will rewrite the script.

    Don't take things so literally mate. I was making a tongue in cheek comment given the obviously unexpected leak of material facts in a multi-million $$ movie, the plot of which has, to date, been guarded like Fort Knox.

    Of course they aren't going to rewrite now. That's a given.
  • Can someone KILL those damn hacker-basterds??? X( . Hacking is a nice subject for movies, hence Silva. But this is really getting out of hand. Anyway, kill them!!

    Are you an agent of SPECTRE? Well, then I am one too! How dare they post this. Call Number One. We've got some clean up to do.

    Even more so....I was just checking news on MI6-HQ, regarding the massive budget and the fights that have been going on between on one side MGM and on the other side Barbara Broccoli/Ami Pascal.

    But please.....you easily forget reading that this news item contains spoilers, EVEN when there's a slight warning. I accidentally clicked the article...and THERE I READ IT. Massive spoilers!! @JamesPage ? Why not putting behind brackes, at the start of the article [MASSIVE SPOILER] in capitals. Now I am spoiled by certain scenes X(. Al my fun regarding SPECTRE starts to diminish....

    I truly hate those hackers. The CIA needs to hunt those basterds down. But also, we really really need to warn more prominently if there are spoilers ahead. And this especially goes for the chief editor of MI6-HQ.com.

    So @JamesPage? Not like this:
    SPECTRE is 'massively over budget' according to Sony email leaks (spoilers)...

    But like this!:
    [BIG PLOT SPOILER AHEAD] SPECTRE is 'massively over budget' according to Sony email leaks...



    By the way, for what's worth it....and it's already a bit too late for me? We now know for sure that we need to admire Barbara Broccoli more. By jolly, she's a fighter. We now also know how much influence MGM has in the production budget, and how much they want to cut costs, by opting for more studio-filming instead of real on location shooting. Hence, a lot of doubling and not on-location shooting in Skyfall.

    At least Barbara is fighting her guts off to get REAL locations in the film...for us fans. Hail to Barbara (and certainly not to MGM)!
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    bondjames wrote: »
    I think they need another script rewrite, or fixup after this leak. What a mess.

    Are you insane? They have a finished screenplay and started filming two days ago. There is NO WAY they will rewrite the script.
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    I can type emails and post as fake Sony emails. Its a hoax...

    Seriously??? This article is coming from CNN and dozens of other sites have posted articles about these leaks. It's not a hoax.

    I am not referring to those but to the original poster. The others are not a hoax. Thanks for trying to be insulting.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    By the way, for what's worth it....and it's already a bit too late for me? We now know for sure that we need to admire Barbara Broccoli more. By jolly, she's a fighter. We now also know how much influence MGM has in the production budget, and how much they want to cut costs, by opting for more studio-filming instead of real on location shooting. Hence, a lot of doubling and not on-location shooting in Skyfall.

    At least Barbara is fighting her guts off to get REAL locations in the film...for us fans. Hail to Barbara (and certainly not to MGM)!

    Agreed fully @Gustav_Graves. I can only imagine what a mess Bond would be by now if not for the Broccoli family and EON. They've done this countless times (stood up for the franchise's integrity) in the face of studio accountants attempts to lower the quality in the face of budget pressures. My respect goes out to her and her father before her.
  • edited December 2014 Posts: 15,124
    Interesting. So Ejiofor from what I understand was not meant to be the villain, but Denbigh. Glad they didn't cast him, if he had a relatively minor role.
  • edited December 2014 Posts: 11,119
    The Sony leak has caught up with 'Spectre'! A number of emails have leaked between Barbara Broccoli and Amy Pascal revealing how the film is grossly over-budget.

    HEALTH WARNING: The last sentence includes potentially huge spoilers for 'Spectre'

    http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/10/technology/security/bond-movie-budget/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+rss/money_latest+(Latest+News)

    The Sony leak has caught up with both SPECTRE and SKYFALL. And in all honesty @Pierce2Daniel....I don't give a shit. I always stood up for more geopolitical relevance in Bond films. I actually love it. But the Sony hack is really scary. This is going to far.

    And because I'm motivated enough, because I admire the Bond franchise, I will boycot these SonyLeaks articles completely. They are damaging for the Bond franchise, damaging for the Bond fan community. And I welcome everyone who wants to join in boycotting such articles, that inevitably create UNFAIR and ILLEGAL spoilers.

    Spoilers are OK for me, but only if we fans do it via trusted and ethically entrusted sources.....not from sources from criminals.
  • MayDayDiVicenzoMayDayDiVicenzo Here and there
    Posts: 5,080

    Spoilers are OK for me, but only if we fans do it via trusted and ethically entrusted sources.....not from sources from criminals.

    Yep, I agree whole-heartedly with this.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591

    Spoilers are OK for me, but only if we fans do it via trusted and ethically entrusted sources.....not from sources from criminals.

    Yep, I agree whole-heartedly with this.
    Agreed.
  • O6GO6G
    Posts: 80
    Wish they would have picked someone else for the score. The score in Skyfall took me out of the James Bond vibe and into Harry Potter-ish places. Especially the fight on top of the train.
  • Totally agree @Gustav_Graves.
  • Posts: 4,619
    Yeah, I am extremely baffled that articles about the leaks containing heavy spoilers were posted on the main site. I thought mi6-hq was trying to have a good relationship with EON... It simply doesn't make any sense that official Bond photos can't be used as tiny avatar pictures but the people who run this site post news discussing stuff that was not meant to be seen by the public.
  • Yeah, I am extremely baffled that articles about the leaks containing heavy spoilers were posted on the main site. I thought mi6-hq was trying to have a good relationship with EON... It simply doesn't make any sense that official Bond photos can't be used as tiny avatar pictures but the people who run this site post news discussing stuff that was not meant to be seen by the public.

    Indeed. Man, there's already a "SPECTRE" glooming over us, watching us.... :|
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited December 2014 Posts: 23,883
    Sony head honcho Amy Pascale has had a lot of her emails leaked including some incendiary ones discussing Angelina Jolie that were released today.

    If this keeps up, she may have to go, because I don't think she can have credibility in the industry if all the personal conversations get out about others in the business.
  • Posts: 5,745
    I think A LOT of the content is fake, but the Sony hack is very real. I honestly doubt Sony has any say in the budget of the film. They're the distributor, I would think MGM and Eon take the hit when it comes to spending money. In my opinion, just because the hacks are real doesn't make any of this information 'confirmed'. It could just be one of us looking for a story.
  • Posts: 9,847
    Yeah, I am extremely baffled that articles about the leaks containing heavy spoilers were posted on the main site. I thought mi6-hq was trying to have a good relationship with EON... It simply doesn't make any sense that official Bond photos can't be used as tiny avatar pictures but the people who run this site post news discussing stuff that was not meant to be seen by the public.

    I am curious how you feel about Quantum and Spectre both returning in bond 24?

  • Posts: 4,619
    Risico007 wrote: »
    I am curious how you feel about Quantum and Spectre both returning in bond 24?

    Why are you asking? I am happy to see SPECTRE again in a Bond film and I'm ok with Quantum's return as long as it only has a minor presence in the movie. I simply want the movie either to completely stand on it's own or to be a sequel to Skyfall and Skyfall only. Obviously, if Quantum is back it means there will be some references to the events of CR and QOS. and that's OK as long as anyone who has only seen Skyfall can understand and enjoy the movie.
  • edited December 2014 Posts: 9,847
    well you were quite vocal about not wanting Quantum to return I am just curious I love Casino Royale and QOS and honestly my last viewing of Skyfall I found I enjoyed it a lot more then expected and rank it higher then some of Connery Moore and I am assuming brosnan (Die another day I am guessing will be toward the bottom of the barrel for me)


    Though with announcement of Quantum returning and the addition of Spectre I am honestly more excited about Spectre then I was about Skyfall..


    I now have a general question Spectre is not only the name of the orgnizastion but also of Chapter 5 of Ian Fleming's Thunderball novel Does this mean the Chapter title's are now fair game? Anyone want to comment on this.
  • chipstickschipsticks NOT on TheDanielCraigForum where they think know Daniel Craig personally and Léa and Monica are ugly
    edited December 2014 Posts: 560
    50 years old? ^:)^


    Catherine Deneuve, Isabelle Huppert, Charlotte Rampling still interpret sensual icons in advertising campaigns. And today 50-year-old women are genetically different from the 50-yer-old ladies from one or two generations ago. In other words, it’s finally clear a mature woman doesn’t loose her charm, she doesn’t stop being a female just because of her age. Actually she is female and sensual inasmuch adult. - Monica Bellucci for Vanity Fair Italy (December 2014)

    tumblr_nge2atgLWr1s3kgnuo4_500.png

    tumblr_nge2atgLWr1s3kgnuo1_500.png
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Risico007 wrote: »
    well you were quite vocal about not wanting Quantum to return I am just curious I love Casino Royale and QOS and honestly my last viewing of Skyfall I found I enjoyed it a lot more then expected and rank it higher then some of Connery Moore and I am assuming brosnan (Die another day I am guessing will be toward the bottom of the barrel for me)


    Though with announcement of Quantum returning and the addition of Spectre I am honestly more excited about Spectre then I was about Skyfall..


    I now have a general question Spectre is not only the name of the orgnizastion but also of Chapter 5 of Ian Fleming's Thunderball novel Does this mean the Chapter title's are now fair game? Anyone want to comment on this.

    I think chapter titles are fair game but it obviously depends if the title fits with what the story of the film is. The Craig era has taken many risks and EON have tinkered around with its own tradition with how they make the films and that definitely looks set to continue, such as casting a 50 year old Bond girl. That's a pretty big deal and really widens the net of casting potential actresses. There are so many new and interesting changes that the series is adopting and it's easy to conclude that Eon shouldn't have a problem with going for chapter titles to name their movies if they so wish to.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited December 2014 Posts: 23,883
    doubleoego wrote: »
    I think chapter titles are fair game but it obviously depends if the title fits with what the story of the film is. The Craig era has taken many risks and EON have tinkered around with its own tradition with how they make the films and that definitely looks set to continue, such as casting a 50 year old Bond girl. That's a pretty big deal and really widens the net of casting potential actresses. There are so many new and interesting changes that the series is adopting and it's easy to conclude that Eon shouldn't have a problem with going for chapter titles to name their movies if they so wish to.

    Excellent points.

    Got me thinking about EON in general and how much creative control they have, along with the directors and Craig, and how they are all stepping up and exercising that control.

    It's a great thing, because I'm sure that if MGM or Sony had control over Bond, Belluci would never have been cast (too old,.....past it.... etc.), nor would so many of the other great actors that have appeared over Craig's run. Mickelson? Almaric? Giannini? They would probably, like most large studios, have demanded someone more 'bankable'.

    It's a great time to be a Bond fan.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    bondjames wrote: »
    It's a great time to be a Bond fan.
    Oh Yeah!
    Yippie Kai Yea, Monica Lovers!
    ;)
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    bondjames wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    I think chapter titles are fair game but it obviously depends if the title fits with what the story of the film is. The Craig era has taken many risks and EON have tinkered around with its own tradition with how they make the films and that definitely looks set to continue, such as casting a 50 year old Bond girl. That's a pretty big deal and really widens the net of casting potential actresses. There are so many new and interesting changes that the series is adopting and it's easy to conclude that Eon shouldn't have a problem with going for chapter titles to name their movies if they so wish to.

    Excellent points.

    Got me thinking about EON in general and how much creative control they have, along with the directors and Craig, and how they are all stepping up and exercising that control.

    It's a great thing, because I'm sure that if MGM or Sony had control over Bond, Belluci would never have been cast (too old,.....past it.... etc.), nor would so many of the other great actors that have appeared over Craig's run. Mickelson? Almaric? Giannini? They would probably, like most large studios, have demanded someone more 'bankable'.

    It's a great time to be a Bond fan.

    Thanks.

    it most definitely is a great time to be a Bond fan and we need to savour it. This whole hacking business has apparently revealed issues EON had/has been facing with regards to budget and creative control from what little I gathered and I'm worried about Bond's future. I'm nervous at the possibility the successors to the Broccoli/Wilson team may not have the fortitude Cubby, Harry, Babs and Michael had/have. I really don't understand the logic of some people and when it comes to Bond there's more than enough history to mine to see what works and what doesn't. SPECTRE has to really be a colossal success and my respect for Babs has shot up astronomically especially when one remembers she was the one who fought to make Craig's casting happen.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,217
    Chipsticks ! Thanks for the breathtaking photos!
  • edited December 2014 Posts: 4,619
    @doubleoego Well said! I have an immense respect for the producers and escpecially Barbara Broccoli for being so courageous and pushing the envelope. Casino Royal and Skyfall could not have possibly happened if your average Hollywood executives were running the franchise. I'm really hoping the Bond franchise will stay a family business for at least another 50 years.

    By the way, a couple days ago a rewatched a great Sam Mendes interview from 2012 where he said that Barbara particularly is very keen on getting further into Bond as a person. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7LkmwxB_hY (around the 24 minute mark) Could it be possible that Michael G. Wilson is not completely on board with further exploring Bond's past in Spectre and that's why he stayed away from the press conference? Yeah, I realise that this is very wild speculation. :)
  • Posts: 1,680
    There trying to top Skyfall, and theres a good chance they will do it.

    This film is shaping up to be one of the best IMO.
  • bondjames wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    I think chapter titles are fair game but it obviously depends if the title fits with what the story of the film is. The Craig era has taken many risks and EON have tinkered around with its own tradition with how they make the films and that definitely looks set to continue, such as casting a 50 year old Bond girl. That's a pretty big deal and really widens the net of casting potential actresses. There are so many new and interesting changes that the series is adopting and it's easy to conclude that Eon shouldn't have a problem with going for chapter titles to name their movies if they so wish to.

    Excellent points.

    Got me thinking about EON in general and how much creative control they have, along with the directors and Craig, and how they are all stepping up and exercising that control.

    It's a great thing, because I'm sure that if MGM or Sony had control over Bond, Belluci would never have been cast (too old,.....past it.... etc.), nor would so many of the other great actors that have appeared over Craig's run. Mickelson? Almaric? Giannini? They would probably, like most large studios, have demanded someone more 'bankable'.

    It's a great time to be a Bond fan.

    Well said @bondjames and @doubleoego! I mean even Barbara Broccoli herself could pass as a Bond Girl. She is stunning and full of confidence.

    Have EON always had this kind of creative control? I am wondering how much they had during the Brosnan era. SP will be a very important Bond film I think, and I'm very excited for the Bond Girls of future films.
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
Sign In or Register to comment.