SPECTRE Production Timeline

16768707273870

Comments

  • Posts: 2,599
    doubleoego wrote:
    I like the fact that Mendes is returning because he's a great director, has great chemistry with the producers and principle actors, commands a higher caliber of top tier actors and acknowledges his weaknesses, this hopefully not making the same mistakes next time round as he on principle doesn't like to repeat making the same movie. I think we're in great hands with Mendes and I'm confident in believing we're going to get another good movie as Mendes first and foremost has never made a bad movie in his career imo.

    True, true. I just don't like what he's done and might do to the Moneypenny character. I also didn't like the manner in which it was revealed at the end of SF that Eve was Moneypenny. It just felt unnatural to me. I think it would have been better if one of the office staff (someone with good natural acting skills) who had recently been hired by MI6 knocked on her door and asked if she was Eve Moneypenny and said that he/she had been sent up to get some files or something like that. Anyway, I suppose the MP thing is for another thread.

  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited December 2013 Posts: 4,537
    I think there should be more carefull with spoilers. The fire at skyfall showing in the trailers or pictures be big mistake. Good be that there sugest it going to happend at the start in the teaser trailer, but from the moment it be confirmd it not be the beginning when you see the movie, you know it going to be at the end. It made the rest of the movie and inspecialy close to end boring.

    Before the movie we already know it be a house, extra suport by the fact The House is seen in the maintitle and with second or third view of the maintitle i notice that Bond escape from the ice also been seen the maintitle. Whyle before with Skyfall and inspecialy connected with CR and QOS the moost inportent meaning of it be the fall of Bond/Mi6 and the view to a kill. That view to a kill moment in China disapointed, Scotland whas nice and the best moment be the end. But the training of Bond in park been cut from the movie. We see almoost nothing from Bond strugle, exept the beginning a litle bit and the end disapointed. Atleast the maintitle predict live and death and since i believe every Daniel Craig era maintitle predict the next or next 2 movies i have some hope.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited December 2013 Posts: 41,011
    Well it's obvious that they really, really wanted Mendes to return if they chose to wait for him to fulfill his theater duties before doing 'Bond 24.'

    As for spoilers, yes, I feel that a whole lot was leaked and it ruined it for many people, including myself. Didn't people outline the entire film based off of clapperboards, production notes, images, etc.?
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Bounine wrote:
    doubleoego wrote:
    I like the fact that Mendes is returning because he's a great director, has great chemistry with the producers and principle actors, commands a higher caliber of top tier actors and acknowledges his weaknesses, this hopefully not making the same mistakes next time round as he on principle doesn't like to repeat making the same movie. I think we're in great hands with Mendes and I'm confident in believing we're going to get another good movie as Mendes first and foremost has never made a bad movie in his career imo.

    True, true. I just don't like what he's done and might do to the Moneypenny character. I also didn't like the manner in which it was revealed at the end of SF that Eve was Moneypenny. It just felt unnatural to me. I think it would have been better if one of the office staff (someone with good natural acting skills) who had recently been hired by MI6 knocked on her door and asked if she was Eve Moneypenny and said that he/she had been sent up to get some files or something like that. Anyway, I suppose the MP thing is for another thread.

    Yeah, SF wasn't without its faults and I think some if the things you mentioned could be some of the issues Mendes was talking about in terms of mistakes and things he wishes he could have changed. That being said, I think the MP reveal was a bit clunky as well as Bond's, "with pleasure, M; with pleasure" line. There are numerous things I hope Mendes improves upon and approaches differently for Bond 24 but simultaneously I still on the whole feel like we're going to recurve a fantastic movie.
  • edited December 2013 Posts: 2,599
    I think Mendes needs to work on the humour. Some of the ones liners just don't really work with Craig. The humour in CR harmonised much better I thought with not only Craig's portrayal of the character but his acting skills and style. Some of the humour frustrates me in SF. It's a pity it wasn't handled better. Still, SF is a good film on the whole but some of the humour on Craig's part in this film will always bother me a little.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    Bounine wrote:
    I think Mendes needs to work on the humour. Some of the ones liners just don't really work with Craig. The humour in CR harmonised much better I thought with not only Craig's portrayal of the character but his acting skills and style. Some of the humour frustrates me in SF. It's a pity it wasn't handled better. Still, SF is a good film on the whole but some of the humour on Craig's part in this film will always bother me a little.

    Agreed. It had some good comedic moments in it (not sure if it was intentional, but the drunken gaze Craig gives when M turns on the lights in her flat is hilarious), but a lot of it was very forced and awkward.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    edited December 2013 Posts: 1,257
    Bounine wrote:
    True, true. I just don't like what he's done and might do to the Moneypenny character. I also didn't like the manner in which it was revealed at the end of SF that Eve was Moneypenny. It just felt unnatural to me. I think it would have been better if one of the office staff (someone with good natural acting skills) who had recently been hired by MI6 knocked on her door and asked if she was Eve Moneypenny and said that he/she had been sent up to get some files or something like that. Anyway, I suppose the MP thing is for another thread.

    Did we even know Moneypenny's first name prior to that moment in the office?
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,480
    The "For Originals ..." thread now has really great background info on darn near every aspect of Skyfall. You may want to check it out; M's name is discussed.
    EDIT: Here is that section from SirHenry's thread, about M's name:
    ***


    M's name is "Olivia Mansfield." A 2013 props exhibition revealed her full name to be visible in an inscription on the box given to Bond from Eve containing M's porcelain bulldog figurine. In 1995, the original script for GoldenEye had revealed M's name as "Barbara Mawdsley," but this was before the James Bond series "reboot" with Casino Royale, so Judi Dench's interpretation of M is likely two different characters. Curiously, "Olivia" is Dench's middle name, and the first head of the British Secret Service was (George) Mansfield Smith-Cummings (known by the first letter of his last name "C"). According to fellow spy novelist 'John Le Carré', Ian Fleming (ever tongue in cheek), designated the head of SIS as "M", using instead Cummings' first name. Keeping the Mansfield here as a surname is a twist but not intended in any of Fleming's original works. Fleming's "Man With the Golden Gun" gave his M's name as Miles Messervy.
    ***
    But there is a ton of other info, also; well worth reading.


    Here is the info from SirHenry's thread (and I will quit copying now; just go read the thread, it is chockfull of info). :
    Naomie Harris is the fourth actress in the official series to play Miss Moneypenny. Harris' Moneypenny is called Eve making her characterization the first time in the official series that the character has had a first name. The character had been on a 10 year hiatus since Die Another Day. Harris is also the first black actress to play the part. Lois Maxwell first played Moneypenny in 14 Bond films between 1962 and 1985 through all of the Connery, Lazenby and Moore movies. Maxwell was then followed by Caroline Bliss for two films during the Dalton era and then Samantha Bond for four films during the Brosnan era. 'Skyfall' represents the first time that Miss Moneypenny is a fully-fledged main Bond Girl and not a supporting character.
  • edited December 2013 Posts: 2,599
    Bounine wrote:
    True, true. I just don't like what he's done and might do to the Moneypenny character. I also didn't like the manner in which it was revealed at the end of SF that Eve was Moneypenny. It just felt unnatural to me. I think it would have been better if one of the office staff (someone with good natural acting skills) who had recently been hired by MI6 knocked on her door and asked if she was Eve Moneypenny and said that he/she had been sent up to get some files or something like that. Anyway, I suppose the MP thing is for another thread.

    Did we even know Moneypenny's first name prior to that moment in the office?

    Maybe not, in which case the office worker in my suggestion should merely say "Ms. Moneypenny?". This would be better I think. Too late for that now anyway. LOL.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Bounine wrote:
    I think Mendes needs to work on the humour. Some of the ones liners just don't really work with Craig. The humour in CR harmonised much better I thought with not only Craig's portrayal of the character but his acting skills and style. Some of the humour frustrates me in SF. It's a pity it wasn't handled better. Still, SF is a good film on the whole but some of the humour on Craig's part in this film will always bother me a little.

    I do think the humour in CR is the best in all 3 of Craig's Bond movies but I thought the humour in SF was pretty good overall in fact I can at the moment only think of a few instances where they dropped the ball:

    Craig's circle of life quip

    Craig's gas explosion in London line

    Bardem's Dialogue when he's climbing up the ladder to escape the underground and blows open a hole in the ceiling above

    I think that's about it. Have to rewatch it soon.

  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,257
    Bounine wrote:
    Bounine wrote:
    True, true. I just don't like what he's done and might do to the Moneypenny character. I also didn't like the manner in which it was revealed at the end of SF that Eve was Moneypenny. It just felt unnatural to me. I think it would have been better if one of the office staff (someone with good natural acting skills) who had recently been hired by MI6 knocked on her door and asked if she was Eve Moneypenny and said that he/she had been sent up to get some files or something like that. Anyway, I suppose the MP thing is for another thread.

    Did we even know Moneypenny's first name prior to that moment in the office?

    Maybe not, in which case the office worker in my suggestion should merely say "Ms. Moneypenny?". This would be better I think. Too late for that now anyway. LOL.

    What I'm driving at is Bond and her spent all that time together in the field and Bond didn't even know her first name yet. I mean, what the hell was he calling for all that time? I don't know why but this aspect just irks me. We should have known her name was Eve throughout the film.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    Wow, I just realized that we, as an audience, knew her name was Eve, but not once did Bond know it throughout the film until after all of that time when he found out in the office. How did he not know?
  • Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow, I just realized that we, as an audience, knew her name was Eve, but not once did Bond know it throughout the film until after all of that time when he found out in the office. How did he not know?

    I don't know. He's in the car with her, and he knows Ronson's name, but he doesn't know hers. You'd also think he'd want to know the name of the person who shot him, but it seems not.

    It would have been better if he'd only known her as Eve (which would still be a bit odd, but significantly less dumb), and only decided to call her Miss Moneypenny at the end, when she became a secretary.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    If he knows Ronson and she knows his name, then I can only assume he knows hers and it was merely convenient that he didn't say it at all. Makes me wonder if her 'Eve...Eve Moneypenny' line at the end is just mocking his 'Bond...James Bond' line.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    She said it that way because they had never been "formally" introduced, that's all. ;)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    That's putting it mildly. I would assume if you were going on a mission with someone else - someone that will have your back - you'd at least know their full name.
  • She said it that way because they had never been "formally" introduced, that's all. ;)

    In any event, I think it would better have been for him to call her Eve, in order to (hopefully) throw us off the scent a little, not to mention that it would make far more sense.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,480
    So of course they knew each other's full names.
    They were just playing with each other.

    Mendes obviously wanted to reveal Eve as Moneypenny right at the end; and I do agree with that.
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    Posts: 1,257
    Did we know the first names to all the other Moneypennys? From what I have read, only Samantha Bond's character had a known first name of Eve.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    So of course they knew each other's full names.
    They were just playing with each other.

    Mendes obviously wanted to reveal Eve as Moneypenny right at the end; and I do agree with that.

    But he did it in the most clunky, implausible way imaginable.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited December 2013 Posts: 12,480
    @Seven_Point_Six_Five, Just look up a bit at my earlier post; there were no first names in the films before Skyfall for Moneypenny.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    I think they could've went about unveiling it a little better without making other events look implausible.
  • edited December 2013 Posts: 6,396
    It's just a poorly conceived plot point to allow a final "twist" with her revealing herself as Miss Moneypenny. The irony of course is that we all knew who she was before we'd even watched the film for the first time. Lazy writing, which is a shame because overall the script is rather excellent but plot holes like that and Silva's escape plan do annoy me because it's almost like they're treating the audience with contempt.
  • M_BaljeM_Balje Amsterdam, Netherlands
    edited December 2013 Posts: 4,537
    From the moment we see her shooting in the trailer that on that moment Naomi Harris be Moneypenny remour be trown overboard, if not already be for some people. I never take it as fact as i did with M die remour. It comes as big suprises after a long time of no Eve or another girl on screen. I expect she mabey wil return at the end to go on mission with him or saved him. The focus be on ''M'' (from the start it be waiting on when she going to die and whyle the court scene with her be good, we know she not going to die there because we stil must see footage that already be spoiled.) and that also not end like as it should be. So it not only be that stuped ending.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,356
    It's just a poorly conceived plot point to allow a final "twist" with her revealing herself as Miss Moneypenny. The irony of course is that we all knew who she was before we'd even watched the film for the first time. Lazy writing, which is a shame because overall the script is rather excellent but plot holes like that and Silva's escape plan do annoy me because it's almost like they're treating the audience with contempt.

    It's not a plot hole because you've decided to read the spoilers. Many members of the public had no idea when they first saw the film who she actually was.
  • Samuel001 wrote:
    It's just a poorly conceived plot point to allow a final "twist" with her revealing herself as Miss Moneypenny. The irony of course is that we all knew who she was before we'd even watched the film for the first time. Lazy writing, which is a shame because overall the script is rather excellent but plot holes like that and Silva's escape plan do annoy me because it's almost like they're treating the audience with contempt.

    It's not a plot hole because you've decided to read the spoilers. Many members of the public had no idea when they first saw the film who she actually was.

    I don't think it was too difficult to guess, even without reading the spoilers (or all the rumors).
  • Seven_Point_Six_FiveSeven_Point_Six_Five Southern California
    edited December 2013 Posts: 1,257
    @Seven_Point_Six_Five, Just look up a bit at my earlier post; there were no first names in the films before Skyfall for Moneypenny.

    Interesting. I don't remember where I read that Samantha Bond's Moneypenny was named Eve but I trust your post more than my mysterious source.

    Anyway, if Skyfall were up to me, I would have set up her character with the name Evelyn from the get go. Throughout the film, both Bond and the audience would know her as Evelyn. In the final scene, Bond would say "You know Evelyn, we haven't been properly introduced". She replies, "Oh, well you can call me Eve. Eve Moneypenny".
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    The difference from the Brosnan films, though, was that we knew she was MP the secretary, we didn't question her first name. It's an issue in SF because they went on some missions together and her name is just brought up after all of that at the end.

    @Seven_Point_Six_Five has it spot on in terms of how I would've handled it. Bring her name up a few times, then tackle that at the end. Still goes against the 'not knowing what her last name is' bit, but still.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    Posts: 13,356
    Samuel001 wrote:
    It's just a poorly conceived plot point to allow a final "twist" with her revealing herself as Miss Moneypenny. The irony of course is that we all knew who she was before we'd even watched the film for the first time. Lazy writing, which is a shame because overall the script is rather excellent but plot holes like that and Silva's escape plan do annoy me because it's almost like they're treating the audience with contempt.

    It's not a plot hole because you've decided to read the spoilers. Many members of the public had no idea when they first saw the film who she actually was.

    I don't think it was too difficult to guess, even without reading the spoilers (or all the rumors).

    Well, like I said, many people coming out of the first showings I went to were talking about it on the way out, there is certainly no flat out giveaway in the film for it. If you were someone who went online, well that's a different matter altogether.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    I'm in the same boat: I heard tons of people walking out after the midnight showing, talking about it. It might be obvious to some people who did searching online, but even for me, it wasn't obvious until someone online spoiled it. I know we spoke of it here before, but there wasn't a guarantee, though the article I posted when I first joined this site back in 2011 was the rumor of Harris playing MP.
Sign In or Register to comment.