› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…773774776778779…870

Comments

  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited September 2015 Posts: 11,139
    Definitely picking this up
  • 5815892458158924 Valencia (Spain)
    Posts: 30
    fantastic, I have a desire that send me home, and I am subscriber of the Empire in Spain
  • ManInCableCarManInCableCar
    Posts: 161
    Gold ring! Awesome! \:D/
  • antovolkantovolk
    Posts: 3,164
    Le Cercle is reporting that the full cast will be in Rome for a premiere on October 27....which makes zero sense because of the Zurich premiere the same evening?
  • RC7RC7
    edited September 2015 Posts: 10,512
    antovolk wrote: »
    Le Cercle is reporting that the full cast will be in Rome for a premiere on October 27....which makes zero sense because of the Zurich premiere the same evening?

    Perhaps the Zurich premiere won't feature the cast. It makes sense they would be in Rome.
  • antovolkantovolk
    Posts: 3,164
    RC7 wrote: »
    antovolk wrote: »
    Le Cercle is reporting that the full cast will be in Rome for a premiere on October 27....which makes zero sense because of the Zurich premiere the same evening?

    Perhaps the Zurich premiere won't feature the cast. It makes sense they would be in Rome.

    JasonBond did mention cast members will be there but he can't say who....maybe a couple of the supporting cast while the main cast is in Rome
  • skullkrusherskullkrusher
    edited September 2015 Posts: 212
    Omega publishes SPECTRE edition of Lifetime magazine:

    http://lifetime.omegawatches.com/detail/15

  • nobodydoesitbetternobodydoesitbetter
    Posts: 1,021
    SPECTRE the first film of the Craig era to get a 5 star rating from EMPIRE???

    Casino Royale ****
    Quantum Of Solace ****
    Skyfall ****
    Spectre ***** ???
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    nobodydoesitbetter wrote: »
    SPECTRE the first film of the Craig era to get a 5 star rating from EMPIRE???

    Casino Royale ****
    Quantum Of Solace ****
    Skyfall ****
    Spectre ***** ???

    You're making that up no :-)?
  • nobodydoesitbetternobodydoesitbetter
    Posts: 1,021
    Questioning if Spectre will be the first film to get the red 5 stars from EMPIRE. The previous 3 managed to get 4 stars each during their release. Could Spectre be the first to get 5 stars??
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    antovolk wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    antovolk wrote: »
    Le Cercle is reporting that the full cast will be in Rome for a premiere on October 27....which makes zero sense because of the Zurich premiere the same evening?



    Perhaps the Zurich premiere won't feature the cast. It makes sense they would be in Rome.

    JasonBond did mention cast members will be there but he can't say who....maybe a couple of the supporting cast while the main cast is in Rome

    That's strange because the full cast being in Rome is not possible. Do you have a link to that news story?
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    If I remember rightly when they reviewed the Skyfall Blu ray they gave the film 5 stars.
  • nobodydoesitbetternobodydoesitbetter
    edited September 2015 Posts: 1,021
    Shardlake wrote: »
    If I remember rightly when they reviewed the Skyfall Blu ray they gave the film 5 stars.

    i think they usually do that when they realise that they should have given a film 5 stars when they reviewed it originally. According to the EMPIRE website CR, QOS and SF were all reviewed by the same reviewer Kim Newman and all got 4 stars (i am assuming that these reviews are the original release reviews)



  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    QoS and SF being rated equally to CR, particularly the former really calls Empire's rating into question.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    doubleoego wrote: »
    QoS and SF being rated equally to CR, particularly the former really calls Empire's rating into question.

    Yep. Empire has gone downhill imo. They're in bed with Hollywood to the point where critical analysis is non-existent.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    RC7 wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    QoS and SF being rated equally to CR, particularly the former really calls Empire's rating into question.

    Yep. Empire has gone downhill imo. They're in bed with Hollywood to the point where critical analysis is non-existent.

    I agree
  • nobodydoesitbetternobodydoesitbetter
    Posts: 1,021
    RC7 wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    QoS and SF being rated equally to CR, particularly the former really calls Empire's rating into question.

    Yep. Empire has gone downhill imo. They're in bed with Hollywood to the point where critical analysis is non-existent.

    especially if its directed by a certain Christopher Nolan...

  • antovolkantovolk
    Posts: 3,164
  • bondsumbondsum
    Posts: 3,333
    nobodydoesitbetter wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    If I remember rightly when they reviewed the Skyfall Blu ray they gave the film 5 stars.

    i think they usually do that when they realise that they should have given a film 5 stars when they reviewed it originally. According to the EMPIRE website CR, QOS and SF were all reviewed by the same reviewer Kim Newman and all got 4 stars (i am assuming that these reviews are the original release reviews)

    I had the pleasure of sitting next to Kim Newman at the press screening of QoS and recall after it had finished he remarked, "Yes it's good, but why can't they make Bond films fun again?" Draw your own conclusions.
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    Loved the new EMPIRE cover. WHY on earth Sony/EON didn't used this layout for the poster? Having a huge name like Waltz, it would make much more sense for commercial purposes to advertise the film with both actors.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited September 2015 Posts: 11,119
    antovolk wrote: »

    And here are the other three production video's, promoted by Jaguar and Land Rover, and released during the I.A.A. Motor Show in Frankfurt, Germany:

    Behind the scenes of the Austria/Sölden car chase (Land Rover):


    Behind the scenes of the Italy/Rome car chase (Jaguar):


    Behind the scenes of the "SPECTRE"-event (Jaguar):


    Bespoke Land Rovers for Austria car chase (Land Rover):
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    I am very excited about the orange Jaguar!!
    I love cars and the last time they had such an amazing car was in Die Another Day, I have them all as models! I sure hope they will release the new ones too as models! Does anybody know??
  • SirGodfreySirGodfrey France
    Posts: 25
    marketto007 wrote: »
    Loved the new EMPIRE cover. WHY on earth Sony/EON didn't used this layout for the poster? Having a huge name like Waltz, it would make much more sense for commercial purposes to advertise the film with both actors.

    The truth. Waltz should have been on the poster.

  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    SirGodfrey wrote: »
    marketto007 wrote: »
    Loved the new EMPIRE cover. WHY on earth Sony/EON didn't used this layout for the poster? Having a huge name like Waltz, it would make much more sense for commercial purposes to advertise the film with both actors.

    The truth. Waltz should have been on the poster.

    Obviously not.

    What if you saw Blofeld's face on the "YOLT" poster?? For me that's too much of a spoiler. Moreover, if you look to many previous Bond posters, the villain is never on it! So let's keep that tradition ;-).
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited September 2015 Posts: 11,139
    We all know who the villain is, it's not meant to be a secret or built up to be some big reveal. You cant compare Waltz with Pleasence because up until YOLT Blofeld was some faceless superboss. These are different times. It doesn't detract by putting Waltz who's a big name in his own right on the poster but I suppose it's not THAT big a deal if he's not.

  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,593
    doubleoego wrote: »
    We all know who the villain is, it's not meant to be a secret or built up to be some big reveal. You cant compare Waltz with Pleasence because up until YOLT Blofeld was some faceless superboss. These are different times. It doesn't detract by putting Waltz who's a big name in his own right on the poster but I suppose it's not THAT big a deal if he's not.

    Nailed it. Also Silva had a character poster, at least.

    I can't wait to see what the subscriber cover looks like!
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    The trailers already quite clearly reveal what role Waltz is playing, despite his denials.

  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    doubleoego wrote: »
    We all know who the villain is, it's not meant to be a secret or built up to be some big reveal. You cant compare Waltz with Pleasence because up until YOLT Blofeld was some faceless superboss. These are different times. It doesn't detract by putting Waltz who's a big name in his own right on the poster but I suppose it's not THAT big a deal if he's not.

    Why?

    Raoul Silva wasn't on the "SF"-poster
    Dominic Greene wasn't on the "QOS"-poster
    Le Chiffre wasn't on the "CR"-poster
    Alec Trevelyan wasn't on the "GE"-poster
    Franz Sanchez wasn't on the "LTK"-poster
    Blofeld was ONLY on the "OHMSS"-poster, but never made an appearance on the other posters.

    I guess you're right to say that post 9/11 these are different times. But these different times include actually not showing the villain on a poster on one of the Craig films...
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,593
    bondjames wrote: »
    The trailers already quite clearly reveal what role Waltz is playing, despite his denials.

    Yes, and Sam Smith saying that under no uncertain terms was he NOT doing the Bond theme just shows that everyone involved with the production is a filthy liar ;)
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    We all know who the villain is, it's not meant to be a secret or built up to be some big reveal. You cant compare Waltz with Pleasence because up until YOLT Blofeld was some faceless superboss. These are different times. It doesn't detract by putting Waltz who's a big name in his own right on the poster but I suppose it's not THAT big a deal if he's not.

    Why?

    Raoul Silva wasn't on the "SF"-poster
    Dominic Greene wasn't on the "QOS"-poster
    Le Chiffre wasn't on the "CR"-poster
    Alec Trevelyan wasn't on the "GE"-poster
    Franz Sanchez wasn't on the "LTK"-poster
    Blofeld was ONLY on the "OHMSS"-poster, but never made an appearance on the other posters.

    I guess you're right to say that post 9/11 these are different times. But these different times include actually not showing the villain on a poster on one of the Craig films...

    9/11 doesn't have anything to do with it really. It's a simple case of making a commercial decision to utilise a popular and critically acclaimed actor (2 time Oscar winner, I know you love your Oscar accolades references)to help market a movie many would argue he was born to be a part of. This, of course doesn't have to follow the trend of what Bond posters have been like in the past. If the series was strictly beholden to tge past tge series would have died out decades ago. There's no harm in a little change and even the Craig era proves that.
Sign In or Register to comment.