It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
--> Roger Deakins: Out
--> Wally Pfister: In !!!
As previously mentioned, Pfister is a director nowadays.
He's also a bit of a douche.
I'd give a +1 to Hoyt Van Hoytema too.
I wouldn't complain at that suggestion, he's Nolan's replacement for Wally Pfister on Interstellar.
His cinematography on Tinker is superb, maybe even get Alberto Iglesias to do the score.
Love to see Oldman in Bond, not a villain though more an ally, the same goes for Christoph Waltz, not a villain something more interesting.
This is from March last year, so nearly a year go. Are there are new rumors at all about Adele returning? I am curious.
http://www.flickchart.com/blog/adele-to-record-theme-for-bond-24
Ashamed to say I hadn't heard of who this was until I saw some comments on another film site about Deakins not returning. I think Hoytema would be amazing, 'Tinker Tailor' was stellar work.
But, yes, Hoytema would be preferable to Kuras.
I would support Adele's return. She may be the new Bassey.
I second that.
Maybe they can name the villain after Hote van Hoytema while they're at it.
Source: http://www.rogerdeakins.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2842&sid=dc614b3759334c26fcee4efdc9c900e4
SF was a very directed film and it's interesting that Mendes has a clear story about how to move that story forward. I really think this film will be akin to Nolan's Dark Knight films. An auter director coming in and planting his stamp on a cultural icon.
Agreed. The fact that Mendes said that he "put everything he ever wanted to put into a Bond movie into Skyfall" makes me really happy that he decided to return after all because it means that now he has his ultimate dream Bond film behind him and can be more experimental with the next one. I really expect the next one to be more "Mendesian" than Skyfall.
Roger Deakins wrote that Mendes "has a very definite story he wants to tell". This indicates that BOND 24 won't be a run off the mill Bond film like QOS or most of the Bond films between OHMSS and CR. Skyfall had an excellent cast and crew, probably the best in the series. The only thing that needs to be improved upon is the script and I feel that Bond 24 will have a better and much more unique screenplay. Hopefully the cast and crew will be just as good as Skyfall's. (Although getting a cinematographer just as good as Deakins on boad is probably not an easy task - not even for Sam Mendes.)
May I ask you where this belief stems from? For all we know it were Logans additions to the script that made Skyfalls story such a unbearable intellect insulting mess.
So maybe they should call it Skyfall part 2?
This whole "has a very definite story he wants to tell" part to me is simply frightening!
I'd say that's the pre-requisite of any director. Knowing the story you want to tell. Whether it'll be good, is to be seen, but I'd rather this, than having the Mendes departure and another director signing on for something they aren't fully invested in.
What do you mean by that? I think it's great to have a director with a vision on board.
It would be indeed, if this Vision had something to do with logic and coherence and not having a MO that seems to consist of "Hey, I wish we had ...." like apparently with the DB5 and (I strongly suspect )Harris= MP and,and,and ...
I wish we had Tony Gilroy....
For Bond 24 though I will have faith.
Deakins has already answered this.