The DANIEL CRAIG Appreciation thread - Discuss His Life, His Career, His Bond Films

1149150152154155176

Comments

  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,152
    Chalet Girl rules!
  • Posts: 7,419
    Recently caught up with two Craig films, Flashbacks Of A Fool and Enduring Love

    Both really good interesting films. I preferred Flashbacks even though Daniel only really bookends the film. A good performance from the lad playing Craig's younger self. Also a good early performance from Felicity Jones. The film uses the Roxy Music track, 'If there is something' in a way that's integral to the film.

    Both films were made either side of CR.

    I really liked 'Enduring Love', mate.
    Fantastic opening sequence with the hot air balloon!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,996
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Recently caught up with two Craig films, Flashbacks Of A Fool and Enduring Love

    Both really good interesting films. I preferred Flashbacks even though Daniel only really bookends the film. A good performance from the lad playing Craig's younger self. Also a good early performance from Felicity Jones. The film uses the Roxy Music track, 'If there is something' in a way that's integral to the film.

    Both films were made either side of CR.

    I really liked 'Enduring Love', mate.
    Fantastic opening sequence with the hot air balloon!

    Yes, that sequence was incredibly well shot. I wasn't massively endeared with the film, but it's very watchable and all the cast are brilliant.
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,018
    Would have still loved to see what Roger Michell would have done with QoS.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,585
    Recently caught up with two Craig films, Flashbacks Of A Fool and Enduring Love

    Both really good interesting films. I preferred Flashbacks even though Daniel only really bookends the film. A good performance from the lad playing Craig's younger self. Also a good early performance from Felicity Jones. The film uses the Roxy Music track, 'If there is something' in a way that's integral to the film.

    Both films were made either side of CR.

    The use of that Roxy Music track is brilliant. Flashbacks of a Fool is an uneven film, but it has several good moments. DC's scene in the restaurant with Mark Strong is especially noteworthy. And what's interesting is that the film's opening scenes were shot in South Africa, not Malibu.

  • Posts: 7,419
    Would have still loved to see what Roger Michell would have done with QoS.

    Yes, but i reckon the pace would have been more languid! He was offered CR too in the early stages too, before Paul Haggis did a rewrite and rejected Purvis and Wades early draft!
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,152
    Haggis was asked to direct QOS too. If he'd been both writer and director, I wonder if he'd've tried to dig his heels in when EON rejected his completed 'Bond takes Vesper's young daughter to an Albanian orphanage' script?
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,018
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Would have still loved to see what Roger Michell would have done with QoS.

    Yes, but i reckon the pace would have been more languid! He was offered CR too in the early stages too, before Paul Haggis did a rewrite and rejected Purvis and Wades early draft!

    Yeah, you're right. His style would have been more slow burn.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,383
    Tricky to know where to put this, but it's nice to see the band back together.



  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    Posts: 2,018
    That's almost nostalgic @mtm love it!
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,629
    mtm wrote: »
    Tricky to know where to put this, but it's nice to see the band back together.



    Another person that should have been on stage with them.

  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,183
    Someone should get John Constantine to pay a visit to Daniel Craig’s home because I’m pretty sure his wife is currently possessed by a succubus
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,968
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,383
    Thank you! That looks an absolute hoot.

    Fun Bond connection as well- Rian Johnson appears to be wearing a Hamilton Pulsar watch: as worn by Sir Roger at the beginning of Live and Let Die :D
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2022 Posts: 16,383
    Thanks to Prime I just gave TWINE a bit of a go, but got a bit bored I’m afraid, and switched to Casino Royale, and my gosh it still has it. Craig’s Bond is just so exciting, he feels like a real(ish) person, especially closely compared to Brosnan’s cartoon character. Just the right level of jokes without spoiling the spell too… Nothing wrong with cartoons in the right place, but it’s so easy to see why audiences just connected with Craig and this Bond straight away. Absolutely electric.
    I’m kind of amazed the Broccolis are sticking with Bond in a way rather than retiring: you look at this and think they proved their point.

    Also: the scene in Bond’s room with Caterina Murino: probably the sexiest in any Bond film?
  • mtm wrote: »
    Thanks to Prime I just gave TWINE a bit of a go, but got a bit bored I’m afraid, and switched to Casino Royale, and my gosh it still has it. Craig’s Bond is just so exciting, he feels like a real(ish) person, especially closely compared to Brosnan’s cartoon character. Just the right level of jokes without spoiling the spell too… Nothing wrong with cartoons in the right place, but it’s so easy to see why audiences just connected with Craig and this Bond straight away. Absolutely electric.
    I’m kind of amazed the Broccolis are sticking with Bond in a way rather than retiring: you look at this and think they proved their point.

    Also: the scene in Bond’s room with Caterina Murino: probably the sexiest in any Bond film?

    It’s certainly my favorite of the Craig era, and perhaps my favorite of the entire series. Then again, it’s hard for me to choose between CR, FRWL, OHMSS, and Goldeneye personally. They all battle for that #1 spot in my rankings.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    I dunno @MI6HQ , my wife and I were in the front row three weeks ago. He looked nice and lean then-- the white shirt he wore a
    mtm wrote: »
    Thanks to Prime I just gave TWINE a bit of a go, but got a bit bored I’m afraid, and switched to Casino Royale, and my gosh it still has it. Craig’s Bond is just so exciting, he feels like a real(ish) person, especially closely compared to Brosnan’s cartoon character. Just the right level of jokes without spoiling the spell too… Nothing wrong with cartoons in the right place, but it’s so easy to see why audiences just connected with Craig and this Bond straight away. Absolutely electric.
    I’m kind of amazed the Broccolis are sticking with Bond in a way rather than retiring: you look at this and think they proved their point.

    Also: the scene in Bond’s room with Caterina Murino: probably the sexiest in any Bond film?

    My heart banged around in my chest reading this. Yes, electric is the best way to describe Craig; he exploded out of the gate.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,641
    Spot on @mtm mate. I'll never forget that feeling I had walking out of seeing Casino, it sounds ridiculous now but I never thought a new Bond film could be that amazing. It still feels fresh today

    The other feeling I had was is Daniel my favourite Bond. It was crazy to think after one viewing I could even imagine him as my favourite, but he just had it and made it look effortless. He made Bond human but he still felt like the coolest man alive

    I wish I could go back to 2006 and see Casino Royale with fresh eyes again. My favourite cinema experience in my life
  • VenutiusVenutius Yorkshire
    Posts: 3,152
    Yes, absolutely. That first viewing of CR and the sense of almost disbelief on the way out that it could be that good. Looks like a lot of us had the same reaction!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,996
    mtm wrote: »
    Thanks to Prime I just gave TWINE a bit of a go, but got a bit bored I’m afraid, and switched to Casino Royale, and my gosh it still has it. Craig’s Bond is just so exciting, he feels like a real(ish) person, especially closely compared to Brosnan’s cartoon character. Just the right level of jokes without spoiling the spell too… Nothing wrong with cartoons in the right place, but it’s so easy to see why audiences just connected with Craig and this Bond straight away. Absolutely electric.
    I’m kind of amazed the Broccolis are sticking with Bond in a way rather than retiring: you look at this and think they proved their point.

    Also: the scene in Bond’s room with Caterina Murino: probably the sexiest in any Bond film?

    I must say, after seeing CR for the first time and Daniel Craig owning the role, it made the Brosnan films seem rather 'flyweight'
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,383
    Venutius wrote: »
    Yes, absolutely. That first viewing of CR and the sense of almost disbelief on the way out that it could be that good. Looks like a lot of us had the same reaction!

    Yeah it's tricky to imagine a follow-up on that, isn't it? Many folks put it down to Fleming, but I can imagine a Roger adaptation of that, him suavely breezing through the whole thing. I think it's down to the writers, producers, director and star.
    He's so good, though. I've finished now and I don't think anyone would be wrong to say he's the best Bond.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited October 2022 Posts: 7,547
    On the same coin one understands the uphill climb QOS had to try and reach the bar CR set, along with everything else that was working against that film. I’d say it did an extremely admirable job considering everything, and I’m glad it’s only getting more and more appreciated with time.

    Might have to throw on CR tonight.
  • HildebrandRarityHildebrandRarity Centre international d'assistance aux personnes déplacées, Paris, France
    Posts: 482
    Sean Connery and Daniel Craig are the only actors that are, to me, the perfect match for the part, each in his own particular way. The other Bonds had some great moments, and were often in good or even great entries, but I can't shake the feeling that they were basically placeholders for the part at a time these films were regularly made and needed a lead. That's the power of such a strong franchise. Just like opera halls can still stage a great Tosca or Siegfried even when the lead singer isn't the one-in-a-generation performer who can show up for such a part. The actual singer has definitely some merits, and the rest of the production can still be interesting.
    But when, for a Bond, there's a Sean Connery or a Daniel Craig onscreen, it doesn't take more than a minute to make you feel grateful there's an entire film, or a series of films built around them. You can't take your eyes out of them, they're nearly mesmerizing, even when the rest of the film isn't necessarily up to the standards.

    (Disclaimer: This doesn't necessarily apply when they're on sleepwalking mode, like for YOLT, DAF or parts of Spectre)
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2022 Posts: 16,383
    Sean Connery and Daniel Craig are the only actors that are, to me, the perfect match for the part, each in his own particular way.

    Can't entirely disagree. I love Roger and he perhaps remains my favourite, but there's an argument that he's basically playing a character called 'Roger Moore 007'.
    Connery and Craig are both cinematic forces of nature, in a way.

    I think I'd disagree that Connery is sleepwalking in DAF though; I think he's in full movie star mode, if perhaps not full 007 mode. He's earning his money.
  • edited October 2022 Posts: 784
    I do agree with Craig and Connery having an unmatched x-factor in their early films. Roger came close when he lightened up, but every actor started slipping away from the character towards their later films, except for Brosnan, who to me was the only consistent one.

    A lot of it has to do with direction.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    edited October 2022 Posts: 4,629
    I do agree with Craig and Connery having an unmatched x-factor in their early films. Roger came close when he lightened up, but every actor started slipping away from the character towards their later films, except for Brosnan, who to me was the only consistent one.

    A lot of it has to do with direction.

    I agree about PB and direction. PB always was great with the material, no matter how bad it was. It’s also unique about his directors, as they were always different. Both as people, and their styles. Craig was a bit letdown at times by too artsy of directors and dull writing. But he was still a great Bond.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-63143081

    I’m still a bit torn about these two coming back.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited October 2022 Posts: 16,383
    I’m wondering where the news that they are coming back has come from, because they don’t seem to be aware of it in that interview!
  • MakeshiftPythonMakeshiftPython “Baja?!”
    Posts: 8,183
    I thought Brosnan was terrible in TWINE but that’s all on the director because everyone was pretty bad in that film.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,383
    As I found last night, it’s certainly a contrast going from TWINE to CR.
Sign In or Register to comment.