› ›

Do you Think they will bring back Dame Judi Dench

24

Comments

  • fire_and_icefire_and_ice
    Posts: 6,432
    Its feasible, she played M in the Brosnan era. I see the Brosnan M as a completely different character. Personally i don't like Dench as M, and think Fienes will be excellent as the new M. Though hypothetically if the next Bond movie was another mini reboot with a new bond. Dench could easily be M, a completely different M.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Dench's M in the Brosnan era is indeed a different M she played in the Craig era. However, Dench is done with Bond and will not be coming back to the series.
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    I just think use the picture thing just because everyone know she died in Skyfall soo it would be good to have one. Or they could show James going to her grave.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,179
    THEBond007 wrote:
    I just think use the picture thing just because everyone know she died in Skyfall soo it would be good to have one. Or they could show James going to her grave.

    In what way would a Bond film benefit from that?

    Obviously Judy Dench's Bond career is over. They didn't go to such dramatic lengths in SF only to see her mysteriously pop up again in the nearby future.

    Sincerely, no.

  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    Well im not saying that. I'm just saying he goes to the grave for like a minute or 2 just to see.

    Sincerely, Yes.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited February 2013 Posts: 24,179
    Again though, how could a Bond film possibly benefit from that? Why waste 2 minutes with Bond visiting M's grave? What's the point? Her story is finished! It's not like she and Bond were lovers or even married. They didn't show Bond visiting Quarrel's grave, or Della's grave, or many of the dead Bond girls' grave (besides Tracy) or even Vesper's grave! So, again, what's the point of visiting a dead M's grave?

    Why are you so into returning to Dench's M, @THEBond007? She was a good element of the Bond chapter 1995 - 2012, but even the Llewelyn Q was never referred to again but through a single line in DAD.
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    Ok well they didn't do it to the other M's but why not change it. The changed the whole formual for Skyfall. It' time for a little change look where it got Skyfall.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Given how quick he got over her death, I doubt he'll be hitting the cemetery anytime soon.
  • LudovicoLudovico
    Posts: 15,117
    DarthDimi wrote:
    Again though, how could a Bond film possibly benefit from that? Why waste 2 minutes with Bond visiting M's grave? What's the point? Her story is finished! It's not like she and Bond were lovers or even married. They didn't show Bond visiting Quarrel's grave, or Della's grave, or many of the dead Bond girls' grave (besides Tracy) or even Vesper's grave! So, again, what's the point of visiting a dead M's grave?

    Why are you so into returning to Dench's M, @THEBond007? She was a good element of the Bond chapter 1995 - 2012, but even the Llewelyn Q was never referred to again but through a single line in DAD.

    Now visiting Vesper's grave... THAT would be a great idea!
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    edited February 2013 Posts: 91
    See guess @DarthDemi doesn't know anything. and Btw []

    Mod edit: offensive language removed.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,179
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Ok well they didn't do it to the other M's but why not change it. The changed the whole formual for Skyfall. It' time for a little change look where it got Skyfall.

    I agree they might always change something but still you avoid my main question. Why, as in to what point would you have the camera focus to Judy Dench's passed away M?

    THEBond007 wrote:
    See guess @DarthDemi doesn't know anything. and Btw []

    Right. *sigh*
    Good thing I'm in the right mood today. :-)
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    Well because M was the real Bond Girl
  • myworldisenoughmyworldisenough
    Posts: 1,143
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Well because M was the real Bond Girl

    Come on, M is not a Bond girl, she was Bond's boss. Bond gets over people's deaths, it all part of keeping him sane and being able to function. He has not time for sentiment. He learned the hard way over Vesper.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,179
    myworldisenough wrote:
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Well because M was the real Bond Girl

    Come on, M is not a Bond girl, she was Bond's boss. Bond gets over people's deaths, it all part of keeping him sane and being able to function. He has not time for sentiment. He learned the hard way over Vesper.

    Indeed, as we find demonstrated here:

    M: "I assume you have no regrets."
    Bond: "I don't. What about you?"
    M: "Of course not, it would be unprofessional."

  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    No you guys don't understand you are thinking to realistically you have to just think about this M was like the mom of the mi6
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    No offense, mate but I think it's you who's not really thinking things through.
  • thelivingroyalethelivingroyale
    edited February 2013 Posts: 12,837
    We've finally got rid of her and you want her back?! :P

    Anyway I disliked her character towards the end anyway (I wouldn't have minded if she'd stopped after the Brosnan flicks), although I did like her a bit more in SF than in the other Craig films.

    And even if I did want her to return she couldn't because, well, she's dead.
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    All i want it in the next Bond movie put a picture in M's office then take it down after and never use it again.
  • X3MSonicXX3MSonicX https://www.behance.net/gallery/86760163/Fa-Posteres-de-007-No-Time-To-Die
    Posts: 2,635
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    We've finally got rid of her and you want her back?! :P

    You say that like it's a bad thing :P
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    We've finally got rid of her and you want her back?! :P

    You say that like it's a bad thing :P

    Hahaha :)) Something you wana say
  • SaintMarkSaintMark
    edited February 2013 Posts: 7,653
    X3MSonicX wrote:
    thelivingroyale wrote:
    We've finally got rid of her and you want her back?! :P

    You say that like it's a bad thing :P

    She could turn out to be the Head of Quantom all along which would give DC's 007 another chance to be come deeply depressive and thereby he can show his acting skills once again. ;)

    In all honesty, she had her ride and delivered splendily now it is time for other folks to get assaulted by the opinions of fanboys. :D

  • connerybondconnerybond
    Posts: 163

    NO!
  • EllisEllis
    Posts: 224
    Well, since they brought back Maud Adams as a different character, I guess they could do so with Ms Dench. But only in a cameo, with her not saying anything, kind of like Maud Adams 3rd Bond movie, AVTAK. Maybe they could have Daniel Craig searching rooms in a hotel for a villain, only to barge in during a private moment between Dame Judith and Sir Roger, with the later raising an eyebrow for the interruption.
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited February 2013 Posts: 11,139
    Ellis wrote:
    Well, since they brought back Maud Adams as a different character, I guess they could do so with Ms Dench. But only in a cameo, with her not saying anything, kind of like Maud Adams 3rd Bond movie, AVTAK. Maybe they could have Daniel Craig searching rooms in a hotel for a villain, only to barge in during a private moment between Dame Judith and Sir Roger, with the later raising an eyebrow for the interruption.

    clint_ew.gif
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    Agent007391 wrote:
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.

    That would be pretty cool having a flash back but Bond did get over her pretty quick. SO it would have to be something more then just that.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Agent007391 wrote:
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.

    That would be pretty cool having a flash back but Bond did get over her pretty quick. SO it would have to be something more then just that.

    Bond got over her quick? Where do you get that idea?
  • ultraboxultrabox
    Posts: 194
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Agent007391 wrote:
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.

    That would be pretty cool having a flash back but Bond did get over her pretty quick. SO it would have to be something more then just that.

    Flash backs are seldom cool. Unless your talking about nonlinear narrative, but then it's not really a flash back, it's narrative.
  • THEBond007THEBond007 Banned
    Posts: 91
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Agent007391 wrote:
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.

    That would be pretty cool having a flash back but Bond did get over her pretty quick. SO it would have to be something more then just that.

    Bond got over her quick? Where do you get that idea?

    Well you don't see him leaving MI6 or crying in Mallories office do you no.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,968
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote:
    THEBond007 wrote:
    Agent007391 wrote:
    I doubt Judi Dench will come back as anything other than a (possible) flashback. That's about it.

    That would be pretty cool having a flash back but Bond did get over her pretty quick. SO it would have to be something more then just that.

    Bond got over her quick? Where do you get that idea?

    I guess he is speaking of Bond holding M as she dies, and then immediately cutting to Bond on the roof, where it is shown that he didn't attend her will reading.

    Bond did his crying when she passed, @THEBond007. I'm not sure why he would end his role as an MI-6 agent or cry on Mallory's shoulder later on. That makes no sense whatsoever.
This discussion has been closed.