Last Movie you Watched?

1325326328330331983

Comments

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,968
    The Jungle Book (2016).

    Now I know why even @Creasy47 loved the film. The CGI is absolutely mindblowing. I kept asking to myself if some of it was filmed 'for real' as some of the shots were too good to be done with computers. My oh my did special effects go a long way in the past few years. This will definately be in my top 10 at the end of the year. Simply spectacular!

    My next trip in the cinema will be this wednesday to see Kevin Costner be a proper badass in 'Criminal'.

    I still can't get over how lifelike the CGI was. I'd love to go and see it again.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Birdleson wrote: »
    FoxRox wrote: »
    The Remains of the Day (1993). Nice film.

    One of my favorite films of the '90s. I used to watch it often.

    It's my favourite drama movie together with Howard's End and Fried Green Tomatoes and Steel Magnolias and Driving Miss Daisy.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    The Bourne Identity
    The Bourne Supremacy
    The Bourne Ultimatum

    Having caught the trailer for this summer's Jason Bourne, thought I'd give these superlative action thrillers another viewing. Love 'em all. Hope the new one keeps up the high standard of the original trilogy.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    edited May 2016 Posts: 7,113
    THE JIGSAW MAN

    Convoluted plot but stellar performances by Michael Caine and Laurence Olivier. Lovely Cold War espionage atmosphere, director of photography no-one less than Freddie Francis. Fine synth soundtrack too.

    3 out of 5.

    Furthermore lots of familiar names and faces. A joy to see Charles Gray shine in a fairly large role, love the man's voice. Than there is a scene with the wonderful Vladek Sheybal, cast once again as a Slavic character. Peter Burton, Anthony Dawson and Yuri Borienko have small parts too. Directed by Terence Young, edited by Peter Hunt.

    Anyone seen this as well? I'd love to know what you thought of it.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,715
    Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation (2015)

    One of my favorite action films of recent years. I've seen this movie atleast 10 times now. The pacing is just incredible, I hardly have time to breath between the Opera sequence and to the Moroccan section, and before I know it, the climax in London starts. Cruise is as badass as it gets in this film, and his co-stars (Pegg and Fergusson) are also fantastic. Killer soundtrack, breathtaking action sequences.. What more can I ask for in the action movie genre? I really can't wait for the sequel.
  • Posts: 4,813
    Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation (2015)
    It may sound like blasphemy, but I actually liked M:I5 more than Spectre! In fact, the last three Mission: Impossible movies would have made GREAT Bond adventures!

    They had the ideal mix of action and FUN.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation (2015)
    It may sound like blasphemy, but I actually liked M:I5 more than Spectre! In fact, the last three Mission: Impossible movies would have made GREAT Bond adventures!

    They had the ideal mix of action and FUN.
    Then count me in as a blasphemer too. Great fun, agreed.

    I realized while I was watching TSWLM a few days back (one of my faves) that the last two MI films in particular have more in common with that classic than the last two Bond films. They just get on with it, and everyone goes about their business with purpose, attitude & infinite cool. They also all have absolutely superb stuntwork and tension filled sequencing and pacing.
  • JohnHammond73JohnHammond73 Lancashire, UK
    Posts: 4,151
    Mission: Impossible 2. I do like these and thought I'd have a research of all before watching Rogue Nation for the first time.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited May 2016 Posts: 15,715
    @bondjames the last 2 'Bourne' films (Supremacy and Ultimatum) are also like that, IMO. Albeit way more serious, they still have the no-nonsense storytelling. No time wasted between each action scene. TSWLM, the last 2 MI films and Supremacy/Ultimatum are just pure, flat-out action films. I do very much enjoy SF and SP, but I miss the flat-out style of past outing like TSWLM, GE, TND, QOS.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I agree @DaltonCraig007.

    You're right, QoS is probably the last time they did one like that, but it was messed up for some by the 'frenzy' editing and writer's strike.

    I hope they go for that style with the next one. 'Up' the pace a little and just move it along. Of course, they need a coherent script in order for it to all come together properly and I'd prefer a younger actor in the role, because that would be a great 'intro' for him and a new, more youthful beginning for the franchise.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,715
    2008 was a pretty good year for this style of action film, @bondjames. QOS, Rambo 4, Taken were basically 90 minutes of non-stop piling up the body count by the main character.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited May 2016 Posts: 8,395
    Personally I prefer Bond films to be based more in the thriller genre than action. I see what you're saying about pace though. None of the first 3 Connery films are even 2 hours long. I think that really helps.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2016 Posts: 23,883
    @DaltonCraig007, I'm keen to see what Bourne does this year. MI5 really set a high bar with 'pacing' last year, and that's something Bourne always does well, so I'm looking forward to them blowing me away again.

    Having said that, I'm not necessarily interested in all out action fests and a high kill rate. More just good editing and pacing with 'out of this world' stunts & suspense. That's what Bourne & increasingly Hunt deliver well.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    Posts: 15,715
    @bondjames I really want to know what the runtime will be for the new 'Bourne' film. None of the films in the original trilogy were longer than 1 hour and 45 minutes (excluding the end credits).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    bondjames wrote: »
    @DaltonCraig007, I'm keen to see what Bourne does this year. MI5 really set a high bar with 'pacing' last year, and that's something Bourne always does well, so I'm looking forward to them blowing me away again.

    Having said that, I'm not necessarily interested in all out action fests and a high kill rate. More just good editing and pacing with 'out of this world' stunts & suspense. That's what Bourne & increasingly Hunt deliver well.

    Yeah, suspense and intrigue are Bonds bread and butter. With action/stunt work serving as a nice topper and to be used judiciously.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    @bondjames I really want to know what the runtime will be for the new 'Bourne' film. None of the films in the original trilogy were longer than 1 hour and 45 minutes (excluding the end credits).

    That's some economic storytelling right there.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I have a feeling it's going to be longer @DaltonCraig007. Probably at least 2hrs. That's been the trend lately, and they have to reestablish Bourne for us with this film as well since it's been a long while. Hopefully not much longer than 2 hrs though. That would be just right.
  • edited May 2016 Posts: 2,341
    The Huntsman: Winter War
    I thought Emily Blunt was great and I always enjoy watching Jessica Chastain. As a movie it was entertaining. Not the best and not the worst thing out there. That is yet to come:

    I was subjected to 5 trailers and that is what I found to be interesting:
    Of the five. there were 3 remakes and 1 sequel. this is a pet peeve of mine:WTF is the originality in Hollywood these days??

    The Sequel : Independence Day: It has been 20 years since the original thrilled us with super alien tech, super cool Will Smith. Now watching the trailer (Will Smith is absent from this one) I just kept thinking "Been there, done that".

    The Remakes: (hold on to your butts)
    The Magnificient Seven I am actually am excited about this one. I grew up loving westerns and this one has Denzil Washington in it. And any film Denzil does is worth a look see.

    Ben Hur are you kidding me? A timeless classic from 1956 is being updated and redone? How can they? Instead of real chariots, horses and stunt men in the chariot race we will be treated to the latest CGI...gotta love this crap. Yeah, right.
    Perhaps animal rights activists will not stand by and allow such stunts to be filmed today.

    This is the one that really got me going: The Legend of Tarzan. WTF ? Not counting that trashy film in 1981 with Bo Derek we have not seen the ape man in like 60 years! Maybe the themes were deemed too politically incorrect but here we go. TARZAN. And instead of men in ape suits and trained chimps we get treated to a bunch of CGI simians.

    BTW I end this on the one positive trailer I saw: The Girl On the Train starring the aforementioned Emily Blunt. Looks like an intriguing psychological thriller. It won't be out until Oct, so we have to suffer thru the rest of the summer and early fall....
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    To be fair, the 1956 Ben Hur wasn t an original work, either.
  • Posts: 5,993
    OHMSS69 wrote: »

    This is the one that really got me going: The Legend of Tarzan. WTF ? Not counting that trashy film in 1981 with Bo Derek we have not seen the ape man in like 60 years! Maybe the themes were deemed too politically incorrect but here we go. TARZAN. And instead of men in ape suits and trained chimps we get treated to a bunch of CGI simians. ..

    There have been quite a few movies about Tarzan in the last sixty years :

    18836214.jpg

    tarzan-et-la-cite-perdue-film-6501.jpg

    maxresdefault.jpg

    074567.jpg

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Greystoke was a great and different Tarzan movie.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    And George of the Jungle.
  • Posts: 12,466
    Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010). I remember feeling lukewarm about it back in 2010, but I liked it a lot this last watch. Definitely one of the best animated Batman features. DiMaggio's Joker was superb.
  • Posts: 4,813
    Gerard wrote: »

    18836214.jpg
    Damn that Christipher Lambert had such a promising career, between Greystoke and Highlander (well, the first one that is). What the hell happened to him? In the 90's he practically faded from existence. Maybe Expendables 4 could help get his face out there again. He's not that old after all. Time for a comeback!!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Lambert was even considered for Bond after Roger Moore, but his French accent got in the way.
  • Posts: 6,432
    Don't forget Fortress ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Don't forget Fortress ;)
    Damn, that was a bad film!
  • Posts: 6,432
    Don't forget Fortress ;)
    Damn, that was a bad film!

    Been years since I watched it, definitely bargain bin.

  • Posts: 4,813
    And DTV- something Lambert seemed to settle for all too often, no doubt leading to his current disappearance. As The Kurgan would say, "It's better to burn out... than to FADE AWAY! HEEE YA!"

    Apparently he was in this years "Hail, Caesar!" but I haven't seen it yet. He may have made a decent Bond now that you mention it, @Thunderfinger, but if it was right after Moore, he would have been the youngest Bond since Lazenby. He would have been a different choice to say the least.

    christopher-lambert-for-james-bond.jpg

    I fear however that that trademark intense gaze of his may have come across as creepy rather than sexy to some women. Plus we wouldn't have had Dalton, so SEE YA
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    They could always dub him, of course. Great actor.
Sign In or Register to comment.