Last Movie you Watched?

13839414344984

Comments

  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    @MajorDSmythe, is the 1978 version of The Big Sleep as convoluted as the 1946 version with Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall? I am unsure if you have seen that one, but was curious because I have heard that the 1978 film is truer to the novel's seedier parts than the conservative '46 version.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited June 2012 Posts: 13,978
    I'm sorry, but I can't say as i've not seen the Bogie/Bacall film, nor have I read Chandler's book. But there are aspects of the Mitch version, that I can imagine wouldn't be in the 1946 film, or if they were, they'd be heavily watered down.

    I've seen so many people put the film down, but as a Mitch fan, I really like it.
  • St_GeorgeSt_George Shuttling Drax's lovelies to the space doughnut - happy 40th, MR!
    Posts: 1,699
    Smythey, you really need to see the 1946 version, you really do. It's a masterpiece... :-O
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    the_dark_knight_poster.jpg
    What more can I say about this masterpiece that I haven't already mentioned? I have seen this film countless times, and yet every single time I find some new meaning in it, and invest more of myself in hoping the good guys win. And that isn't easy in this film, because Heath was so spot on brilliant that it is hard not to root for him. The Batman and Joker coexistent relationship is presented beautifully, and better than I have seen anywhere else. Joker puts it best when he says
    "Oh, you. You just couldn't let me go, could you? This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object. You truly are incorruptible, aren't you? You won't kill me out of some misplaced sense of self-righteousness. And I won't kill you because you're just too much fun. I think you and I are destined to do this forever."
    I tag that because it is a moment everyone needs to see fresh, and in the moment. This film is so incredible to me that I refuse to find anything wrong with it. Everything from the characterization and escalating action pieces are immaculate, as is the shots of the city and the class A dialogue and character interaction, especially in moments with Batman and Joker. The wonderful thing about this film is that it is a Batman film, yet Joker steals the show. And how couldn't he? Heath is the greatest physical performer on screen of Joker, and that will ever be. Every mannerism, every word that ghoulishly exits his mouth is taken in with excitement and a grin at the sheer talent in which he brings us every delivery. The man has no morals, no motives, and that is the perplexing part. He is just like us, a human being, and yet he can be that evil in a world of good men like Batman and Gordon. As we see with
    Harvey, those good men can be turned to men like Joker an instant
    , and the film makes you inspect your own morals, and whether or not
    you would kill the prisoners on the ferry, or throw away the detonator and hope the other ferry also chooses not to use the detonator.
    Short story short, this film is one of the greatest I have ever seen. It is all sides of the coin. It is an amazing, deep drama, and shows that a "superhero" film can be emotional, complex and intelligent. It is a film where you must be a Batman fan to truly appreciate, and I can never thank everyone involved in its making enough for what they have given to both me and cinema.

    100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000/10
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, excellent review, but one complaint: you missed about fifteen zeroes in your score.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, excellent review, but one complaint: you missed about fifteen zeroes in your score.

    I know, but I had to go and help do some stuff around the yard, so I had to cut it short. ;)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Haha, shame. ;)
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Wow. I just saw most of The Mist. What a messed up film.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Wow. I just saw most of The Mist. What a messed up film.

    Did you see the ending? Insane.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow. I just saw most of The Mist. What a messed up film.

    Did you see the ending? Insane.
    YEAH. Talk about
    extreme bad luck. I feel so bad for that guy.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7,
    the worst luck I've ever seen. After that, I wouldn't even want to live, knowing I survived after doing such a monstrosity.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7,
    the worst luck I've ever seen. After that, I wouldn't even want to live, knowing I survived after doing such a monstrosity.

    I think
    the man killed himself the first chance he got.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, I wouldn't be shocked if that happened.
  • 001001
    Posts: 1,575
    Gone baby gone.
    THe affleck brothers do well with this film.8/10
  • Posts: 7,653
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow. I just saw most of The Mist. What a messed up film.

    Did you see the ending? Insane.

    Easily the best part of the movie, it changed the movie from a monstermovie to something more edgy and something to remember. Like Carrie's final moments which scared the bejesus out of cinema audiences.

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited June 2012 Posts: 40,976
    @SaintMark, it was a huge middle finger to traditional Hollywood film endings, and I loved it.

    Yesterday in the evening, I caught 'The Cabin In The Woods':

    What a film. Sets it up to be the cliche horror film, complete with the setting, characters, villain, etc...and then totally flips it on its head and gives us an insanely crazy ending that nobody can expect.
    What I love about the film is that it is a full 90 minute nod to horror audiences today, from the painting to the ending. With the painting, as soon as Holden moves it, he is the audience and Dana is the film: he has control over her, and can watch as much as he wants with her being totally unknowing about his eyes. He can watch her to his heart's content, and she will never have an idea. Audience to a film.

    With the ending - since some people, for some reason, don't understand it - it's a bigger version of the Hollywood audience (WE THE PEOPLE) today: you give us the traditional horror film, the jock, the stoner, etc., and you don't abide by the rules and how it should end, then the world ends in our eyes, and we go on a rampage via word-of-mouth and message boards because we don't like it. We are the Gods presented in the movie.

    It's almost as if the film is a culmination of all horror films: the monsters in the masks were hinted at those being the ones from 'The Strangers,' the guy with the cube and the saws in his face was a nod to Pinhead from 'Hellraiser,' etc. It's as if all the horror monster icons of all time were accumulated to create a sacrifice of the Gods, and all of the cast's 'possible options' is what we always see in a horror film that attracts the monster. After all this, it was a great movie, great ending, I loved it. Didn't disappoint.

    I also watched John Carpenter's 'The Ward' last night:

    Not much to say about the movie. Had some cheap scares, good cast (an underrated Jared Harris), but an extremely cop-out, predictable ending that
    tires my eyes more and more for every film I see it in. It was unique the first time I saw it, but twenty five or fifty times later, I don't care for it.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Jared Harris is awesome. A perfect Moriarty. >:)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Jared Harris is awesome. A perfect Moriarty. >:)

    That's it! When I saw him in 'The Ward' last night, I couldn't figure out the two films that (usually) come to mind when I think of him: it was 'Resident Evil: Apocalypse' and something else. I can't believe the role of Moriarty himself wasn't obvious to me.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Jared Harris is awesome. A perfect Moriarty. >:)

    That's it! When I saw him in 'The Ward' last night, I couldn't figure out the two films that (usually) come to mind when I think of him: it was 'Resident Evil: Apocalypse' and something else. I can't believe the role of Moriarty himself wasn't obvious to me.
    I was so happy to see him thrive in it. In any Sherlock film featuring an adaption of The Final Problem, the actor and his performance in the role of Moriarty is a make-or-break deal, but Harris was brilliant, and he and Robert bounced off each other so well. It made me proud, and my expectations weren't easy to surmount.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, yeah, I loved the back and forth banter between Robert and James.

    Speaking of Robert, since I'm sure you're a far greater and more knowing fan of Sherlock Holmes than I am, how do you feel about Robert playing Holmes?
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7, yeah, I loved the back and forth banter between Robert and James.

    Speaking of Robert, since I'm sure you're a far greater and more knowing fan of Sherlock Holmes than I am, how do you feel about Robert playing Holmes?

    Like I have said, his version isn't as much like the original Doyle Sherlock as I would like, but is still entertaining, and moments like him deducing as well as his quick rhetoric is great. Everything from the neurotic over anxious Sherlock with a rain forest in his apartment are a little over the top for what Sherlock would commonly do, but the odd little experiments that he does in the films are great to see and something I can see him doing. The film adds great fighting sequences, though Sherlock is not an action hero by any means. He knows bartitsu (Japanese wrestling) in the Doyle stories, and is quite affective in combat, so he is quite capable of such feats and I tend to let it slide. There is a great chemistry with Robert and Jude, and the Sherlock/Watson on screen partnership is equally make-or-break, which they pull off spectacularly. I do however hate that they made Sherlock and Irene an "item". In the stories there is a certain respect Sherlock has for it, but it is much deeper than admiration, and one does wonder how he truly feels about her. She stays in his mind forever as "The woman" because she defeated him as others haven't, and for that she is forever a special person in his world, no matter how brief she appears. This is captured brilliantly in A Scandal in Belgravia, the opener for the second series of BBC's Sherlock. They are more tantalizing apart, and simply seeing in Sherlock that something is different in how he feels about her that makes him such an interesting character. Behind that stubborn facade and the unaffected demeanor, he truly cares for Irene, and further more for Watson, who equally cares for him. They are the best duo in fiction, needless to say. All in all, I thoroughly enjoy them, and having watched both this week, they are still as enjoyable as the last time I saw them. They have a great Sherlock sound, and you really feel the atmosphere of Victorian London. Kudos to Guy Ritchie for keeping with a Sherlock formula, but mixing it up and adding new ingredients without completely losing the identities of the characters.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    I just might have to watch both 'Sherlock Holmes' and the sequel tonight, should be entertaining because I haven't seen the sequel since it was out in theaters, nor the first one since the beginning of this year.

    I caught an episode of Cumberbatch's version of 'Sherlock' (sorry for the ignorance, but this is the BBC one you speak of, correct, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7?), and it was quite enjoyable. Martin Freeman is a great actor, and I loved him in the underrated 'Wild Target.'
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    I just might have to watch both 'Sherlock Holmes' and the sequel tonight, should be entertaining because I haven't seen the sequel since it was out in theaters, nor the first one since the beginning of this year.

    I caught an episode of Cumberbatch's version of 'Sherlock' (sorry for the ignorance, but this is the BBC one you speak of, correct, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7?), and it was quite enjoyable. Martin Freeman is a great actor, and I loved him in the underrated 'Wild Target.'

    I adore Benedict and the BBC Sherlock. Even since a friend introduced me to it I fell in love with it. The adaptions are superb, and it truly is a show made by fans, for fans, and I couldn't ask for more. I love the little Holmes references thrown in there that only fans will catch, and while we are smirking everyone is clueless as to what happened. Benedict and Martin have the best Sherlock/Watson chemistry I have seen on screen, especially in the emotional third episode and series finale of series 2. Benedict is spot on, and is a serious rival against the equally mesmerizing Jeremy Brett in the battle of the best Sherlock. The Sherlock in this adaption is every bit the Sherlock from the Doyle tales, but is also more human than we have seen in a while, and that is great to see. The opener with Irene remains my favorite, as it is just so well done, and examines Sherlock and how he feels for her so well. I am going to rewatch the first series soon. I can't be away from them for too long. :)
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Creasy47 wrote:
    I just might have to watch both 'Sherlock Holmes' and the sequel tonight, should be entertaining because I haven't seen the sequel since it was out in theaters, nor the first one since the beginning of this year.

    I caught an episode of Cumberbatch's version of 'Sherlock' (sorry for the ignorance, but this is the BBC one you speak of, correct, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7?), and it was quite enjoyable. Martin Freeman is a great actor, and I loved him in the underrated 'Wild Target.'

    I adore Benedict and the BBC Sherlock. Even since a friend introduced me to it I fell in love with it. The adaptions are superb, and it truly is a show made by fans, for fans, and I couldn't ask for more. I love the little Holmes references thrown in there that only fans will catch, and while we are smirking everyone is clueless as to what happened. Benedict and Martin have the best Sherlock/Watson chemistry I have seen on screen, especially in the emotional third episode and series finale of series 2. Benedict is spot on, and is a serious rival against the equally mesmerizing Jeremy Brett in the battle of the best Sherlock. The Sherlock in this adaption is every bit the Sherlock from the Doyle tales, but is also more human than we have seen in a while, and that is great to see. The opener with Irene remains my favorite, as it is just so well done, and examines Sherlock and how he feels for her so well. I am going to rewatch the first series soon. I can't be away from them for too long. :)

    Wow. I just might have to watch the rest of it soon, then - perhaps both films tonight, followed by a few episodes of the show? Sounds like a good idea, if I can find the time to do so. Is it true that there are only seven episodes?
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Creasy47 wrote:
    I just might have to watch both 'Sherlock Holmes' and the sequel tonight, should be entertaining because I haven't seen the sequel since it was out in theaters, nor the first one since the beginning of this year.

    I caught an episode of Cumberbatch's version of 'Sherlock' (sorry for the ignorance, but this is the BBC one you speak of, correct, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7?), and it was quite enjoyable. Martin Freeman is a great actor, and I loved him in the underrated 'Wild Target.'

    I adore Benedict and the BBC Sherlock. Even since a friend introduced me to it I fell in love with it. The adaptions are superb, and it truly is a show made by fans, for fans, and I couldn't ask for more. I love the little Holmes references thrown in there that only fans will catch, and while we are smirking everyone is clueless as to what happened. Benedict and Martin have the best Sherlock/Watson chemistry I have seen on screen, especially in the emotional third episode and series finale of series 2. Benedict is spot on, and is a serious rival against the equally mesmerizing Jeremy Brett in the battle of the best Sherlock. The Sherlock in this adaption is every bit the Sherlock from the Doyle tales, but is also more human than we have seen in a while, and that is great to see. The opener with Irene remains my favorite, as it is just so well done, and examines Sherlock and how he feels for her so well. I am going to rewatch the first series soon. I can't be away from them for too long. :)

    Wow. I just might have to watch the rest of it soon, then - perhaps both films tonight, followed by a few episodes of the show? Sounds like a good idea, if I can find the time to do so. Is it true that there are only seven episodes?
    So far there have been two series, each with 3 episodes each, since 2010. It seems small, but each is an hour and a half, and considering the quality of the episodes you really get a brilliant Sherlock fix.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    edited June 2012 Posts: 13,355
    Six episodes. Two series of three, so far. Though each is 90 minutes.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Wow. Nine hours in just six episodes, that's amazing. I really need to watch this soon. My girlfriend, of all people, has decided to watch 'The Human Centipede: Full Sequence,' so I'm stuck with this for now. Really gives the stomach a nice feeling as the film unravels.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow. Nine hours in just six episodes, that's amazing. I really need to watch this soon. My girlfriend, of all people, has decided to watch 'The Human Centipede: Full Sequence,' so I'm stuck with this for now. Really gives the stomach a nice feeling as the film unravels.

    Just keep quiet, smile, and tell her she is pretty. It'll be over soon. I kind of sound like Liam Neeson in Taken now, haha.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow. Nine hours in just six episodes, that's amazing. I really need to watch this soon. My girlfriend, of all people, has decided to watch 'The Human Centipede: Full Sequence,' so I'm stuck with this for now. Really gives the stomach a nice feeling as the film unravels.

    Just keep quiet, smile, and tell her she is pretty. It'll be over soon. I kind of sound like Liam Neeson in Taken now, haha.

    She's about to be taken...away from the remote, so I can select something proper to watch. I've already seen this film, and don't care to view it again.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    edited June 2012 Posts: 28,694
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Creasy47 wrote:
    Wow. Nine hours in just six episodes, that's amazing. I really need to watch this soon. My girlfriend, of all people, has decided to watch 'The Human Centipede: Full Sequence,' so I'm stuck with this for now. Really gives the stomach a nice feeling as the film unravels.

    Just keep quiet, smile, and tell her she is pretty. It'll be over soon. I kind of sound like Liam Neeson in Taken now, haha.

    She's about to be taken...away from the remote, so I can select something proper to watch. I've already seen this film, and don't care to view it again.

    :)) OH THE TEARS! :))
Sign In or Register to comment.