Last Movie you Watched?

1450451453455456983

Comments

  • Posts: 7,653
    Was just watching "Jaws" and as soon as Shaw arrives I always seem to hear "old boy" he is just bloody awesome in Jaws and 'The deep".
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    I prefer the alternate ending to Jaws where Quint kills the shark with a garrote wire fashioned from fishing line.
  • Posts: 7,653
    I prefer the alternate ending to Jaws where Quint kills the shark with a garrote wire fashioned from fishing line.

    That would be incredibly nice to get Spielberg to add that as an extra on the next Jaws BD release.

  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,173
    I went to see RO for a final (i.e. 5th) time in theatres, this time taking my mom. She loved the film and I still love the film. In fact, it gets better with every viewing. I can pay more attention on certain things that I commonly glance over the first time. The dog fights and Vader moments just keep rocking. No matter how often I've seen them at this point, they keep going strong! I've also come to like the music better and better and that helps a great deal too. I was initially a bit let down by the slow build-up of the first half of the film but even that little aggravation has vanished as I've come to genuinely love the characters and their moments and most importantly how the Rogue unit comes together. Chirrut, Baze and Bodhi are my favourite human characters, with K-2SO an additional stroke of genius. Tarkin doesn't bother me in the least! It's not perfect what they did with him but hey, if that's a problem for you, I have no idea how you have survived the prequels, if at all. ;-)

    My only two mild complaints are
    - Forest Withaker, who I think plays his part a bit over-dramatic sometimes. The way he yells, "LIES!", it's as if he's auditioning for some Mel Gibson movie.
    - the many victory speeches given before we enter a battle. We get no less than three of those in under 10 or so minutes: at the council meeting on Yavin 4, in the hanger still on Yavin 4, in the imperial shuttle right after take-off from Yavin 4. :) I guess by then we've really understood the message.

    But these complaints are minor and few. Even now, having sat through RO 5 times in 3 or so weeks, I can't wait to re-visit the film on DVD. I'm sorry if I'm "delusional", my love for RO is genuine and earnest. In fact, screw that, I'm not going to apologise. I love this film!

    SUPERB
    1) SW + TESB
    2) RO + SW Rebels

    GREAT
    3) ROTJ
    4) TFA

    GOOD
    5) ROTS + SW Clone Wars (2003 TV series)
    6) AOTC + SW The Clone Wars (the series)

    I'M IN APOLOGIST MODE NOW
    7) TPM
    8) SW The Clone Wars (the film)

    EH... NOT GOOD!
    9) Ewoks 1 & 2
    10) Holiday Special
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    WOW @DarthDimi

    So glad I'm not the only one that excited about RO, already felt like a leper around here.

    Also happy to see you seem to love Rebels as much as I do. Indeed I rank it as highly as RO and SW77.

    I wish I could have seen it 5 times...I barely made it to the cinema once last week. But thankfully I did go. I plan to go again, if I can catch it.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,173
    @Birdleson, that is indeed another debate, and one I wouldn't shy away from. My first encounter with this trick was Sky Captain And The World Of Tomorrow. I thought it rather strange but at the same time strangely amusing too. Then I learned about Sir Oliver Reed in Gladiator. I hadn't even noticed. Then Paul Walker. Now this.

    Indeed, how to take this? They might have done some recasting. I would have accepted that. But do I have ethical issues with it? Hm... please explain. I'm not seeing any at the moment. In a way, one could take this as an homage to Cushing. Of course if people start making films with nothing but "reanimated" actors and actresses, that might be a stretch too far. Could you tell me more, @Birdleson?
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited January 2017 Posts: 24,173
    Fair enough. We'll leave it at that then.
    For the record, I'm not saying I'm a "fan" of this practice. It just hasn't bothered me so far... But always one to respect your opinion, @Birdleson, I was genuinely interested to learn.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    It's an interesting question. Just because the technology exists, should it be used? A bit like the cloning question, but less extreme. For now it just looks poor (at least to me), but soon enough I'm sure they'll refine it so that it becomes very lifelike. That's when the artist's 'estates' will contemplate the gravy train.
  • Posts: 2,107
    Joe
    Mars Attacks
    The Godfather part III
    The Quick and the Dead
  • Posts: 12,466
    Put on Lawrence of Arabia (1962) - second watch. Definitely one of the best films ever.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    @bondjames, I guess the feel of the quality of the film even when enhanced and remastered on bluray has always been intentional. Hitchcock wanted the film to look like a velvet cloth covered on every single frame of it, who apparently took example from the early 30s era German film directors.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    bondjames wrote: »
    Marnie (1964)

    I was in the mood for some Hitchcock, having really enjoyed two superb Cary Grant (To Catch A Thief & North By Northwest) entries on New Year's Eve. So I put in this Sean Connery/Tippi Hedren starring mystery about a compulsive thief with repressed memories and strange psychological character quirks. I've always had a love/hate relationship with this film. When I first watched it as a youngster I found it a tad disturbing. Tippi's titular character actually frightened me, as I felt she would either snap and kill someone in the film. As I've matured however, I've really grown to appreciate this film. I'm fascinated by behavioural tics, heuristics and cognitive biases, and respect Hitchcock for dealing with this sort of subject in one of his films. Connery is excellent as Mark Rutland, the victim of one of Marnie's thefts and her would-be saviour. His character is a bit of a bastard (even when in love), but puts himself at great risk to help her. Tippi Hedren really is excellent as the emotionally disturbed lead. She brings the necessary level of uncomfortable neuroticism to Marnie. Bernard Hermann delivers a superb score as always. It's also good to see Mariette Hartley & Bruce Dern in early roles. The only real negative for me is the blu ray quality. It's really quite poor and soft focused in many close up scenes, which is disappointing.

    'Soft focus' was done a lot during the 30s, 40s, 50s, nothing to do with your blu-ray it was done in camera using filters, hides any blemishes etc. I find the rear-projection in that film more of a concern, really takes you out of the film.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    bondjames wrote: »
    Marnie (1964)

    I was in the mood for some Hitchcock, having really enjoyed two superb Cary Grant (To Catch A Thief & North By Northwest) entries on New Year's Eve. So I put in this Sean Connery/Tippi Hedren starring mystery about a compulsive thief with repressed memories and strange psychological character quirks. I've always had a love/hate relationship with this film. When I first watched it as a youngster I found it a tad disturbing. Tippi's titular character actually frightened me, as I felt she would either snap and kill someone in the film. As I've matured however, I've really grown to appreciate this film. I'm fascinated by behavioural tics, heuristics and cognitive biases, and respect Hitchcock for dealing with this sort of subject in one of his films. Connery is excellent as Mark Rutland, the victim of one of Marnie's thefts and her would-be saviour. His character is a bit of a bastard (even when in love), but puts himself at great risk to help her. Tippi Hedren really is excellent as the emotionally disturbed lead. She brings the necessary level of uncomfortable neuroticism to Marnie. Bernard Hermann delivers a superb score as always. It's also good to see Mariette Hartley & Bruce Dern in early roles. The only real negative for me is the blu ray quality. It's really quite poor and soft focused in many close up scenes, which is disappointing.

    'Soft focus' was done a lot during the 30s, 40s, 50s, nothing to do with your blu-ray it was done in camera using filters, hides any blemishes etc.
    Exactly.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    edited January 2017 Posts: 13,978
    Batman vs Superman: Dawn Of Justice (Standard ver.)
    I had already stumbled across the one scene involving Jena Malone's character on youtube (I am now desperately clinging to the idea that Snyder had second thoughts about wasting her on this one scene, and will cast her in a more prominent role later on), and beside a mild interest in the Batman films, I don't care enough for Batman or Superman to see the extended cut.
    So anyway, I watched BvS, and... I liked Afflek as both Batman and Bruce Wayne. Keaton is still my favourite, but I did like this Batman too, and I didn't have a problem with him killing the villainous scum he encountered. What I took from the film, was that this Batman was a few years older than the previous actors, and was sick and tired of the cycle of catch criminal - send them to prison - they escape/get parole - they go right to their old ways, so baring the ones he brands, he takes an extreme prejudice against criminal activity. That warehouse fight reminded me so much of the Arkham games.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Love the review, Major.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    Love the review, Major.

    Thanks. I suppose that given how BvS was received, when Affleck makes his next appearance in the role, he won't be as aggressive.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    @bondjames, I guess the feel of the quality of the film even when enhanced and remastered on bluray has always been intentional. Hitchcock wanted the film to look like a velvet cloth covered on every single frame of it, who apparently took example from the early 30s era German film directors.
    I wasn't aware of that @ClarkDevlin. What you say makes sense, because I certainly got the impression that it was 'soft focus' gone rogue. Very surreal. So I can appreciate now that it was deliberate, and I suppose the blu ray format accentuated it. I noticed there was less of that as the film went on, and that may have been intentional as well.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    It still doesn't explain why the DVD has beautiful picture quality while the Blu ray looks awful.
    I believe it's a bad mastering job.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    I'm with @Birdleson on the CGI debate. In some cases I can see it being okay when the intentions are good and the production is paying tribute to the actor, as in Paul Walker's case, but there's a line that can be crossed that just feels like massive exploitation of an actor's name.

    As it has been said, there wasn't any big reason Cushing had to be in the film or he couldn't have been recasted, but they didn't go that way.

    I think it has to be taken on a case by case basis. For movies that lose actor's mid-production, I can see it working simply because the cost of recasting and reshooting would be ridiculous and the schedule shouldn't be halted. But in RO's case when the actor has been dead for decades and there's really no reason to make a CGI model of them at all, I start to wonder about just what purpose it serves or what good it does to the actor's image.

    It's a very weird, uncomfortable modern day issue to contend with, and it's one of those things where you think you should be really offended with it.
  • Posts: 16,154
    bondjames wrote: »
    Marnie (1964)

    I was in the mood for some Hitchcock, having really enjoyed two superb Cary Grant (To Catch A Thief & North By Northwest) entries on New Year's Eve. So I put in this Sean Connery/Tippi Hedren starring mystery about a compulsive thief with repressed memories and strange psychological character quirks. I've always had a love/hate relationship with this film. When I first watched it as a youngster I found it a tad disturbing. Tippi's titular character actually frightened me, as I felt she would either snap and kill someone in the film. As I've matured however, I've really grown to appreciate this film. I'm fascinated by behavioural tics, heuristics and cognitive biases, and respect Hitchcock for dealing with this sort of subject in one of his films. Connery is excellent as Mark Rutland, the victim of one of Marnie's thefts and her would-be saviour. His character is a bit of a bastard (even when in love), but puts himself at great risk to help her. Tippi Hedren really is excellent as the emotionally disturbed lead. She brings the necessary level of uncomfortable neuroticism to Marnie. Bernard Hermann delivers a superb score as always. It's also good to see Mariette Hartley & Bruce Dern in early roles. The only real negative for me is the blu ray quality. It's really quite poor and soft focused in many close up scenes, which is disappointing.

    Pretty interesting film. I've always liked it and Sean it great. I love when Sean says" Good for you. You've apologized nicely. You may go now."
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited January 2017 Posts: 15,715
    Nocturnal Animals (2016)

    What a fantastic film. Another one of those impressive career choices for Jake Gyllenhaal, who delivers a powerhouse performance in a new thriller film. I can not mention Amy Adams, who is as splendid as she was in 'Arrival', Aaron Johnson who is (surprisingly) phenomenal, and Michael Shannon who gives us a career-defining perfomance (yet again, one of the most underrated actors around). Stunning cinematography, a lot of very intense scenes, the film really flew by. Some of the sequences were just off the charts, especially those between Gyllenhaal and Shannon. One of my new favorites of 2016.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    I don t see the problem with cgi Tarkin at all. Would it be different if they just applied some make-up on an actor with a resemblance?
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    While I realised Cushing was CGI, it's very obvious, it did not bother me in the slightest because I simply had no time being bothered as RO was oozing awesomeness at every corner.
    Star Wars is fantasy with a history of puppets, muppets, animatronics, CGI creatures and costumed actors. So an obviously CGI animated human fits nicely into it.
    Now if they'd make a sequel of To Catch A Thief with a CGI Cary Grant and Grace Kelly then I would go berserk.
  • Posts: 4,615
    Strictly Ballroom (1992)

    Such a great film. Gently takes the mickey out of 2 cultures at the same time and has some great one liners but also never forgets the romance at the heart of the story. One of those feel good movies that you can watch over and over again. Also provides more evidence that some directors are at their best when forced to work within a limited budget as IMHO, this is Baz's best movie by some distance. Proof, if it were needed, that you dont need a massive budget and Hollywood stars to produce a movie of genuine, lasting quality.

  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    The Beyond (1981)
    Beyond1.jpg
    Classic Fulci spatterfest. That ending... they don't come much more downbeat than that. After watching the film, I went and re-read Warbeck's book. Such a shame he wasn't cast as Bond. He wasn't cast, yet he already had an idea of how he saw Bond, and also a directer he'd have wanted for his first Bond (and it wasn't John Glen). I'm inclined to believe that his near miss with Bond is more complex than the usual reason given.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited January 2017 Posts: 15,715
    A Monster Calls (2016)

    Now that was a real tear-jerker of a film. This film is about a kid who must deal with his terminally-ill mother, and bullies at school amongst other things. He gets his peace in drawing stuff, until one night, a big monster in the shape of a tree voiced by Liam Neeson, starts to visit him and helps him go through these tough times. The kid is absolutely fantastic, and Liam Neeson's voice is very much an international treasure. The visual effects are stunning, and the story is a beautiful one despite it being very, very sad. Another film that goes straight in my favorites of 2016.

    Bonus for those with good eyes: if you look closely at some of the family pictures in the kid's house...
    Liam Neeson in his proper human-likeness is in one of the pictures.
  • Posts: 2,107
    Today I watched real maen movies;

    Dirty Harry
    Magnum Force
    The Enforcer

    And I grew balls and hair on my chest. Tomorrow maybe the last two maen movies Sudden Impact and The Dead Pool.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    The Swan (1956)
    yi7BbRe.jpg

    I managed to get a remastered dvd of this romantic comedy. It stars Grace Kelly as Alexandria, a lady of noble blood. Her mother, played by the always excellent Jessie Royce Landis, trys to set her up with her cousin Albert, who also happens to be the heir to the throne, played by Alec Guinness. Louis Jourdan (Kamal Khan from OP) plays Dr. Nicholas Agi, Alexandria's fencing instructor and tutor to her younger brothers. He is in love with her, but has hidden it. Albert's arrival at the family household for a few days creates an environment where passions explode and complications arise on account of the romantic triangle. The film has a bittersweet ending, and was apparently made while Grace Kelly was courting Prince Rainier of Monaco, her soon to be real life husband. The performances are excellent across the board, but especially from Jourdan. Kelly is as beautiful & as regal as ever, and Guinness shows once again why he is one of the greats.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    @bondjames

    The Swan is truly one of the greats, thanks for reminding, I need to watch it soon.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited January 2017 Posts: 23,883
    @BondJasonBond006, I'd actually never watched it before. I really enjoyed it, but wish it was available on blu ray. The remastered dvd is pretty good quality, but this film would really pop on blu ray imho. The ending was not quite what I expected, as I was rooting for the other guy, but c'est la vie.
Sign In or Register to comment.