Last Movie you Watched?

1511512514516517989

Comments

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Iron Man 2 did one thing wrong... Justin Hammer. And that same mistake was repeated in the third film with furthermore, and at almost unforgivable rates. Age of Ultron did that with Baron Von Strucker, an important cornerstone to the Marvel universe, only to be killed at the beginning with the snap of a finger.
  • Posts: 380
    Iron Man 3 is a great Shane Black movie and a great Robert Downey Jr movie. However, its a terrible Iron Man movie.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Exactly.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Iron Man 2 did one thing wrong... Justin Hammer. And that same mistake was repeated in the third film with furthermore, and at almost unforgivable rates. Age of Ultron did that with Baron Von Strucker, an important cornerstone to the Marvel universe, only to be killed at the beginning with the snap of a finger.

    Funnily enough, Hammer is my favorite thing about that film. I wish he had returned for more at a later date, in fact.
    cooperman2 wrote: »
    Iron Man 3 is a great Shane Black movie and a great Robert Downey Jr movie. However, its a terrible Iron Man movie.

    @cooperman2, that's a fine way to put it. I agree.
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Iron Man 2 did one thing wrong... Justin Hammer. And that same mistake was repeated in the third film with furthermore, and at almost unforgivable rates. Age of Ultron did that with Baron Von Strucker, an important cornerstone to the Marvel universe, only to be killed at the beginning with the snap of a finger.

    Funnily enough, Hammer is my favorite thing about that film. I wish he had returned for more at a later date, in fact.
    I like Sam Rockwell a lot, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7. Don't get me wrong. It's always a pleasure having Sam waltzing around with dance moves to catchy music. But, that's Sam waltzing around with dance moves to catchy music. Not Justin Hammer. Far from being Justin Hammer.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    They are all good.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Iron Man 2 did one thing wrong... Justin Hammer. And that same mistake was repeated in the third film with furthermore, and at almost unforgivable rates. Age of Ultron did that with Baron Von Strucker, an important cornerstone to the Marvel universe, only to be killed at the beginning with the snap of a finger.

    Funnily enough, Hammer is my favorite thing about that film. I wish he had returned for more at a later date, in fact.
    I like Sam Rockwell a lot, @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7. Don't get me wrong. It's always a pleasure having Sam waltzing around with dance moves to catchy music. But, that's Sam waltzing around with dance moves to catchy music. Not Justin Hammer. Far from being Justin Hammer.

    I never go into a Marvel film expecting to see the comics faithfully adapted, so I didn't really feel disappointment towards Hammer. He made me laugh, that was all I asked of him.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    cooperman2 wrote: »
    Iron Man 3 is a great Shane Black movie and a great Robert Downey Jr movie. However, its a terrible Iron Man movie.
    I can agree with this. Very similar to SF in that regard.
  • QsAssistantQsAssistant All those moments lost in time... like tears in rain
    Posts: 1,812
    The Iron Man movies for sure decreased in quality as they went on but they are still enjoyable. The first was just epic and awesome in so many ways. One of my favorite shots in a superhero movie is when Iron Man is walking away from the tank as it explodes. It's just so badass looking.
    I really enjoy Iron Man 2 and disagree that it isn't memorable. I remember when War Machine came on the screen. I was so excited to see that damn suit.
    Iron Man 3 was a major let down and so far is the only MCU movie that I haven't seen in theaters and is the only one that I've seen once. They ruined Mandarin and it just felt so disconnected from the first two.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,602
    It's bizzare yet entertaining at the same time.
  • Posts: 12,524
    The Conversation (1974). At least a Top 100 film for me - absolutely terrific. And ever so relevant for today's times.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    FoxRox wrote: »
    The Conversation (1974). At least a Top 100 film for me - absolutely terrific. And ever so relevant for today's times.

    I need to rewatch that again. Not many films can portray paranoia that perfectly, and it's so prophetic for where we are now. It's also one of the many reasons why I think Coppola owned the 70s. What an output for just a decade!
  • Posts: 12,524
    Yes he was excellent in the 70s. Conversation is just an amazing film - my third favorite of Coppola's.
  • Posts: 12,524
    My own Top 5 is:

    1. The Godfather
    2. The Godfather Part II
    3. The Conversation
    4. Apocalypse Now
    5. The Rainmaker

    Not crazy about the rest I have seen. But love those ones.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Imho
    Godfather- incredible
    Godfather 2- better
  • edited May 2017 Posts: 12,524
    They're pretty much equals in my eyes. I just hold a slight personal preference for the first because of Brando. But I really love them nearly equally and think they are both incredible masterpieces.
  • Posts: 7,653
    For me Godfather & Godfather 2 are two parts of one story and are both excellent. Godfather 3 is just an epilogue that had some excellent ideas but lacked the execution and script both the originals had.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    I don't like Godfather 3.
    The plot is excellent but the characters are very poor
  • Posts: 12,524
    I like it okay. Decent film but obviously weak compared to the previous two.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    Have to say I quite liked Godfather 3, I had heard so much negativity about it I was expecting a real dog, so was pleasantly surprised.
  • Posts: 3,336
    I think that The Godfather: Part 3 is a good film. The first 2 are masterpieces however, and it is therefor easy to see why it has got a bad reputation.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,086
    Layer Cake

    Really fancied seeing this and realised I had got rid of my DVD copy when I moved! I found it was on Netflix luckily.

    Great film and one of my favourite British crime films.

    Daniel Craig is just ace in this and you can see what the Bond producers saw in what would make Craig a great 007.

    Great cast all round though.
  • DaltonCraig007DaltonCraig007 They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    edited May 2017 Posts: 15,723
    Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017)

    This latest outing, the 5th in the franchise, is finally the 1st of the 4 sequels to finally make me as entertained since the original Jack Sparrow adventure in 2003. Now, while I thought the 2nd and 3rd film were still pretty good, I though that each sequel felt longer and longer than the previous film, and that action scenes felt to take longer and longer to kick into gear. This being the shortest in the franchise, it is literally jam packed with thrilling, OTT action scenes. However, I must warn that the entire film is played for laughs, especially since Johnny Depp seemed to be visibly enjoying itself was let loose on the set to be as crazy as possible. And he did not disappoint, Depp was a total riot. The action scenes, while very impressive, literally had no sense of danger, as there were gags, one liners and whatnot every 30 seconds, not that I mind of course. Javier Bardem as the main villain gave us another totally unhinged performance (and they even give him an intro scene similar to the one he had in SF). I would rank this latest Jack Sparrow adventure as my 2nd favorite in the franchise (behind 'Curse of the Black Pearl'). If you want 2 hours of pure, total, mindless entertainment that makes absolutely zero sense, but will give you a laugh a minute, than this film is all that you need.

    Final note: I loved the cameo of
    Paul McCartney, who was revealed as Sparrow's uncle, and thus the brother of Keith Richards's character in previous films.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited May 2017 Posts: 24,264
    ALIEN COVENANT

    AlienCovenant_FRFA.jpg?itok=8df4-sXO

    Expectation is a resentment waiting to happen. That's why I deliberately kept my expectations low for ALIEN COVENANT and went to watch the film twice in two days' time. Here are my thoughts.

    When PROMETHEUS was announced, I was thrilled beyond belief. Surely Ridley Scott, director of the original ALIEN, wasn't going to let me down. Sadly, Scott, now in his seventies, wanted to tell a "2001"like story about life and death, about creation and evolution, about the end and the beginning and therefore not about a frightening xenomorph driving us to the edge of our seats. My hypothesis then was (and still is) that Fox said no to an expensive philosophical film unless it be tied in with an established film series. An 'Alien' prequel was the next logical step. Except that PROMETHEUS wasn't a prequel to ALIEN but at best a spin-off series revolving around the anonymous "space jockey" in the "derelict ship" and his race. Any connections with ALIEN were incidental at best and in fact seemed compromised. The result, a beautiful yet hardly original existentialist essay, took the ALIEN series away from the titular Alien. However, Dark Horse Comics managed to convincingly unite the 'Engineers', the 'Aliens' and the well-known 'Predators' under two very successful titles, FIRE AND STONE and LIFE AND DEATH. Through these, I managed to spot potential for a PROMETHEUS sequel, taking the Engineers to a more legitimate Alien prequel.

    Naturally, when ALIEN COVENANT was announced, this is where my mind immediately went, especially given the promises made at the end of PROMETHEUS. But when Neill Blomkamp started toying around with the idea of doing a direct sequel to ALIENS, I switched sides in less than a heartbeat. I wanted this film, more than another Scott film. Then Fox, against all odds, allowed Scott's sequel to PROMETHEUS to take precedence over Blomkamp's project. I was back at square one.

    Or was I? Because ALIEN COVENANT is a sequel to PROMETHEUS as much as PROMETHEUS was a prequel to ALIEN, i.e. barely. ALIEN³ may have upset many people but ALIEN COVENANT cares even less about continuity. Specific elements are retained from PROMETHEUS but the wider plot has been thrown in the bin with a single expensive and very good looking scene. Suddenly, so much of what was established previously seems unimportant now, without consequence, begging the question why we even bothered at the end of PROMETHEUS.
    Are we ever going to know about the ship on LV-426? David single-handedly wiped out the entire populace of the Engineers, or so it would seem. Unless they have a true home planet somewhere else, all the questions raised about them shan't be answered. In fact, why was so much time spent on them in PROMETHEUS, considering how little they matter here?

    But, one thing is true for sure; we get our xenomorph back, in some shape or form. So the posters and trailers didn't lie this time. Though in fairly small doses, scary and visceral scenes are shown and the eerie score enhances the effect. The acting is overall very strong, with Fassbender doing a remarkable job. And the photography treats us to fascinating visuals.

    All is well then? I'm not sure. That second viewing certainly paid off, as my reset expectations permitted more room for praise for what I was getting and less for the tremendous disappointment over what I wasn't getting. But while that may be so, I'm not entirely comfortable with, for example, the climax of the film.
    The 'shock' of having an alien stowaway aboard the ship and then the final confrontation during which it gets sucked into space, is something we've already seen in, ALIEN, ALIENS, ALIEN RESURRECTION and even the video game ALIENS: COLONIAL MARINES. Surely they can come up with something new. Yes?

    Again I have this feeling that Scott had to do a lot of compromising. He got to make a sequel to PROMETHEUS but without it being too much of a sequel to PROMETHEUS, caring more about it being a direct prequel to ALIEN, which I'm not sure it actually is. Furthermore, I really don't need all the philosophical musings about creation in an Alien movie. Since ALIEN, the xenomorph seemed to possess a fairly stable biology, with small alterations allowed depending on the host (e.g. the 'bull' or 'dog' alien from ALIEN³.) I never wondered nor cared about the origin of this species; it is as Ash described it to us and that's scary enough for me. It's the perfect living organism, it'll patiently wait for us to come too close and then it will strike. PROMETHEUS and ALIEN COVENANT make it look as if our beloved xenomorph is only a by-product of evolutionary biology taken to a sped-up, experimental phase. Thus, the lovecraftian element of cosmicism, which had always been firmly present in the Alien series until PROMETHEUS, is now completely taken from us.
    This is no longer a species that came from elsewhere, from an unspecified world completely outside the realm of human affairs, much more powerful than we will ever be, capable of running us down overnight despite our advanced technology, and therefore incredibly scary. No, instead this is now the product of David's genetic toy-box, and since David is man-made, it's in some weird sense our own product. Granted, David couldn't have "made" this alien species; he did, however, seem to have manipulated--engineered if you like--its evolution. And since he's in possession of facehugger eggs, one wonders if he has a pet queen stowed away somewhere too.

    I'm not entirely dissatisfied with ALIEN COVENANT, but neither do my hopes feel even modestly fulfilled by it. It's not a resentment from my part, but even after two viewings I'm left slightly unsure about where I stand. I'm positive, but not to the extreme. This series is going into Star Wars prequel territory with its own prequels. It tries to suddenly add so many new layers and dimensions to a simple but perfectly sterile concept. The black ooze is what the midichlorians are to the Star Wars universe, the Engineers are like the Gungans almost--perhaps less annoying but hardly more relevant. The 'creation' element is an unwanted elaboration on something that works best when kept simple, concise, pristine and straight-forward. All we truly want is a scary, visceral stalker experience with, if so desired, a strong sexual subtext. Less is more. I'm even happier now that Villeneuve was hired to direct BLADE RUNNER 2049. Scott, like other directors of a certain age, wants to lift his own creations to higher intellectual and philosophical levels while most of us just seek the base thrills of those first two films in the Alien series.

    Overall, my impressions of ALIEN COVENANT aren't quite as negative as I've perhaps made it look. The Covenant crew is perfectly likeable and what little action or horror we get certainly is worth the time it takes to sit through all the dialogue and exploring in between. It's in many ways a solid sci-fi B-movie, albeit a very expensive one, and it looks great. There's some enthusiasm inside me for a third film, though with the caveat that if that one doesn't
    bring a derelict space ship to LV-426, meanwhile transmitting an SOS into space for WY and the Nostromo to pick up
    ,

    I'm really going to go 'Star Wars Prequel' rage all over these latest additions in a film series I hold very dear. So far, my ranking goes:

    1 - ALIEN & ALIENS
    2 - a ton of comics
    3 - ALIEN³ and some of the video games
    4 - ALIEN COVENANT & PROMETHEUS
    5 - AVP and AVP: REQUIEM (yes, I rather like those in some weird, guilty pleasure kind of way)
    6 - ALIEN RESURRECTION

    ALIEN COVENANT has its moments. In the more technical departments, it's a nearly flawless film. Your viewing experience will only be tainted, if at all, by how much you care about continuity, consistency, staying close to the original, honouring the legacy of ALIEN and so on. Most of all, don't expect Scott to be in the same place he was in in '79; he isn't. He's an auteur now. He used to be an artist, a visionary, an impressionist who cared about the ALIEN and BLADE RUNNER experience more than about the ALIEN and BLADE RUNNER story. But now he has things to say, not just show. And that he uses the Alien series as canvas for that, is coming close to being an inexcusable, irredeemable crime.

    I had a good time with ALIEN COVENANT, especially the second time, but if another film is made, I hope it's Blomkamp's.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    under construction

    Was it any good?

    KILLER ELITE

    Good way to spend a couple of hours. Nothing special.
  • Posts: 12,524
    Second watch of The Night of the Hunter (1955). One of the best films ever - and one of my favorites. Pure excellence.
  • 001001
    Posts: 1,575
    Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)
    Very disappointing film ................
  • Posts: 6,022
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    under construction

    Was it any good?

    KILLER ELITE

    Good way to spend a couple of hours. Nothing special.

    Which version ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killer_Elite

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killer_Elite_(film)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Gerard wrote: »
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    under construction

    Was it any good?

    KILLER ELITE

    Good way to spend a couple of hours. Nothing special.

    Which version ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Killer_Elite

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killer_Elite_(film)

    The 2011 film. Statham takes on the SAS.
  • QsAssistantQsAssistant All those moments lost in time... like tears in rain
    Posts: 1,812
    Logan

    Such a great film. At some point this week I need to watch the Noir version. I have a feeling it'll be the better of the two.
Sign In or Register to comment.