It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The ending was good. Not quite what I was expecting though.
I couldn't see the film ending any other way, I remember when it came out quite a few people saying it was a cop out and too Hollywood.
It makes perfect narrative sense and plays into the Nicholas Van Horn's feelings on getting older and becoming obsessed with his career as well as his preoccupation with his Father's fate.
Not top tier Fincher but brilliant nonetheless and one of Douglas' finest performances in my view.
I expected either
I have the Restoration version of the film from the UK, it appears to be released after the Criterion Bluray. Nonetheless the picture looks great.
Audrey Hepburn has something, you can't take your eyes of her, the only contomparey actress who has that I think is Gal Gadot.
True, I am watching a few scenes from Charade again now, I think I am ready to go through all my Hitchcock films again gave them a break for a few years, Grant was great in Suspicion, Notorious, To Catch a thief, North by Northwest all classics.
Will do may watch it tonight I have a week off work, there are a few films and shows I need to catch up on.
It looked a bit cheesy in the trailers I saw, but everyone seems to be loving it. I've got it in my Netflix Queue to check out eventually. I know those red-band trailers certainly weren't shying away from the amount of gore on display.
I was pleasantly surprised and really enjoyed this. The sugary, rather sickly feeling of the original seems to have been replaced by a real poignancy. Pierce isn't in the film as much but there's a nice nod to his SOS duet from the original, and it's good to see him having fun during the Dancing Queen number.
I've always had a soft spot for ABBA since listening to them in my mum's car as a kid. After coming back tonight I think they may be my all time favourite band.
Some of the CGI was excellent then we had scenes with sub standard effects and poor green screen. Thankfully I was fully invested in some great characters, the actors and script elevated this film despite some pretty poor brand new looking costumes they had to wear.
The film is frustrating because I really think the potential for a great film was there.
Midway through the film I would have ranked this top five or even challenging for top spot in the MCU, unfortunately the film drops off quite dramitacally.
Some one like Mahershala Ali would have made a great antagonist, Michael B. Jordan was miscast he was not a convincing threat.
Mahershala Ali was too busy being Luke Cage's best villain.
He was great in Luke Cage
I had, perhaps unforgivably, not seen this first entry in the Equalizer franchise before last night. Despite being a big fan of Denzel, I just never felt the need to get round to it and I'm not entirely sure why. Although I've never really seen an episode of the 80's tv series from start to finish either, I recall my father watching them when they were on tv. I used to catch a few minutes here and there, and remember Edward Woodward, the funky score and the Jag. The trailers didn't give me that vibe at all, and so I think that might have put me off.
Anyway, I happened to see the sequel to this film a few months back in the theatre while on holiday, and really enjoyed it. It was tense and boasted excellent performances from Washington and Pedro Pascal in particular. So given all the furor in the media recently about director Antoine Fuqua's comments re: a black Bond, I felt compelled to finally see the first film, and I'm glad I did. This is basically a vehicle for Denzel to showcase his action chops, break some foreigner's bones and whoop some 'a' - all of which he does rather convincingly. Like fellow butt kickers Brian Mills and John Wick, Robert McCall minds his own business, until he is crossed - then woe betide his hapless foes. The film has far less raw action than the Wick films though, and it's a different style too. I feel this is more focused on characters and suspense. The whole thing pretty much rests on Denzel's charismatic star power, as there is little background exposition or context here. The audience has to buy that he's a good person and that he will look out for the little guy and do the right thing. That's easy to do in this case because....well because it's "Denzel". Marton Csokas, David Harbour, Melissa Leo, Bill Pullman and Choloe Grace Moretz also star.
"Who are you", his foes often ask McCall, prior to meeting their gruesome fate. He's a well trained killing machine who shouldn't be crossed, but also a man with heart. Recommended.
Interesting read... I myself have not rushed to see either film, I watched the TV show starring the great Woodward as a kid, the new movie trailers did not appeal to me at all. I may give the first film a look, I noticed it was on Sky Movies.
Don't expect any of the groovy score,its not in it at all.
The 80"s was the decade of great themes. As we're the 60"s and 70"s. Not so many great themes these days.
John Carpenter's 1982 Lovecraftian horror flick THE THING is a genuine masterpiece. Having seen it over 20 times now, but for the first time in BR quality, I can safely say that film still holds up, including its practical effects. Why critics and audiences alike failed to recognise and appreciate the pure brilliance of the film back in the day, is beyond me. E.T. walked away with all of our praise in '82, but that's no reason for critics to give such vile and downright destructive responses to THE THING. Carpenter lost projects and contracts over the negative press his fantastic film somehow managed to gain. If fear of the unknown is the greatest fear known to man, as H.P. Lovecraft, who clearly inspired Carpenter while making this film, once stated, then I'm terrified, for it is entirely unknown and unclear to me why THE THING was first met with such harsh criticism before being picked up, a mere few years later, as one of the greatest horror films ever made. Not entirely different in tone and concept from ALIEN, though arguably less loaded with metaphor and symbolism, somehow THE THING was looked down upon like the most unholy and immoral piece of filth, a damnation Carpenter took very personally at the time. Like him, I'm baffled. Though vindication swiftly befell THE THING, a lot of irreparable damage had already been done to it and to Carpenter's career. I'm glad he struck back with a spiritual sequel, PRINCE OF DARKNESS, in '87, but while highly entertaining and certainly also honoring Lovecraft's Cosmicism, it still qualifies as a lesser film than THE THING.
Combining the paranoic twists of Campbell's story WHO GOES THERE with Rob Bottin's unbelievably convincing creature designs and throwing in some underrated acting performances and an iconic score, the entire film is a celebration of awesome creativity and a deep understanding of our base fears. Cundey's naturalistic cinematography transports us to the seclusive and isolated settings of Lovecraft's AT THE MOUNTAINS OF MADNESS, allowing the elements to provide an impenetrable barrier, thicker than any wall of bricks and mortar so to speak. A remnant of 70's horror sensibilities, the film's ending provides little comfort, allowing the horror to live on in our minds even when the film is over. Imagine the possibilities of sequels taking 'the thing' to more populated areas. It could have been like Kaufman's 1978 INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS had a baby with Cronenberg's 1983 film VIDEODROME, organic horror combined with the exquisite terror of paranoia on a slightly grander scale. Alas, THE THING suffered the curious fate of being relegated to a cult status, effectively preventing it from ever spawning "myth" expanding sequels which might have cost a little more but could, in good hands, have taken the horrors of THE THING even further.
Though I consider myself a fan of Carpenter's HALLOWEEN first and foremost, THE THING ranks almost as high in my list. They are completely different though. One explores fears which are mostly known to us: the fear of being stalked by a killer who cannot be bargained with and who will patiently wait to strike when we're mostly alone, in the dark and not really paying close attention. The other explores our fear of what is clearly incomprehensible to the human mind, of what defies our perception of "reality", of what is so much bigger than our world, our biology and our logic. Carpenter caught lightning in a bottle twice, something those critics with a silver spoon up their arses can, at best, be jealous of.
The 2011 prequel is another case of "Dimi versus the world". Once again, a film called THE THING failed to break even, and this time it had everything to do with the fact that the film is, narratively and aesthetically, a copy of Carpenter's film. But with a good cast--yes, I have been in love with Mary Elizabeth Winstead ever since I saw her in SCOTT PILGRIM VERSUS THE WORLD- and some impressive, photorealistic CGI, THE THING 2011 not only manages to stay strong in the shadow of Carpenter's film, it also pays incredible attention to detail, allowing the events of this more recent film to tie in neatly with those of the 1982 one. Noticed the axe, the block of ice, the layout of the Nors research station and the words on the helicopter? Some folks did their homework, I can assure you. I respect this film because it gives a continuity buff like myself everything he wants out of a prequel. And while the 2011 THING is a retread of the '82 THING in almost every possible way, it still manages to thrill and scare, and it even leaves a few interesting doors open at the end. Unfortunately, once again, critics and audiences failed to be convinced, and so I presume we have reached a dead end again.
Thus ends the tragedy which is my love for THE THING and the critics' hatred of THE THING. And also for and of THE THING. You can follow me, right? :) My point is, I love both film and I strongly recommend that you watch at least Carpenter's original.
While I like a dark ending although they've become a bit of a cliche now
I think him going through all of that for it to be real or he had ended up taking the wrong route and ruining the whole scheme would have been too much the way they ended it with Nicholas getting a life lesson works much better than ending it on a total downer.
Don't forget this is Fincher following up Se7en, my bet is he'd already gone and done one of the cinema ultimate downers and for him to play the same trick again in his next film I think he would have thought has cheap so the fact he goes against that expectation makes total sense to me and the end of The Game going the way it does plays into that.
Halloween is definitely a hugely influential and briliant film but for me The Thing is Carpenter's definitive statement, it's a masterpiece and top 10 for me.
The critics of the time didn't get it and the fact now it regularly garners 5 star reviews and is regarded highly by many shows that sometimes a film needs time to seep into popular culture for it to be truly appreciated and now The Thing is truly that.
A lot of Carpenter films seemed to have been victims of the same initial reactions and reappraisals.
Assault On Precinct 13 was greeted with similar critical reaction, if I'm not mistaken. Many just weren't sure what to make of him as a filmmaker, I guess.
Frequency
Out of Time
Enjoyed all 3.
I saw it in preparation for the sequel, SKJELVET (The Quake) which hits cinemas soon. As far as disaster films go, it is probably the best I have seen, but the sequel looks even better.Well-made and tense.
That s him. Kristoffer Joner.
It is referenced in the film.
I enjoyed that. It bears a few similarities to American disaster films in that its characters are a bit hokey, but the film builds up to the actual event so well and it's such a great payoff that it elevates itself above its peers.
Wow that brought memories back..thats exactly it ..it could have been used...and Robert McCall was British..too many British heroes ?!
1. Last Crusade
2. Raiders of the Lost Ark
3. Temple of Doom
They're all great though! Super fun and rewatchable films. Let's not talk about that other one though.
It’s one of my wife’s favorite film and it was the choice between this and Pearl Harbor I choose this without hesitation. And why not it’s a nice slice of 80’s life Nicolas Cage is fantastic. The whole movie while short is quite nice.
Films I have seen in 2018 (I don't think I am splitting up bond and non bond this year as I don't know how many I am actually gonna see)
1. Batman Begins
2. Casino Royale
3. The A-team
4. Mission impossible fallout
5. The final girls
6. Clue
7. The Saint
8. Taken 2
9. The Shadow
10. Batman Gotham Knight
11. The Meg
12. Big trouble little China
13. Taken
14. Ferris buller's day off
15. Valley girl
16. Nonstop
17. Batman Mask of the Phantasm
18. Unknown
19. Classic Artists presents Yes
20. Stand By Me
21. Before Sunrise
22. A walk among the Tombstones
23. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
24. Goonies
25. Before Midnight
26. Revenge of the nerds
27. Grease
28. Before Sunset
Before series
1. Before Sunrise
2. Before Midnight
3. Before Sunset
Stephen King movies
1. Stand By Me
Corey Feldman movies
1. Stand by me
2. Teenage mutant ninja turtles
3. Goonies
Movies from 2018
1. Mission impossible fallout
2. The Meg
Taken Series
1. Taken 2
2. Taken
Liam Neeson (sort of) retrospective series
1. Batman Begins
2. The A-team
3. Taken 2
4. Taken
5. Non Stop
6. Unknown
7. A walk among the tombstones
Batman/Dc films ( as I can guarantee I will see more then just Batman Begins this year)
1. Batman Begins
2. Batman Gotham Knight
3. Batman Mask of the Phantasm
Films in 2018
1. Mission Impossible Fallout