Last Movie you Watched?

1846847849851852983

Comments

  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,996
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    I watched Angels & Demons yesterday. Honestly, I don't think it's that bad. I love Rome (actually used to live there, so obviously have a soft spot for it), it has a fine cast, it's well-paced, I quite dig the ancient conspiracy stuff that's going on and it's full of Lancia's and Alfa's!

    I liked it a lot. It's a pretty close adaptation of the enjoyable book.

    The whole trilogy was hammered by critics. However they are enjoyable fun, even Inferno was decent enough for me.

    I have yet to read the book, so the film will have to wait... 😁
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    DIE HARD... I've been a fan since 1989-- I was 14 and my best buddy and myself rented it.
    I have seen the film countless times and, in my estimation, I declare this the greatest action film in cinema history.
    The structure is air tight-- and not a single frame is wasted.
    It's not about "wild and crazy stunts" but action sequences that have genuine stakes.
    Although it is 32 years old, it stands head and shoulders above other action films.
    Despite all our technology, we can't match this masterpiece-- all the characters are great fun, the dialogue is crisp and tight. It looks amazing after all these years with a great soundtrack. And the story is simple and is really about a man trying to save his marriage!
    The film took care to squeeze out every bit of tension.
    It's just a giant amongst the others.
    Merry Christmas to one of my all time favorite Holiday films, and my favorite action film (bar none).
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    edited December 2020 Posts: 8,216
    peter wrote: »
    DIE HARD... I've been a fan since 1989-- I was 14 and my best buddy and myself rented it.
    I have seen the film countless times and, in my estimation, I declare this the greatest action film in cinema history.
    The structure is air tight-- and not a single frame is wasted.
    It's not about "wild and crazy stunts" but action sequences that have genuine stakes.
    Although it is 32 years old, it stands head and shoulders above other action films.
    Despite all our technology, we can't match this masterpiece-- all the characters are great fun, the dialogue is crisp and tight. It looks amazing after all these years with a great soundtrack. And the story is simple and is really about a man trying to save his marriage!
    The film took care to squeeze out every bit of tension.
    It's just a giant amongst the others.
    Merry Christmas to one of my all time favorite Holiday films, and my favorite action film (bar none).

    It really is quite astonishing that the film is as good as it is considering the haphazard nature of the production. It almost seemed doomed to fail yet everything about it works perfectly.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,620
    A Christmas Story (1983).

    My favorite movie. So flawless, even if you love it or hate it, it’s still so relatable, thanks to it’s many subplots. This is one movie that I will always recommend.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,785
    I listened to Jean Shepherd himself read his "story" ("Duel In The Snow, Or, Red Ryder Nails the Cleveland Street Kid") on WAMU Radio 88.5 FM tonight, @MaxCasino, alongside Old Time Radio dramas. A 1974 broadcast recorded on WOR AM.



    Was hoping to watch it in a local theater this season (I have it on Bluray). May still get to see another Yuletide staple in that venue: Die Hard.

    The movie is a joy to experience. How the stars aligned for director Bob Clark to assemble this product is a Christmas miracle.

    med_red_ryder.jpg
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 4,615
    "Avengers: Endgame"

    Only my second viewing. Still really enjoyed it. The key for me is, unlike many action movies, they never forget that character is at the core of the movie and there is "time to breath" re character interaction between the set pieces. It's not perfect but they had so much to do re dealing with the plot that it really is very good.

    I don't think it's coincidence that the end titles are a tribute to Star Trek as they also understood the key role of character when balanced with action. IMHO, The Avengers is closer in spirit to the original ST movies than the modern ST tosh.

  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,996
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    A Christmas Story (1983).

    My favorite movie. So flawless, even if you love it or hate it, it’s still so relatable, thanks to it’s many subplots. This is one movie that I will always recommend.

    Definitely one of the best Christmas films.

    No other film has captured that feeling of being a kid on Christmas morning like this does.

    Caught the last twenty minutes many years ago and have watched it every year since 😁
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 17,753
    24 Hours to Kill (1965).
    A decent enough mid-60's thriller about an airplane crew stuck in Beirut for 24 hours. During their stay there they get into trouble with a smugling gang. Although Lex Barker is the star of the film, it is Mickey Rooney's role and performance that stands out.

    The film has a bit of that Eurospy feel (and quality) to it, and fans of the genre might find it entertaining.
  • 007InAction007InAction Australia
    Posts: 2,526
    Return of the Jedi (1983)
    My 3rd favourite star wars film.
    returnofthejedi.jpg?format=1500w
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    Hard Kill

    Avoid this movie at all costs. The plot is thinly scraped to make sure there's an excuse for the terribly shot action scenes and the performances are so phoned in you can practically see the phone itself. I watched it on Netflix, and I sincerely want the money I didn't spend to see it back.
  • Posts: 5,993
    Not movies, but they've been aired in british theaters, so they qualifies :

    Yesterday, Michael Ball & Alfie Boe: Back Together - Live in Concert : Always a joy to see them, and to relive the experience I had in Cardiff in march. Of course, this time, Luke Evans wasn't there, but still enjoyable nonetheless.

    Today : Riverdance - The 25th Anniversary Show: Live In Dublin. Still great after all these years, although one disappointment : one of my favourite numbers ("Heal Their Hearts / Freedom") had been cut. But apart from that, really good. Next, I'll buy and watch the Christmas concert of Katherine Jenkins.
  • Posts: 9,846
    Batman Returns
    A weird film on one hand penguin and cat woman are quite well different to their comic book selves on the other hand both actors are great in their parts however Keaton is honestly fantastic I almost think he is the best Batman period ... it’s a tough battle between him and Affleck I just wish he was given more to do

    Also why does Walken wants a power plant?
    Why did Tim Burton make this film?

    Films in 2020
    1. Casino Royale
    2. From Russia with love
    3. Batman Begins
    4. Jaws 2
    5. Macgyver lost treasure of Atlantis
    6. It’s the great pumpkin Charlie Brown
    7. When Harry meet sally
    8. Woodstock the movie
    9. Sherlock Holmes a game of shadows
    10. Planes trains and automobiles
    11. Ronin
    12. Fast times at ridgemont high
    13. Valley Girl
    14. Goldeneye
    15. Batman Returns
    16. A Charlie Brown thanksgiving
    17. The breakfast club
    18. Rolling stone Gimmie Shelter
    19. Octopussy
    20. Home alone
    21. The temptations
    22. Stand by me
    23. The Art of war
    24. The Prophecy
    25. Jaws 3
    26. No direction Home
    27. Rise of skywalker
    28. Casino Royale 1954
    29. Nosferato
    30. Pearl Harbor
    31. Little women
    32. Journey greatest hits live
    33. The Grateful Dead movie


    Bond films
    1. Casino Royale 2006
    2. From Russia with love
    3. Goldeneye
    4. Octopussy
    5. Casino Royale 1954


    Jaws films
    1. Jaws 2
    2. Jaws 3

    Charlie Brown Films

    John Hughes Films
    1. Planes trains and automobiles
    2. The breakfast club
    3.

    Batman Films
    3. Batman Begins
    4. Batman Returns

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    Warming up for the Holidays: Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, OHMSS, and Elf....
  • 007InAction007InAction Australia
    Posts: 2,526
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg
  • The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.
  • 007InAction007InAction Australia
    edited December 2020 Posts: 2,526
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,173
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,216
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.
  • The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.

    I don’t see how McGregor is forced to mimic Guinness. He brings a youthful energy with a bit of wit into the film.
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.

    Nor do I get the sense that Neeson didn’t want to be there. There are scenes where Neeson has a twinkle in his eyes. The problems with his character lie within the script if anything, not his actual performance. He does what he can, and he does a good job.
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.

    Ray Park is quite good as well. Wish there was more of a character there though. Thankfully Clone Wars expanded on Maul as a character.
  • 007InAction007InAction Australia
    edited December 2020 Posts: 2,526
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.

    I don’t see how McGregor is forced to mimic Guinness. He brings a youthful energy with a bit of wit into the film.
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.

    Nor do I get the sense that Neeson didn’t want to be there. There are scenes where Neeson has a twinkle in his eyes. The problems with his character lie within the script if anything, not his actual performance. He does what he can, and he does a good job.
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.

    Ray Park is quite good as well. Wish there was more of a character there though. Thankfully Clone Wars expanded on Maul as a character.

    True McGregor does brings a youthful energy but nothing like Mark hamill or Harrison ford and Carrie fisher, Alec Guinness who really are legends in the star wars movies.
    Everyone loves them.

    The acting in the Star wars sequels is good but the stories are bad imo.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 2,266
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.

    I don’t see how McGregor is forced to mimic Guinness. He brings a youthful energy with a bit of wit into the film.
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.

    Nor do I get the sense that Neeson didn’t want to be there. There are scenes where Neeson has a twinkle in his eyes. The problems with his character lie within the script if anything, not his actual performance. He does what he can, and he does a good job.
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.

    Ray Park is quite good as well. Wish there was more of a character there though. Thankfully Clone Wars expanded on Maul as a character.

    True McGregor does brings a youthful energy but nothing like Mark hamill or Harrison ford and Carrie fisher who really are legends in the star wars movies.
    Everyone loves them.

    The acting in the Star wars sequels is good but the stories are bad imo.

    I guess it just depends on who you ask, and what era of Star Wars they grew up in. Yes I wouldn’t say McGregor is on the level of Hamil, Ford, or Fisher as an actor, but that shouldn’t be a diss towards him. He’s really fun in those films, probably the best, and the only consistent element of the prequels, and I say that as someone who “likes” the prequels. As far as the sequels, I’m of the opinion that a lot of the performances in them seem uneven. John Boyega is good, but Daisy Ridley isn’t the strongest actress. Nor is Oscar Issac. I just find the characters of the sequel trilogy to be weak, and bland, but I’ll admit, I’ve only watched each sequel film once, and have never bothered to watch them since. Rogue One is phenomenal though, so I’ll give Disney credit for that.
  • 007InAction007InAction Australia
    Posts: 2,526
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.

    I don’t see how McGregor is forced to mimic Guinness. He brings a youthful energy with a bit of wit into the film.
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.

    Nor do I get the sense that Neeson didn’t want to be there. There are scenes where Neeson has a twinkle in his eyes. The problems with his character lie within the script if anything, not his actual performance. He does what he can, and he does a good job.
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.

    Ray Park is quite good as well. Wish there was more of a character there though. Thankfully Clone Wars expanded on Maul as a character.

    True McGregor does brings a youthful energy but nothing like Mark hamill or Harrison ford and Carrie fisher who really are legends in the star wars movies.
    Everyone loves them.

    The acting in the Star wars sequels is good but the stories are bad imo.

    I guess it just depends on who you ask, and what era of Star Wars they grew up in. Yes I wouldn’t say McGregor is on the level of Hamilton, Ford, or Fisher as an actor, but that shouldn’t be a diss towards him. He’s really fun in those films, probably the best, and the only consistent element of the prequels, and I say that as someone who “likes” the prequels. As far as the sequels, I’m of the opinion that a lot of the performances in them seem uneven. John Boyega is good, but Daisy Ridley isn’t the strongest actress. Nor is Oscar Issac. I just find the characters of the sequel trilogy to be weak, and bland, but I’ll admit, I’ve only watched each sequel film once, and have never bothered to watch them since. Rogue One is phenomenal though, so I’ll give Disney credit for that.

    Don't forget Alec Guinness he's great in star wars.

    I like Daisy Ridley in the sequels. I think she carries those films.
  • The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Liam Neeson does well but Ewan McGregor is forced to mimic Alec Guinness which doesn't work out that well.
    A lot of Wooden acting in it especially compared to the first 3 star wars films.

    I don’t see how McGregor is forced to mimic Guinness. He brings a youthful energy with a bit of wit into the film.
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    On the contrary, Neeson looks like he doesn't want to be in the movie whereas McGregor at least seems to be having some fun.

    Nor do I get the sense that Neeson didn’t want to be there. There are scenes where Neeson has a twinkle in his eyes. The problems with his character lie within the script if anything, not his actual performance. He does what he can, and he does a good job.
    The Phantom Menace (1999)
    Good story and action but bad acting spoils the film....
    Star_Wars_Phantom_Menace_1.jpg

    Liam Nesson and Ewan McGregor are the best parts of that film, in my opinion.

    Don't forget Ray Park.

    Ray Park is quite good as well. Wish there was more of a character there though. Thankfully Clone Wars expanded on Maul as a character.

    True McGregor does brings a youthful energy but nothing like Mark hamill or Harrison ford and Carrie fisher who really are legends in the star wars movies.
    Everyone loves them.

    The acting in the Star wars sequels is good but the stories are bad imo.

    I guess it just depends on who you ask, and what era of Star Wars they grew up in. Yes I wouldn’t say McGregor is on the level of Hamilton, Ford, or Fisher as an actor, but that shouldn’t be a diss towards him. He’s really fun in those films, probably the best, and the only consistent element of the prequels, and I say that as someone who “likes” the prequels. As far as the sequels, I’m of the opinion that a lot of the performances in them seem uneven. John Boyega is good, but Daisy Ridley isn’t the strongest actress. Nor is Oscar Issac. I just find the characters of the sequel trilogy to be weak, and bland, but I’ll admit, I’ve only watched each sequel film once, and have never bothered to watch them since. Rogue One is phenomenal though, so I’ll give Disney credit for that.

    Don't forget Alec Guinness he's great in star wars.

    I like Daisy Ridley in the sequels. I think she carries those films.

    Alec Guinness is great in anything, so I feel a bit blasphemous for forgetting him. For me it’s Adam Driver who carries the sequels. I don’t like Kylo Ren as a character, but Driver is a fantastic actor.
  • Posts: 4,615
    "Trial of the Chicago 7"

    Very good but Sorkin needs to stick to great writing. The direction just feels flat.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    Emma (2020)
    emma-movie-2020.jpg
    Anya Taylor Joy shines in this adaption of Jane Austen's Emma.

    The Oblong Box (1969)
    the-oblong-box-1969-alister-williamson-christopher-lee-review.jpg
    I recently re-watched Doctor Who: Balck Orchid, which is inspired by Poe's 'The Oblong Box'. I do wish the ending was different in regards Sir Edward.
  • j_w_pepperj_w_pepper Born on the bayou, but I now hear a new dog barkin'
    Posts: 9,026
    My wife's and my last two movie watches accidentally turned out to be a Franco Nero festival of some sort. The night before last, we watched Die Hard 2 (instead of the usual first instalment) as our initial Christmas film. That movie is actually a mess plot-wise. I'll never accept that, even if airport communications are jammed successfully by terrorists (Oh, wait...these are patriotic US troops, aren't they?), the officials shouldn't be able to pick up the phone and inform the FAA and other airports (and there are SCORES in a cirlce of about 100 miles around Dulles International) that their airport isn't operable and they should continue flying to whereever. So, it's a good action movie if one entirely suspends disbelief altogether, worse than with just about every Bond movie.

    But anyway, Franco Nero was good as the fake Latin American general that was supposedly extradited to the U.S.

    The next night (last) we watched the German courtroom drama Der Fall Collini (The Collini Case), based on a true story. Franco Nero, almost 30 years or so after Die Hard 2, plays a 1960s' Italian immigrant to Germany who suddenly kills an 80-year old German industrialist. In 2001, a young lawyer with half-Turkish background is appointed duty counsel and only belatedly discovers that the victim was the grandfather of his puppy love (Alexandra Maria Lara, Hitler's secretary in Downfall), and someone who helped and promoted him all his life. He still takes the case and finds out that his "mentor" once served as an SS officer in Italy who ordered a ten-to-one retribution for Nazis killed by partisans, and in the course had the Italian's father killed in 1944 or whatever year it was. In spite of some inaccuracies regarding the court proceedings (and yes, I am a lawyer), it is quite a gripping movie for those who enjoy courtroom movies and those about the Nazi period.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,173
    Emma (2020)
    emma-movie-2020.jpg
    Anya Taylor Joy shines in this adaption of Jane Austen's Emma.

    I'm starting to think that she is brilliant in everything that she does. Since The VVitch, Split and Emma, I've been keeping track of her with considerable interest. The Queen's Gambit proves my confidence in her justified. She's an amazing actress.
  • MajorDSmytheMajorDSmythe "I tolerate this century, but I don't enjoy it."Moderator
    Posts: 13,978
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Emma (2020)
    emma-movie-2020.jpg
    Anya Taylor Joy shines in this adaption of Jane Austen's Emma.

    I'm starting to think that she is brilliant in everything that she does. Since The VVitch, Split and Emma, I've been keeping track of her with considerable interest. The Queen's Gambit proves my confidence in her justified. She's an amazing actress.

    So far, I would absolutely agree with you. Morgan (the first film I saw her in, I really liked, but it didn't get muich attention), The Vvitch (I didn't like so much, but she carried the film superbly), then Split and now Emma. Haven't seen The Queens Gambit, but I am glad for her that it is getting a lot of buzz.
  • edited December 2020 Posts: 2,266
    Alfred Hitchcock’s Lifeboat

    Lifeboat stands out as a phenomenal and unique film from Hitchcock’s filmography. I think the ensemble cast is why it works; each role feels perfectly casted. I also like how some characters represent political/opposing idealogies. Kovak represents Communism. Rittenhouse represents Capitalism. For me the standout actors are Walter Slezak, William Bendix, and Canada Lee, all three of whom I find to be just brilliant. I like how the film keeps the true intentions of Slezak’s character ambiguous, it isn’t until the final 20 minutes that you realize what he’s really up too. The way they executed the storms as well was quite impressive. I think another big aspect as to why the film works is John Steinbeck’s script. The combination of Hitchcock and Steinbeck seems unlikely, yet produces brilliant results. I’m disappointed they didn’t work together again afterwards, but I think Steinbeck was never interested in writing films for Hollywood, it seemed him writing this for Hitchcock was his way of contributing, in some form, to the allied cause. I think it’s a shame this doesn’t get brought up as much as it should with regard to Hitchcock’s filmography. I think of all the Hitchcock films I’ve seen (somewhere between 12-15), this one stands far and above the others as my absolute favorite.
  • Posts: 7,653
    Lifeforce on Bluray, what a terrible movie but Mathilda May is certainly the saving grace, that said the book which I read was far better, but with the CANNON movie group you do not get great movie just fun movies and this movie is just that fun.
Sign In or Register to comment.