It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
First Look At BIRDMAN Costume! Michael Keaton Stalked By Iconic Superhero (Photos & Video)
Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=80618#WdCmibj89eg2Deqb.99
I need to make a distinction between Bruce Wayne and Batman.
Bruce Wayne
1) Bale: He's helped tremendously by the scripts and the other actors but I like the evolution he goes through, his imperfections and inner torments. He also knows how to deliver comedy without looking foolishly.
2) Keaton: Here's an actor who was best known for comedy when he suddenly delivered a warm and intelligent characterisation of Batman. A very close second.
3) Kilmer: I will be honest - the anger he displays when lecturing Dick feels sincere. I appreciate that. Not too good with the love scenes though.
4) West: He did what he could with the material that was given him at the time. Nothing too good but good enough for the time. As they say: it was good, but it's good that it was.
5) Clooney: He worked with the love scenes but with little else. He always carries that smirk, making his anger feel unbelievable.
Batman
1) Keaton: Oh dear, I was 7 when it happened, coming out of an Adam West Batman early childhood. The costume, the energy, the yellow logo. To this day, Keaton is still my favourite Batman. He's dark, in voice and style, and very believable.
2) Bale: The voice wasn't too big an issue with me to be honest. I like this Batman; I just like Keaton's a trifle more.
3) Kilmer: He gets a couple of amazing introductions in scenes throughout the film. His Batman is still cool.
4) Clooney: The nipples are terrible and the costume looks like it was pulled from a cybershop.
5) West: But his Batman was even worse. The costume's blue (granted, so it was in the comics) but then the ears and the very revealing mask... Nah, even as a child I found his Batman truly unconvincing. It was the 60s for sure.
Yeah, that was a big surprise at the time. I know now that is was such a surprise but I was far too young in '89 to realise Keaton's status of course. ;-)
Both Craig and Keaton were at first bug-eyed and then heralded. But CR and Batman proved all the doubters wrong. ;-)
Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=80766#KYdMRxFpt05f4dhA.99
(pause to consider)
Probably still the right decision. :))
probably a stunt double.
Keaton is the bad guy being held by Birdman.
Keaton is not a bad guy because he's cast as Birdman do some search before you post something.
Did you even read the article yourself?
Michael Keaton is on the far right! looking bad or thugish I might add. That's obviously someone else in the Birdman costume. Why don't you read the article completely before telling me I'm wrong. He might be Birdman, but right now, I see something else.
Yeah Keaton is not playing a bad guy.
I like the director and actor Affleck, and when it comes to convincing me it is all up to him and the part he gets to play.
"Texture should separate Batman from rest of JLA and Superman". This could mean that development of a JLA film is going faster than conceived, and that other designs of the supporting heroes may be what teams at Warner Bros. are working on right now.