Star Trek (1966 - present)

1272830323386

Comments

  • Posts: 12,526
    Murdock wrote: »
    RogueAgent wrote: »
    The rock and roll show of this is "THE OSGORNS!!!" =))
    Don't give me any ideas. ;)
    :))

    Me??? :-\" Never! ;) :))
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Here's something you'll get kick out of then. =))
    I'll keep it in a spoiler tag because the image is quite large.
    kk9BA8z.jpg
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Murdock wrote: »
    Here's something you'll get kick out of then. =))

    =)) OMG.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    Here's something you'll get kick out of then. =))

    =)) OMG.

    I got a similar reaction on the TrekBBS forums. :))
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Murdock wrote: »
    I got a similar reaction on the TrekBBS forums. :))
    I haven't been there in a while.

    Hey @Murdock, you must own TMP, but do you have the DE, or the theatrical Blu Ray? Or both?

  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    @chrisisall, I have the Director's Edition DVD but I don't have any TOS Trek films on Bluray yet.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Oh my, you simply *MUST* see TMP on Blu Ray! It's intoxicatingly pretty. You're too young to have seen it on the big screen, but let me assure you, the DE is fairly pale compared with that, and the BR...
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    I believe I saw a set at walmart. I may pick it up soon.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Murdock wrote: »
    I believe I saw a set at walmart. I may pick it up soon.
    STIV looks a LOT better on BR as well...
    :)>-
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    I believe I saw a set at walmart. I may pick it up soon.
    STIV looks a LOT better on BR as well...
    :)>-
    Wrath of Khan would be my most anticipated Blu Ray watch. With all the vibrant colors of Regula I and the Mutara Nebula. :D
  • Posts: 6,432
    Purchased Star Trek The animated series, had a vague memory of this from watching it decades ago. The episode Yesteryear written by D.C. Fontana is a standout its superb and would fit well into the original series. For anyone who has not watched Yesteryear I highly recommend it.
  • Posts: 6,432
    Murdock wrote: »
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    I believe I saw a set at walmart. I may pick it up soon.
    STIV looks a LOT better on BR as well...
    :)>-
    Wrath of Khan would be my most anticipated Blu Ray watch. With all the vibrant colors of Regula I and the Mutara Nebula. :D
    Wrath looks fantastic on Bluray, Wish they would give the special edition a full remaster. If only for the scene when Spock remarks on the definition of ego and the camera zooms in on Kirk.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Purchased Star Trek The animated series
    I have it; it's so much fun. Imagine me at 14 waking up early to see it on Saturday mornings...! Any new Trek, yo.
    :))
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Murdock wrote: »
    Wrath of Khan would be my most anticipated Blu Ray watch. With all the vibrant colors of Regula I and the Mutara Nebula. :D
    Yeah, but nothing beats this image I just photographed off my TV (TMP Blu Ray):
    SANY8430_zpspoqnn26b.jpg
  • edited March 2015 Posts: 1,310
    Surprised no one here has brought this up yet:

    http://variety.com/2015/film/news/star-trek-3-idris-elba-villain-cast-1201459368/

    Idris Elba is quite a familiar face around these parts, no?
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    Elba a villain in a movie written by Simon Pegg? Okay, count me in.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Is he going to play Dr. Daystrom? :D
  • Agent007391Agent007391 Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start
    Posts: 7,854
    It'd be interesting to see that, but Paramount probably doesn't remember him.
  • QBranchQBranch Always have an escape plan. Mine is watching James Bond films.
    Posts: 14,584
    Murdock wrote: »
    Here's something you'll get kick out of then. =))
    That was hilarious, Murdock! Well done. \:D/
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    QBranch wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    Here's something you'll get kick out of then. =))
    That was hilarious, Murdock! Well done. \:D/

    Thanks QBranch I had a lot of fun doing that. I had an idea for a sequel. The City on the Edge of Duke Nukem Forever. =))
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Something short and Sweet. ;)
    ds9___full_comic_by_comandercool22-d8nrjpa.jpg
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,801
    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAAHHAAHAHAAH!!!!!
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Thanks for posting, very enjoyable reading. :)
  • Posts: 6,432
    DrGorner wrote: »
    Thanks for posting, very enjoyable reading. :)
    Just read it myself were a few things I had not heard of before, can't beat the original series
    :)
  • edited June 2015 Posts: 1,310
    Over a year ago now (wow) I finished marathoning all of the Star Trek films. My old list from September 2013:

    1. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) - 8.5/10
    2. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) - 8/10
    3. Star Trek (2009) - 7.5/10
    4. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991) - 7.5/10
    5. Star Trek: The Motion Picture - Director's Edition (1979) - 7.5/10
    6. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986) - 7/10
    7. Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1982) - 6/10
    8. Star Trek: First Contact (1996) - 6/10
    9. Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989) - 5/10
    10. Star Trek: Nemesis (2002) - 5/10
    11. Star Trek: Insurrection (1998) - 5/10
    12. Star Trek: Generations (1994) - 4/10

    After some re-watching and reconsidering, I've made some adjustments. My new list:

    1. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) - 8.5/10 (even)
    2. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986) 7.5/10 (+.5 score / +4 spaces)
    3. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) - 7.5/10 (-.5 score / -1 space)
    4. Star Trek (2009) - 7.5/10 (even score / -1 space)
    5. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991) - 7.5/10 (even score / -1 space)
    6. Star Trek: The Motion Picture - Director's Edition (1979) - 6.5/10 (-.5 score / -1 space)
    7. Star Trek: First Contact (1996) - 6/10 (even score / +1 space)
    8. Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1982) - 6/10 (even score / -1 space)
    9. Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989) - 5/10 (even)
    10. Star Trek: Nemesis (2002) - 5/10 (even)
    11. Star Trek: Insurrection (1998) - 5/10 (even)
    12. Star Trek: Generations (1994) - 4/10 (even)


    Really enjoyed part IV this time, much more than I was expecting. You'll see that one was my biggest shake up. TMP was a little clunkier than I first remembered, though I did still appreciate its scope. I also don't care very much for any of the Next Gen films, but liked First Contact just a hair more than I remembered.
  • edited June 2015 Posts: 11,119
    It's official. Yesterday filming of the 13th Trek-movie "Star Trek Beyond" has begun. Actors Zoe Zaldana and Zachary Quinto were tweeting extensively about it yesterday:
    http://www.treknews.net/2015/06/24/star-trek-beyond-filming-begun/

    The nicest news about "Star Trek Beyond" is perhaps the fact that it will be much more space-exploration exploration-oriented. The film will deal entirely about the crew's five year mission towards strange new civilizations. It will truly go body where no one has gone before....

    That will mark a change for this upcoming film, as it's immediate two predecessors were mostly set around Earth and a typical villain that had to be fought.

    "Star Trek Beyond" will also mark the franchise's 50th anniversary. So it will most likely build up huge momentum when it premieres next year.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    More Space Exploration. That's what I've been wanting. Too much SAVE THE EARTH surrounding the last three movies.
  • Posts: 11,119
    Murdock wrote: »
    More Space Exploration. That's what I've been wanting. Too much SAVE THE EARTH surrounding the last three movies.

    Yup, fully agree. It's one of the reasons why I still prefer the TV-Series over many movies.

    The first "Star Trek" motion picture really had a nice Kubrick-esque space exploration vibe to it, which was almost instantly sacrificed when with "The Wrath Of Khan" a more Bond-esque villain's plot was used.

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Sounds good to me.
Sign In or Register to comment.