It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Here's another look at The Joker- I don't notice the tattoos here- the only tattoo I didn't care for was the one on his forehead. Other than that I like the look very much.
I like the teeth-- it shows lots of history. Who do you think knocked them out (multiple times)? Good ol' Batfleck!
Watched Assault on Arkham recently, on a positive note it was good, and read that The Suicide Squad film will look to draw from that source material.
"Calm Down! The Joker Will NOT Have Tattoos in 'Suicide Squad'"
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2015/04/26/calm-down-the-joker-will-not-have-tattoos-in-suicide-squad-2887773?lt_source=external,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,share_fb,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual,manual&fb_ref=Default
I never mentioned anything about which came first. I'm simply stating that Batman (who is a human) has zero chance to harm Superman in a fair fight. Which makes me wonder if a 'fight' even happens. Do you think Batman would stoop to using Kryptonite vs Superman though ?
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Zack Snyder said that Kryptonite doesn't exist in the Man of Steel-verse, so, we'll just have to see.
You implied that Batman was a lesser version of Bond, when in actuality he was around way before 007 so much as shot off a PPK. Anywho...
I love how Batman would be "stooping" in some way by using a tactical approach in taking down Superman. Doesn't make much sense to view it that way really, and besides, all's fair in the arena of war.
I think he might've meant he wasn't going to introduce it early on, but that it could appear later. I'm sure it exists in the universe; it has to. You need Superman to have some weakness after all. Hell, even with it he's so, so dull.
Either that, or everybody gets something that creates the Kryptonian atmosphere, like Zod's world engine, or ship.
http://comicbook.com/2015/04/29/batman-imax-poster-released-without-superman-logo/
Dark costume? It's just like the one from the comics, as is the gritty tone. I thought you'd be through the roof with this. Marvel's going to be getting darker in tone too soon, so I don't think you'll find too much sanctuary on that side.
I don't like how either Marvel or DC are doing it. I hate how both have outlined their superhero films clear till 2020, for two big reasons. One, things could go wrong between now and then that alters everything about that line-up-actors change, a movie fails to meet public expectations, filmmakers depart-and two, it ruins the surprise of what is to come for us fans. I'd like to get teased about figures like Black Panther, Miss Marvel and Dr. Strange in the films themselves instead of having their solo adventures uncovered in a few unsatisfying seconds at some press junket.
Sony does this too. When the Spider-Man reboot launched they'd already had the date for the sequel lined up, and the same with number three and the numerous spin-off films before two was wrapped up, as if they never saw a possible screw-up on the horizon. In this case, that exact thing happened-the franchise was scrapped and left in the dust after underwhelming returns and the continued displeasure of the audience.