SPECTRE: It grossed $880 Million Worldwide (..and 2015 was the biggest box office year so far)

1105106108110111152

Comments

  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited December 2015 Posts: 4,399
    .
  • HASEROT wrote: »
    mepal1 wrote: »
    HASEROT wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    I think the SF discussions were way more 'negative' up to just a few months ago, 3 full years after release. Fans of that film are probably glad that we've moved onto another target for discussion.

    Yes, and now we replace that by SP.

    thats how CR was after DAD.. and how QOS was after CR.. and how SF was after QOS.. and now SP after SF.. and you know what, it'll happen when Bond 25 comes out.. and Bond 26.. Bond 27.. and so on..

    best strap yourself in and get used to it.

    There's one difference though. 2015 is not 2006. 9 years ago the social media environment was a tinyyyy bit different. To state this with some sarcasm.

    Actually in 2006 the internet forums had some very hostile voices towards the Bond world, and its star.

    Until the movie appeared in cinema's, that's absolutely true yes.

    actually, on these boards, even after CR leading into and after QOS, there was still very much still a luke warm response towards Craig from many of the old forum members, who didn't prefer the new "Jason Bourne style" Bond films.

    Well that sells is really. All of Craig's outings had a lukewarm reception. Let's tell Craig he's fired. Next.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited December 2015 Posts: 4,399
    .
  • edited December 2015 Posts: 11,425
    I know from experience as someone who didn't like SF at all that there are people who just cannot deal with hearing criticism of their current favourite Bond movie or actor. It's a shame and slightly juvenile.

    I am a long term defender of Daniel Craig. I am also a big defender of QOS. But the moment I voiced criticisms of SF is was attacked by people on here as a troll and a 'Brosnan lover' (as if). Some members need to grow up a bit and chill out.

    I really enjoyed SP but at the same time can totally see where a lot of the critics are coming from. I mostly disagree with them but it doesn't make my blood boil just to see them share their views.

    It's more fun sharing contradictory ideas than everyone just mindlessly agreeing all the time and saying how great everything is.
  • edited December 2015 Posts: 2,015
    But I think SP needs a bit of counterbalancing. If I wasn't here, SP would easily be the worst Bond film ever.
    I think exactly the opposite. We just can't talk about the quality of the movie because you come and insult us because we dare to not find it pure unrivaled genius that put to shame the silliness of all the other Bond for stupid US viewers and other xenophobic comments you seem to like.

    The fact that absolutely no one has criticized Craig's acting and the fact that despite that you "asked" people here to say how great he was has been already noted here.

    IMO, the forum was a much friendlier place each time you left it for a few months in the past because of the clashes you had with other persons.

    We had to read here you searching for photos and the biography of a critic who dared to find SPECTRE meh, and to read you proving to us she was a hysterical and ugly feminist with a hidden agenda. How can you think the negativity here is caused by others ?
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited December 2015 Posts: 4,399
    .
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    edited December 2015 Posts: 41,011
    I loved SP and I am all for hearing any negative views or thoughts on it. Discussion is fun, and if we all got along and agreed 100% of the time (as I've said many times in the past), this place would be boring. If we don't disagree at times, there isn't much to discuss. It's not fair to insult those who loved it or those who didn't.

    We needn't go the way of making things personal and insulting one another in general, though. Please keep things on topic and stop attacking one another.
  • Posts: 725
    Guys, everyone back off a while. GG is a passionate Bond fan that has done tons of research for stats that we all enjoy reading no matter what our views are on Bond and other films. It's destructive to chase him away. Posters have strong feelings for a given film or actor and we all pop off to fast sometimes, me included and we can get on each other's nerves with certain posts, Everyone should just chill a bit, including GG. He plays a valuable role on the site, and if he is chased off, it will be the site's loss. You'll all miss his research info and arguing with him.
  • HASEROTHASEROT has returned like the tedious inevitability of an unloved season---
    edited December 2015 Posts: 4,399
    .
  • Posts: 158
    smitty wrote: »
    Guys, everyone back off a while. GG is a passionate Bond fan that has done tons of research for stats that we all enjoy reading no matter what our views are on Bond and other films. It's destructive to chase him away. Posters have strong feelings for a given film or actor and we all pop off to fast sometimes, me included and we can get on each other's nerves with certain posts, Everyone should just chill a bit, including GG. He plays a valuable role on the site, and if he is chased off, it will be the site's loss. You'll all miss his research info and arguing with him.



    Well said. Yes, I have been lurking for a long time, but followed GG's stats for a long time. He is an outstanding contributor to this forum. Thank you for saying so, Smitty, and thank you GG. I am not sure why my replies are always appearing in the blue box.
  • If everybody thought the same, these forums would be boring. However, there are some "Bond fans" praying for a Bond flop, they can´t stand Daniel Craig success as 007... and YES, it may be a anoying for true fans (as GG). The best thing is that SP is a big blockbuster and it will be a profitable movie for MGM and EON, so James Bond will return in a few years. :)>-
  • Posts: 1,098
    If everybody thought the same, these forums would be boring. However, there are some "Bond fans" praying for a Bond flop, they can´t stand Daniel Craig success as 007... and YES, it may be a anoying for true fans (as GG). The best thing is that SP is a big blockbuster and it will be a profitable movie for MGM and EON, so James Bond will return in a few years. :)>-

    I find it tragic, that there are a lot of so called Bond fans, who really celebrate every negative aspect of a film, if it stars a lead actor they don't like.
    They are deluded into thinking that if a film was to be a flop, then that actor would have to go, and somehow everything in the future would be to their liking.

    What some don't seem to realize is that film making is a serious, and risky financial business, and a major financial flop for a Bond film would more than likely end the franchise, or certainly put it on hold for a long time. Does LTK ring any bells?
    Plus, if a film were to fail, and a new lead actor was selected, that doesn't mean the naysayers would automatically like the new selection, plus the fact, the direction of the next film, may be not to everyone's liking anyway.

  • Posts: 6,601
    Thankfully all of this doesnt influence any of the important aspects of the film, so its just forum Bla.
  • edited December 2015 Posts: 45
    Pretty late to the party here but wanted to join the forum after seeing this topic. I too am a pretty die hard bond fan, having seen each film at least 2-3 times for the not so great to downright bad ones *cough* aVTaK *cough* and many many more times for the better ones, but anyways...

    I absolutely loved Skyfall (although not a huge fan of the 3rd act) and was thrilled when it reached a billion. As such I was anticipating SPECTRE probably more so than any other movie ever. Watching the reviews come out for the film were great at first, but just got worse and worse as some critics slammed it. This kind of worried me a bit, but being in the U.S., I sat back and watched how well it did in the UK at first and was very happy that even it if wasn't as good as Skyfall, it would still at least likely break a billion, especially with China coming so far since 2012.

    I've seen SPECTRE 4 times in theaters now, and am seeing it for a 5th with my good buddy who I've seen all of the films since Goldeneye with in theaters for the 2nd time (1st being Thursday opening) later this week. It's a great film, and I am hugely disappointed that it's not going to break a billion, especially with those China numbers. It actually is kind of sad that China has come so far, and SP couldn't break a billion, when Skyfall technically did it without China's help, if you look at the final numbers.

    I know it had a few things working against it (France attacks, currency conversions rates etc.) but I think really it's the film itself that ultimately has caused it to not break the billion.

    Even though it's a great film, I do have to say there are some problems with it, but what's strange is it's hard for me to put my finger on exactly what the problem was. I guess "pacing" is the easiest way to put it, as the pacing just seems off in the film, especially in the 2nd act, compared to Skyfall that was an absolute thrill ride through that 2nd act. Blofeld/Waltz definitely wasn't as good as he could have been either. The beginning (opening scene) and ending (3rd act + DB5 at the end) are far superior to my than Skyfalls opener and ending, so it's even more confusing to me why I still feel Skyfall is superior.

    I even did a break down, scene by scene of the two movies, rating each scene on a 1-5 scale to try and determine the problem.

    To my surprise, both movies ended up with the same score hah, yet I still feel Skyfall is pretty superior to SPECTRE. Not sure what it is.

    Anyways, I could go on for pages, but just wanted to pop in and join the community.

    For those interested in the breakdown I did, I'll paste it here. I'm sure most will not agree (everyone seems to love the train scene/fight, I was meh on it)


    Scale 1-5
    1 = Meh
    5 = Amazing

    Opening Scene
    Skyfall - Turkey Chase = 2
    SPECTRE - Mexico City Long Shot/Chopper = 4

    MI6/M Interaction
    Skyfall - Back From Death, Fitness/Phsych Tests, Judi Dench M, Meeting Mallory = 3
    SPECTRE - Mallory/Moneypenny = 2

    Q
    Skyfall - National Gallery = 3
    SPECTRE - Q's Workshop = 4

    Act 2 Begins
    Skyfall - Shanghai Jellyfish = 5 (AMAZING SCENE!)
    SPECTRE - Rome, Bellucci, and Secret Meeting = 3

    Act 2 Continues
    Skyfall - Macau Casino & Love Boat = 2
    SPECTRE - Austria, Pale King, Swann, & Plane vs Cars = 3

    Moving Along
    Skyfall - Island Rats = 4
    SPECTRE - Tangier L'American & Train = 1

    Act 2 Concludes
    Skyfall - London Subway & Public Inquiry = 4
    SPECTRE - Morocco Lair & Torture = 2

    Act 3
    Skyfall - Scotland Mansion = 2
    SPECTRE - London MI6 Sprint = 3

    Finishy
    Skyfall - THIS IS THE END = 2
    SPECTRE - BMT-216A = 5


    Skyfall - 27 = MUCH better middle part of movie
    SPECTRE - 27 = much better beginning and end


  • Posts: 7,653
    True fans come in all forms and you are not just a true fan if you think Craig is the best 007 yet. Your are a true fan of the 007 franchise if you spend as much time as we do on this forum. Time perhaps better spend on something else said my wife carrying a bucket of paint with a brush.
    While I find GG a somewhat overpowering presence when it comes to his defense of anything Craig, he is a knowledgeable fellow who does say interesting stuff. But that goes for a lot of people here.

    You are a troll if you come from Sweden/Norway and have certain features. You cannot call a Brit a German either (even if that came close in 1941).
  • I like your post, Goldeneye007. I just strongly disagree with two things: PTS in SF was very good and the train scene (ok, the train fight; the rest not so much) in SP is amazing.
  • edited December 2015 Posts: 11,119
    But I think SP needs a bit of counterbalancing. If I wasn't here, SP would easily be the worst Bond film ever.
    IMO, the forum was a much friendlier place each time you left it for a few months in the past because of the clashes you had with other persons.

    Shall I leave forever then? I actually agree with you. It's better if I leave forever, instead of returning...after a few weeks break.

    It's the same old story for me :-). In here, on my work, during my studies. I didn't graduate, I have no single paper. I can't keep my job. Usually after 9 months I get fired or moved to a different department. At university I was impossible to work with in projects and team research. As a young kiddo at highschool I was bullied to death.

    I am 33 now. I think it's better if I'm completely gone. You know? Hence why I lock myself up all day after work behind this computer. But even there....at the tiniest place I feel happy....even there the same happens.

    It's better if I go. Could you perhaps message me on [email protected] and remind me every once in a while that I should...stay away from this forum @Suivez_ce_parachute ? It would be greatly appreciated.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    We're not starting this dramatic garbage again. We've lost so many members lately over such infantile rubbish, and no more shall take such a route out of here. I've blocked the exit of the MI6 forums, in what I hope is a convincing enough symbolic gesture to keep everyones' feet well planted.

    If we worry about what one person says/thinks about us, and that opinion drives us to leave, we've begun to lose the plot. The spats between members is getting old, and if people aired grievances in a mature and professional manner instead of pointing fingers like a child and whining like one after they got yelled at by the mods or other members, this would be a much more harmonious place to be.

    I've never gotten the reason behind fights between members. Honestly, what is the damn point? If it gets to the stage where you just can't get along with another member for whatever reason, just don't quote them in posts and address them only when you have to in forum discussions, in a professional manner. It isn't hard.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,830
    Shall I leave forever then?
    Please don't. I personally get a lot of value from you being here. To quote Kirk we're stronger WITH you than WITHOUT you. All families have their fights. Don't take this internet stuff so personally, even when some members intend it as such. We're here to play, and sometimes the play is a bit rough. It's all good, all the time, if you let it be.
    Leave and you will damage my calm....
    #-o
  • We're not starting this dramatic garbage again. We've lost so many members lately over such infami ntile rubbish, and no more shall take such a route out of here. I've blocked the exit of the MI6 forums, in what I hope is a convincing enough symbolic gesture to keep everyones' feet well planted.

    If we worry about what one person says/thinks about us, and that opinion drives us to leave, we've begun to lose the plot. The spats between members is getting old, and if people aired grievances in a mature and professional manner instead of pointing fingers like a child and whining like one after they got yelled at by the mods or other members, this would be a much more harmonious place to be.

    I've never gotten the reason behind fights between members. Honestly, what is the damn point? If it gets to the stage where you just can't get along with another member for whatever reason, just don't quote them in posts and address them only when you have to in forum discussions, in a professional manner. It isn't hard.

    I'm actually.......crying at the moment. And it's not because of you. But it's because of the notion that there are people in here who think the forum is better off with someone being absent here permanently.

    Please don't call this 'amateurish drama'. It's just a fact in this society. Not everyone blends in perfectly. Sometimes with very sad end results. But that's nature. My presence is 'overpowering' to some, and even unwanted by some. I also know how the board of moderators think of me.....

    So it's better to realize that. I'm also tired of myself to be honest. Very very tired. So here you go. Another reason to leave. Don't feel bad about it.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,830
    Another reason to leave.
    Okay, I didn't want to do this, but here it is.
    You are forbidden to leave.
    Sorry. That's final.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,011
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Another reason to leave.
    Okay, I didn't want to do this, but here it is.
    You are forbidden to leave.
    Sorry. That's final.

    I give this a mod's stamp of approval. You leaving is against the rules.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Mine as well. Nobody wants to see you leave GG. We need your constant optimistic attitude on these boards, especially in the midst of all the buzz killer, pessimistic a**holes who shall remain nameless.
  • edited December 2015 Posts: 45
    I like your post, Goldeneye007. I just strongly disagree with two things: PTS in SF was very good and the train scene (ok, the train fight; the rest not so much) in SP is amazing.

    Thanks! and yea I figured most would disagree on the train scene. Everyone I know says the fight was awesome. I just personally am not a huge fan of fist fights in films. This just seemed like two dudes going at it on a train, while destroying everything in their path. The SF fist fight however (at the end of the Shanghai "Jellyfish" scene) was amazing to me. All done in one long shot and very well choreographed, against the dark shadowy backdrop of the night, and didn't go on for too long.

    The PTS in SF wasn't bad per se, certainly better than QoS' PTS, but just didn't have anything amazing to me. Chasing on a bike, the CAT on the train, fist fight on the train. Nothing too stand out to me, although the part where he drives the bike into the wall and flips over onto the train was hilarious.
  • Posts: 11,425
    I thought the QOS PTS was rather good. One of the best car chases in the series.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,830
    Getafix wrote: »
    I thought the QOS PTS was rather good. One of the best car chases in the series.
    Once one gets used to to the editing, it's really awesome!
  • Posts: 45
    chrisisall wrote: »
    Getafix wrote: »
    I thought the QOS PTS was rather good. One of the best car chases in the series.
    Once one gets used to to the editing, it's really awesome!

    Yea, the editing is what gets me. It's so fast, and mixed with a bit of that shaky cam, I actually have to look away from the screen every time I watch it.
  • Posts: 11,425
    The editing definitely causes issues once they reach the safe house (what on earth is going on - I still can't fathom it), but the car chase is very well done IMO.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    I think it's one of the greatest chases put to film. The money shot for me is below. Don't mess with Bond:

    quantum-of-solace-98.png
  • Posts: 11,425
    I'm inclined to agree. It's very hard to make a car chase fresh and in QoS I think they managed to do just that.

    Love the opening shot over the lake as well and Arnold's score.

    Dammit, the whole opening is actually excellent. Far better than SF.
Sign In or Register to comment.