SPECTRE: It grossed $880 Million Worldwide (..and 2015 was the biggest box office year so far)

15051535556152

Comments

  • Posts: 1,314
    The reviews tis far from across the pond seem
  • I was thinking in a 230 million box office in North America. 400 million??? No way!!!
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    If SP makes $400 million in the US, I'll buy a hat, smother it in **** and eat it.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited November 2015 Posts: 8,399
    My SPECTRE BO prediction for the US is 300/350M :)
  • Posts: 12,526
    Spectre performing well across all areas of release as far as i am aware?
  • edited November 2015 Posts: 725
    doubleoego wrote: »
    If SP makes $400 million in the US, I'll buy a hat, smother it in **** and eat it.

    Agreed. @bondjames is right about a narrative forming among US critics, and it looks like it will be negative. Not a good thing because the US press has become so lazy it will just copy anything they can pick up quickly and love to pile on with negative stuff. Funny how the critics loved the other spy films this year that all copy Bond, but they criticize Bond for using its own tropes. I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff. Also how do you stay creative and original with a franchise of 24 films, that is also getting constantly copied.

    I think the low RT score can hurt the US BO. The press will feed on it. SP may be lucky to go much over $200m but I am hoping the rest of the world will make up the difference. The US and German BO weekend figures will be telling but there is still the more important issue of how good SP's legs will be. I don't share the view that BO doesn't matter. I think it matters a lot when EON is just now going into negotiations for a new studio distributor. It's all about leverage.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited November 2015 Posts: 4,116
    smitty wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    If SP makes $400 million in the US, I'll buy a hat, smother it in **** and eat it.

    Agreed. @bondjames is right about a narrative forming among US critics, and it looks like it will be negative. Not a good thing because the US press has become so lazy it will just copy anything they can pick up quickly and love to pile on with negative stuff. Funny how the critics loved the other spy films this year that all copy Bond, but they criticize Bond for using its own tropes. I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff. Also how do you stay creative and original with a franchise of 24 films, that is also getting constantly copied.

    I think the low RT score can hurt the US BO. The press will feed on it. SP may be lucky to go much over $200m but I am hoping the rest of the world will make up the difference. The US and German BO weekend figures will be telling but there is still the more important issue of how good SP's legs will be. I don't share the view that BO doesn't matter. I think it matters a lot when EON is just now going into negotiations for a new studio distributor. It's all about leverage.

    Exactly my fear and prediction. This is one time that I think a film is far better than reviewed or at least considerably more enjoyable.

    Anxious to see the audience reaction and word of mouth. If it mirrors the US critics then yes SP and Bond will have a significant set back in the US. We will be back in back to the drawing board mode.

    Plus Bond has to be viable to Sony or a new distributor.

    We don't the US market to view Bond as retread and washed up especially after all the Craig era and earlier Brosnan films did to bring Bond back from near death.

    And I don't want the other Bond incarnations ...the novels and more importantly the new comic to suffer either thanks to the SP reception.

    Bond as a multiple million business can't run like the SP one did.

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    smitty wrote: »
    [I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff.

    And fans, sadly.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,976
    RC7 wrote: »
    smitty wrote: »
    [I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff.

    And fans, sadly.

    Sadly, this is true. (And I'm an American.)
  • Posts: 1,314
    To be honest though, a lot of the criticism i agree with. Its hard to get about something we've all seen before. Especially on the heels of the 3 proviso Craig films which felt so different.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    smitty wrote: »
    [I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff.

    And fans, sadly.

    Sadly, this is true. (And I'm an American.)

    Yup ...and that's also why it bothered me when MI was so well reviewed and received thanks in large part to those reviews and word of mouth.

    I am sure I am going to enjoy SP more or just as much as MI (I'm way more partial to Bond.), but that critical performance is going to be mud in Bond's eye.


  • Posts: 725
    Well, here is a very good article that clears away the nasty tone of the Forbes attack a bit.

    http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a38546/daniel-craig-best-james-bond/
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited November 2015 Posts: 23,883
    MI-RN was a great film imho. One of the year's best. I think it entirely deserved its positive reviews. It followed a well reviewed & highly successful prior entry as well (like SP follows SF).

    The question is whether SP is being unfairly bashed. I think it is because 65% seems too low. I'll know for sure (personally) this Friday.

    The key also is whether this negativity affects weeks 2 and 3 holding power at the US box office. I think it might marginally, but regardless, I also think that we have a $950M or so global box office winner here. There is too much pent up demand for Bond after SF.
  • Posts: 1,314
    Maybe it's fatigue. The hobbit although far from great is nowhere near as bad as its rt rating. I just think that people were less bothered about retreading Middle earth again. I think if you consider 3/5 is 60% then around 70% is probably accurate for the film.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    bondjames wrote: »
    MI-RN was a great film imho. One of the year's best. I think it entirely deserved its positive reviews. It followed a well reviewed & highly successful prior entry as well (like SP follows SF).

    The question is whether SP is being unfairly bashed. I think it is because 65% seems too low. I'll know for sure (personally) this Friday.

    I think they've done a decent job with M:I, which I thought might bottom out after III, but SP is on another level for me. Although in fairness to RN I actually feel it's hard to make a direct comparison because they both strive for and achieve different things. It's essentially a truly US vehicle vs. a truly British institution and I'm a patriot. We bring the class (winks).
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited November 2015 Posts: 23,883
    RC7 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    MI-RN was a great film imho. One of the year's best. I think it entirely deserved its positive reviews. It followed a well reviewed & highly successful prior entry as well (like SP follows SF).

    The question is whether SP is being unfairly bashed. I think it is because 65% seems too low. I'll know for sure (personally) this Friday.

    I think they've done a decent job with M:I, which I thought might bottom out after III, but SP is on another level for me. Although in fairness to RN I actually feel it's hard to make a direct comparison because they both strive for and achieve different things. It's essentially a truly US vehicle vs. a truly British institution and I'm a patriot. We bring the class (winks).

    And this could very well be the issue imho. US patriotism.

    Bond has trounced MI twice now (MI3 was decimated by CR in the same yr and the superb Mi4-GP was also beaten soundly by SF the next yr). Furthermore, SF thrashed the highly touted TDRK globally (almost unheard of). Perhaps there is a subconscious revenge element.....? ;)
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited November 2015 Posts: 4,116
    RC7 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    MI-RN was a great film imho. One of the year's best. I think it entirely deserved its positive reviews. It followed a well reviewed & highly successful prior entry as well (like SP follows SF).

    The question is whether SP is being unfairly bashed. I think it is because 65% seems too low. I'll know for sure (personally) this Friday.

    I think they've done a decent job with M:I, which I thought might bottom out after III, but SP is on another level for me. Although in fairness to RN I actually feel it's hard to make a direct comparison because they both strive for and achieve different things. It's essentially a truly US vehicle vs. a truly British institution and I'm a patriot. We bring the class (winks).

    I enjoyed MI and it was very good. Probably better written than SP I'm sure, BUT I'm as an experience I'm going to enjoy SP considerably more. Nothing will compare.



  • MyNameIsMyBondRnMyNameIsMyBondRn WhereYouLeastExpectMeToBe
    Posts: 221
    ..The World is Turning it's Page and SP is filling in the Blanks..!- and The Score is Set- .
  • edited November 2015 Posts: 1,098
    Latest news Stateside on the upcoming release of SP.

    Spectre is to have a wide release on Friday of at least 3,927 theatre's.

    the film is also going to be having previews on Thursday at 3,000+ locations from 7pm onwards.

    Interestingly, Sony have lowered their BO forecast for SP on opening weekend to $70-75 mil........but other industry experts, truly do not believe this will be the case.

    Well, our American members here, better go and book their tickets for this weekend! :)
  • smitty wrote: »
    doubleoego wrote: »
    If SP makes $400 million in the US, I'll buy a hat, smother it in **** and eat it.

    Agreed. @bondjames is right about a narrative forming among US critics, and it looks like it will be negative. Not a good thing because the US press has become so lazy it will just copy anything they can pick up quickly and love to pile on with negative stuff. Funny how the critics loved the other spy films this year that all copy Bond, but they criticize Bond for using its own tropes. I also always thought the negative stuff about the script in the leaks would get exploited by US critics which love to look like they know inside stuff. Also how do you stay creative and original with a franchise of 24 films, that is also getting constantly copied.

    Very good point. Mission Impossible, Kingsman, and Spy all blatantly used the Bond formula and references, sometimes even to promote and market themselves, and all got positive critical notices. Now Bond uses its own formula and its being held to a higher standard for some reason. Maybe there's an attitude that Bond is seen as the leader of the pack so it should be pushing forward rather than resting on its laurels.

    Another thing I find interesting are the constant "Waah, its not Skyfall 2!" references in the negative reviews. Now Mission Impossible (which I did enjoy) BLATANTLY copied Skyfall and thus, for a lot of critics, did deliver the Skyfall 2 experience.
    I think the low RT score can hurt the US BO. The press will feed on it. SP may be lucky to go much over $200m but I am hoping the rest of the world will make up the difference. The US and German BO weekend figures will be telling but there is still the more important issue of how good SP's legs will be. I don't share the view that BO doesn't matter. I think it matters a lot when EON is just now going into negotiations for a new studio distributor. It's all about leverage.

    The critical score won't matter at all. The most popular film of the year had 71% on RT. The billion grossing Minions has 54% (Can you imagine kids wanting to go to Minions and their parents saying no, sorry, it only has a 54% tomatometer score, we can't possibly go to that :)) ) 50 Shades of grey had 24% and yet had an 85 million opening weekend. Reviews never, ever stop people from seeing what they want to see, ever. The only impact critics have these days are bringing attention and creating buzz for smaller indie movies or for the annual Oscars circle jerk.

    Bond is a very big "silent majority" event. What I mean by that is that there are huge numbers of people who see Bond movies who aren't on the internet, didn't pay attention to leaks, don't read reviews, but will all be there every time.
  • Posts: 1,098
    One big plus point for Bond...........is that the franchise has a huge fan base worldwide, and even in North America, where the fans will go to see the film anyway, to see what its like for themselves.
    US critics do seem to have an agenda though at times, and this was blatantly shown this summer, when they nearly destroyed the US boxoffice for the the Terminator franchise in their homeland.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    I'm really not an expert on this, will the bad reviews in the US hurt the BO?
    I've heard of movies that were short of buried by critics. This worries me quite a bit.
  • To me I wasn't bothered by the formula, just the odd bit of bad scripting & unnecessary nostalgia, still solid 8/10, again I think it will do well but not in the same vain as SF did.

    FYI I was told by a local cinema manager that the distributors are taking up to 80% of the box office on the back of the success of SF. How the hell can cinemas keep going on that kind of return, with SF they took only 60% because QoS didn't do so well, the problem I foresee is that the cinemas won't keep SP on for as many weeks as they did SF thus the box office will be a lot less than SF.

    So please encorage your friends to go see it and support local cinemas, they need it.
  • Posts: 6,396
    Pirates of The Caribbean and Transformers comes to mind. Those films were crucified by critics and yet it didn't harm them at the box office.

    Here's a segment from Kermode's "Hatchet Job" in which he gives his reasons why critics don't have much bearing on how a film performs:

    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=marfAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=mark+kermode+critics+don't+harm+box+office&source=bl&ots=ymQWz7CpBb&sig=xymtNtlJU227RYbVA2H4ZQvT4Kw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE4Q6AEwB2oVChMIpM_G2JT1yAIVi10aCh0n1gsB#v=onepage&q=mark kermode critics don't harm box office&f=false
  • edited November 2015 Posts: 11,119
    mepal1 wrote: »
    Latest news Stateside on the upcoming release of SP.

    Spectre is to have a wide release on Friday of at least 3,927 theatre's.

    the film is also going to be having previews on Thursday at 3,000+ locations from 7pm onwards.

    Interestingly, Sony have lowered their BO forecast for SP on opening weekend to $70-75 mil........but other industry experts, truly do not believe this will be the case.

    Well, our American members here, better go and book their tickets for this weekend! :)

    Told ya :-). This final theater count seems more like it. Almost 4,000 :-)!

    Regarding the 'prediction' from Sony......they are, like other movie companies, always way more conservative with their predictions when it concerns their own productions :-). Interestingly though, Sony have actually raised their opening weekend predictions as compared to last week. BoxOffice.com was then mentioning $60 Million to $65 Million...from the 'mouths of Sony'.

    PS @Mepal1: Please provide us with sources, weblinks. :-)
  • Posts: 1,098
    To me I wasn't bothered by the formula, just the odd bit of bad scripting & unnecessary nostalgia, still solid 8/10, again I think it will do well but not in the same vain as SF did.

    FYI I was told by a local cinema manager that the distributors are taking up to 80% of the box office on the back of the success of SF. How the hell can cinemas keep going on that kind of return, with SF they took only 60% because QoS didn't do so well, the problem I foresee is that the cinemas won't keep SP on for as many weeks as they did SF thus the box office will be a lot less than SF.

    So please encorage your friends to go see it and support local cinemas, they need it.

    Are you sure?......i always thought in the US it was around 50% on opening weekend, then percentage would change in following weeks, due to how the film was doing!.....80% is well out of order.........film would need to do massive business, to make any real money back.
  • To me I wasn't bothered by the formula, just the odd bit of bad scripting & unnecessary nostalgia, still solid 8/10, again I think it will do well but not in the same vain as SF did.

    FYI I was told by a local cinema manager that the distributors are taking up to 80% of the box office on the back of the success of SF. How the hell can cinemas keep going on that kind of return, with SF they took only 60% because QoS didn't do so well, the problem I foresee is that the cinemas won't keep SP on for as many weeks as they did SF thus the box office will be a lot less than SF.

    So please encorage your friends to go see it and support local cinemas, they need it.

    I assume that 80% deal is only for the UK? where the film was always going to be massive. And since it has done record breaking box office, everybody wins. With a near 3 hour sit time (including ads & trailers), it means a lot of popcorn and drinks get sold, and that's where the real money is for cinemas!
  • mepal1 wrote: »
    To me I wasn't bothered by the formula, just the odd bit of bad scripting & unnecessary nostalgia, still solid 8/10, again I think it will do well but not in the same vain as SF did.

    FYI I was told by a local cinema manager that the distributors are taking up to 80% of the box office on the back of the success of SF. How the hell can cinemas keep going on that kind of return, with SF they took only 60% because QoS didn't do so well, the problem I foresee is that the cinemas won't keep SP on for as many weeks as they did SF thus the box office will be a lot less than SF.

    So please encorage your friends to go see it and support local cinemas, they need it.

    Are you sure?......i always thought in the US it was around 50% on opening weekend, then percentage would change in following weeks, due to how the film was doing!.....80% is well out of order.........film would need to do massive business, to make any real money back.

    Don't know about the US but that's what I was told about in the UK, my local cinema was told they had to show it 3 times a day minimum as well which is their total capacity as they only have one screen, small independents are really being treated badly if this is the case everywhere.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited November 2015 Posts: 23,883
    I'm really not an expert on this, will the bad reviews in the US hurt the BO?
    I've heard of movies that were short of buried by critics. This worries me quite a bit.

    It will hurt the 3rd week definitely. I'm sure of it. 1st and 2nd week are a lock due to the pent up demand post-SF and the fact that there's nothing out there to compete with it at the moment.

    However by week 3 this film has to walk on its own. Of course people like myself and all the other rabid Bond fans will be back by then to see it again, but that's not going to be enough. Negative reviews will, by week 3, possibly impact the casual fan, who may or may not have gone to see it (and who may be influenced by the negative talk).

    SF only fell 13% in weekend 3 box office which was insanely good. SP will probably have a more dramatic 3rd week drop. Having said that, as I mentioned a few pages back, if it makes enough in weeks 1 (I'm still betting it's $100m despite poor reviews) and week 2 (as long as it's a less than 55% drop) we should still have a slim shot at beating SF's US gross or possibly coming close to it (around $290m) due to ticket prices, IMAX and other factors.

    Word of mouth and reviews do have a psychological effect. If a film is reviewed very positively, then people want to see it know what all the fuss is about (think 6th Sense or TDK or SF for example). If it's average to poor reviews there is less incentive on the margin. I remember lots of people who weren't Bond fans starting up conversations about SF in 2012. A lot were doing that about CR in 2006 as well, And Bourne in 2001. It became a watercooler thing. I'm sure the same occurred with JW this year.
  • The third week of SF (and SP) is the Thanksgiving holiday in the US. The low drop is because people want to save a Bond movie for when they're with family and friends etc.
Sign In or Register to comment.