›

Bond movie ranking (Simple list, no details)

1…9091939596…241

Comments

  • ToTheRightToTheRight
    Posts: 16,153
    TheWizardOfIce wrote: »
    Jimmy 'card sense' Bond better even than DAD is a stretch but better than QOS, TND, MR, SF and on a par with GE is downright deranged.

    LOL I keep moving it. Tough to place it, but I think I've settle it alongside TMWTGG. Peter Lorre is pretty classic.
  • vzokvzok
    Posts: 4,044
    Birdleson wrote: »
    CR '54 is far from my least favorite Bond film.

    I wonder what a 2 hour live TV performance of Bond could be like today
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    TheWizardOfIce wrote: »
    Jimmy 'card sense' Bond better even than DAD is a stretch but better than QOS, TND, MR, SF and on a par with GE is downright deranged.

    I agree, GE belongs way up to the heights of FRWL GF TLD OHMSS.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,112
    Latest ranking:

    FIVE STARS:
    1. The Living Daylights
    2. From Russia with Love
    3. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    4. Dr. No
    5. Licence to Kill

    FOUR STARS:
    6. Goldfinger
    7. Thunderball
    8. GoldenEye
    9. Casino Royale
    10. Skyfall

    THREE STARS:
    11. The Spy Who Loved Me
    12. The Man with the Golden Gun
    13. The World Is Not Enough
    14. Octopussy
    15. You Only Live Twice

    TWO STARS:
    16. Quantum of Solace
    17. A View to a Kill
    18. Tomorrow Never Dies
    19. Diamonds Are Forever
    20. For Your Eyes Only
    21. Live and Let Die
    22. Spectre
    23. Moonraker

    ONE STAR:
    24. Die Another Day
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    edited April 2016 Posts: 4,116
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    LTK SP and TLD are really bad executed films either in writing and/or production values but yet so many read or perceive so much in those films that just isn't there or there but surrounded by rubbish.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously.
    I disagree concerning TND... it rides that fine line between serious & camp like nearly no other Bond with the possible exception of YOLT.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    chrisisall wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously.
    I disagree concerning TND... it rides that fine line between serious & camp like nearly no other Bond with the possible exception of YOLT.

    I agree with that.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited April 2016 Posts: 9,117

    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    I think you answered your own question.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    TheWizardOfIce wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    I think you answered your own question.

    Yes. They are also poor quality scripts (with too much action) compared to the better films.
  • vzokvzok
    Posts: 4,044
    suavejmf wrote: »
    TheWizardOfIce wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    I think you answered your own question.

    Yes. They are also poor quality scripts (with too much action) compared to the better films.

    At least the action cut down on the talking. Awful dialogue between Bond and Jinx.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    Posts: 7,112
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    LTK SP and TLD are really bad executed films either in writing and/or production values but yet so many read or perceive so much in those films that just isn't there or there but surrounded by rubbish.

    How can you like Ian Fleming and not like Timothy Dalton?

    Anyway, TLD and LTK are far better written than TND or DAD. They present more character development, real relationships and are less straightforward (which is a good thing in my mind).

    An atmospheric Cold War spy thriller and Bond goes Yojimbo are more my idea of a good film than shoot-m-ups as TND or DAD.

  • w2bondw2bond is indeed a very rare breed
    edited April 2016 Posts: 2,252
    Some people like Timothy Dalton but feel the two films he was in don't do him justice - he was jibbed of a definitive portrayal. He was close in TLD but there were many hangovers from the Moore era. A lot of the problems seems to be differences in how Glen and Dalton saw the character, and perhaps no-one was quite 100% committed to the change in tone (apart from Dalton)
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Dalton's films are still the best 007 flicks of the 80's hands down me though.
  • Mathis1Mathis1
    Posts: 7,415
    My list now including Never Say Never Again.

    1) OHMSS
    2) TLD
    3) CR
    4) LTK
    5) GF
    6) FRWL
    7) SP
    8) OP
    9) QOS
    10) FYEO
    11) LALD
    12) TB
    13) TMWTGG
    14) SF
    15) YOLT
    16) MR
    17) AVTAK
    18) TSWLM
    19) DN
    20) DAF
    21) TWINE
    22) GE
    23) TND
    24) NSNA
    25) DAD

    I disagree totally that TLD,SP and LTK are inferior to TND and DAD!
    TLD is pure Fleming, and LTK is well constructed Bond thriller, with also elements of Fleming. SP has come in for a lot of criticism, but its streets ahead of DAD and TND which are tedious, empty 2 hours which substitute long boring action scenes and bad puns for good story and strong characterisation!
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    10 out of 11 the same movies in our Top 11's @Mathis1
    How great is that!
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    BondJasonBond006 wrote: »
    10 out of 11 the same movies in our Top 11's @Mathis1
    How great is that!

    And how about the bottom?
  • Mathis1Mathis1
    Posts: 7,415
    Nice one! Which one do we differ on?
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Nice one! Which one do we differ on?

    QOS - GE
    but QOS is not far away at No 13 :)
  • Oddjobs_hatOddjobs_hat
    edited April 2016 Posts: 79
    sorry leaned on the keyboard
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    Mathis1 wrote: »

    I disagree totally that TLD,SP and LTK are inferior to TND and DAD!
    TLD is pure Fleming, and LTK is well constructed Bond thriller, with also elements of Fleming. SP has come in for a lot of criticism, but its streets ahead of DAD and TND which are tedious, empty 2 hours which substitute long boring action scenes and bad puns for good story and strong characterisation!

    And I totally agree with you my good man.
  • tanaka123tanaka123
    Posts: 4,325
    Best Bond film ever created- Casino Royale

    Best Bond film over two hours ever created- Casino Royale

    Worst Bond film ever created- Die Another Day

    Most overrated Bond film ever created- Goldfinger

    Most underrated Bond film ever created- Quantum of Solace

    Most uneven Bond film ever created- Die Another Day

    Most funny Bond film ever created- Spectre

    Least funny Bond film ever created- Quantum of Solace
  • FoxRoxFoxRox
    Posts: 12,466
    My take on that:

    Best Bond film ever created: Casino Royale
    Best Bond film over two hours ever created: Casino Royale
    Worst Bond film ever created: Moonraker
    Most overrated Bond film ever created: From Russia with Love
    Most underrated Bond film ever created: Quantum of Solace
    Most uneven Bond film ever created: Die Another Day
    Most funny Bond film ever created: Live and Let Die
    Least funny Bond film ever created: Quantum of Solace
  • stun_harvestingstun_harvesting
    Posts: 337
    Controversy is heading your way, people.

    Best Bond film ever created: The Spy Who Loved Me
    Best Bond film over two hours ever created: The Spy Who Loved Me
    Worst Bond film ever created: Licence to Kill
    Most overrated Bond film ever created: Licence to Kill or For Your Eyes Only
    Most underrated Bond film ever created: A View To A Kill
    Most uneven Bond film ever created: Licence to Kill or Die Another Day
    Most funny Bond film ever created: This one's a tie between a lot, I can't decide
    Least funny Bond film ever created: Quantum of Solace
  • stun_harvestingstun_harvesting
    Posts: 337
    Eh. I was expecting the mention of Licence to Kill, A View To A Kill and perhaps For Your Eyes Only in their respective placements to be controversial.
  • stun_harvestingstun_harvesting
    Posts: 337
    @Birdleson - Well, I have a friend who ought to be a bit more controversial.

    He has Brosnan's last three as #22, #23 and #24, and GE is only #17 for him.
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Die Another Day if you can tolerate Berry and bad CGI and TND are just straightforward Bond flicks not to be taken seriously. I really don't understand why consistently so low.

    LTK SP and TLD are really bad executed films either in writing and/or production values but yet so many read or perceive so much in those films that just isn't there or there but surrounded by rubbish.

    How can you like Ian Fleming and not like Timothy Dalton?

    Anyway, TLD and LTK are far better written than TND or DAD. They present more character development, real relationships and are less straightforward (which is a good thing in my mind).

    An atmospheric Cold War spy thriller and Bond goes Yojimbo are more my idea of a good film than shoot-m-ups as TND or DAD.

    I like Dalton ...just not John Glen.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    stun_harvesting wrote: »
    Worst Bond film ever created: Licence to Kill
    Flagged for trolling.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    Birdleson wrote: »
    stun_harvesting wrote: »
    @Birdleson - Well, I have a friend who ought to be a bit more controversial.

    He has Brosnan's last three as #22, #23 and #24, and GE is only #17 for him.

    We've had people who put all Brosnan, and all Craig, dead last.
    The same people would vote for Trump, eh? Silly knows no bounds....
    :))
  • stun_harvestingstun_harvesting
    edited April 2016 Posts: 337
    Birdleson wrote: »

    We've had people who put all Brosnan, and all Craig, dead last.

    Have you had someone put all Connery last? I know people who think all of Connery's films sucked, except DAF.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 17,789
    stun_harvesting wrote: »
    Birdleson wrote: »

    We've had people who put all Brosnan, and all Craig, dead last.

    Have you had someone put all Connery last? I know people who think all of Connery's films sucked, except DAF.
    Proves my point.
    =))
Sign In or Register to comment.