Last Bond Movie You Watched

1189190192194195332

Comments

  • Major_BoothroydMajor_Boothroyd Republic of Isthmus
    Posts: 2,722
    Just finished watching From Russia With Love an hour ago. Am going through the bond films chronologically with my girlfriend. her choice on how to view them was in sequence - which makes sense whereas I've spent far too long on this forum discussing mad combinations and mini-marathons of bond connected with the most tenuous of themes. So watching them in sequence was actually far from my suggestions - but also the most sensible!
    From Russia is my favourite bond film - and will be forever. As close as one can get to objectivity - I think that Casino Royale might actually be the best bond film - narratively, emotionally and visually compelling. But From Russia lives in my heart. Adore that film. Interestingly my girlfriend preferred Dr No overall. But there was plenty she liked about FRWL (although some of the sexism is a bit cringe inducing when you're introducing bond films - not looking forward to GF and TB on that front!) I have seen FRWL more than any Bond film. Could watch it every day.

    I love watching these on blu ray. They look a million bucks. My girlfriend was impressed with the look of it. Her favourite bond before we watched any of them was Sean Connery - and she likes the 60s style and look. The music is really lush - but she remarked that they lay on the Bond theme thick in FRWL particularly - even more than Dr No sometimes! She enjoyed Kerim Bey, Kronsteen and Rosa Klebb the most as characters so far. But preferred Honey Ryder to Tatiana who she found naive.

    So GF is next - maybe on the weekend might watch that on a lazy Sunday.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    edited August 2016 Posts: 3,985
    TLD

    Has stood the test of time very well. Better than any of the Brosnan films.

    Really good plot that has Bond actually having to do some detective work and was the first film since the 60's to have a faithful portrayal of Fleming's character.

    Dalton is really excellent in this. His performance is full of nice little moments ( Love the look he gives when he leaves the safehouse, you just know he doesn't believe Koskov's story) and his scenes with Kara are really memorable.

    Add the wonderful Barry score and some great suspenseful action and you've got one of my favourite Bond films.
  • Posts: 7,393
    Dalton was great at those little moments. Said it before but watch him react to an insipid cup of coffee in the cafe scene with Saunders!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 3,985
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Dalton was great at those little moments. Said it before but watch him react to an insipid cup of coffee in the cafe scene with Saunders!

    I love the exasperated look he gives when he's trying to tell Kara to drive into the rear of the plane! Gold!
  • edited August 2016 Posts: 16,134
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Dalton was great at those little moments. Said it before but watch him react to an insipid cup of coffee in the cafe scene with Saunders!

    I've always liked that moment. Fleming's Bond was particular in his taste in coffee . Tim was great at those subtle reactions. I can picture that coffee being very nasty as well.

  • edited August 2016 Posts: 12,447
    Just popped in On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969). Was going to save it for Christmas, but what the heck - I'll watch it twice before the year is out probably. Second only to CR in my ranking.
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,374
    In honour of Sir Sean's B-day I watched DAF! I must say it never fails to entertain me. Yes the effects are cheesy (especially the glowing Russian sub) the plot is a little out there. BUT Sean was back in fine form (IMHO), Jill St. John was perfectly cast as Tiffany Case. (sexier then I remembered her!) Nice score by Barry! A guilty pleasure that seems to always entertain me.
  • Major_BoothroydMajor_Boothroyd Republic of Isthmus
    Posts: 2,722
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Just popped in On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969). Was going to save it for Christmas, but what the heck - I'll watch it twice before the year is out probably. Second only to CR in my ranking.

    I watched this a couple of months ago in Italian (I was in Italy!) and the dubbing was first class. All four leads sounded spot on. Especially Bond and Blofeld. First time I'd ever watched a full Bond film in another language.
  • edited August 2016 Posts: 19,339
    OK..i have NEVER done this before and i love LTK but not TLD as a lot of the 'originals' on here know....i am SERIOUSLY considering a Dalton double bill...yes ,me...shall i or shall i not ?!

    Will it enhance my bank holiday or kill it dead ?!!
  • Posts: 11,119
    I yesterday rewatched "Skyfall" and "SPECTRE". I have to say that I flt a bit more 'warm' when watching "SPECTRE". It was slightly more globetrotting adventure, it had slightly more of the ridiculousness of the 1960's and 1970's Bond films (especially the scenes at Blofeld's lair, very reminiscent of "Doctor No", and the 'Scaramanga fun house' esque scenes in the London finale). It was slightly funnier, aided by whacky circumstances, it finally had an eerie S.P.E.C.T.R.E.-meeting, reminiscent of "Thunderball".

    I....I AM IN DOUBT GUYS :-S
  • Posts: 19,339
    Well if it feels like TB ,GG, then you know which film u prefer,its Sp.

    As my former post,i am doing a Dalton Double Bill,one of my fave films and one not,never done before,so i know how you feel haha !!
  • edited August 2016 Posts: 19,339
    Moved to a new thread.
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.

  • Posts: 19,339
    Szonana wrote: »
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.

    He wont be Szonana he wont be...try my first ever Dalton double im doing...!!

  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    Posts: 1,130
    barryt007 wrote: »
    Szonana wrote: »
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.

    He wont be Szonana he wont be...try my first ever Dalton double im doing...!!


    I will and i hope Brosnan fans won't dissapear from this forum but your appreciation thread for Tomorrow never dies gave me hope and its cool this stigma of Craig fans hating Pierce and viceversa doesn't exist anymore.



  • Posts: 19,339
    Watch one ,and comment 'while you watch' on my new thread peeps !!...TLD is rising in my list and it helps to comment to everyone about things u feel and see...
  • Posts: 19,339
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I will do that next Bond-A-Thon. With my current one I am counting the animals in the films (see other thread), while also texting @Creasy47 simultaneously. Can't handle another aspect. It is an appealing idea, though, live posting. Someone else did to a few years back. Can't remember who.

    That is really commendable...i couldnt believe i was watching the same bird in TLD that was in FYEO...they really are a companion for life...a nice touch..

  • Posts: 9,842
    Well I asked my wife to a pick a bond film for me to watch while I do laundry and she picked Goldeneye so I figure I will do my review now as I am not going to get back on track with For Your Eyes Only on the 10th which I realize I may not get to the Craig era in "proper time" which means I may double up ANYWAYS

    Goldeneye is good, not great but good. lets talk positives the action is great Brosnan puts in a solid performance and Eric Sierra's score is actually quite nice. The locations are fantastic and the villains are good.

    the bad well the acting and film feel over the top in places. Again not a horrible film but it just is well ok and compared to Campbell's second film there is no comparison. Like I said it checks the boxes and does it well but outstanding it is not.

    You
    1. Quantum of Solace
    2. From Russia with love
    3. On her Majesties Secret Service
    4. Live and let die
    5. Goldeneye
    6. Spectre
    7. Dr. No
    8. Thunderball
    9. The Spy Who Loved Me
    10. Goldfinger
    11. You only live twice
    12. The man with the golden gun
    13. Diamonds are forever
    14. Moonraker
    15. Casino Royale 1954
    16. Casino Royale 1967







  • Posts: 11,119
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I for one appreciate the Brosnan films far more than I used to. In the '90s I decided that this wasn't my Bond anymore and essentially gave up, not even bothering to see TND in the theatre (first one that I missed since OHMSS).

    It's probably because SP left me so cold and empty: the Brosnan films seem joyous and full of life in comparison.

    Well, @Birdleson, that's not how most voters in the Big Bond Poll think about it :-)
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited August 2016 Posts: 23,883
    Szonana wrote: »
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.
    I hope Brosnan fans don't become extinct, and I doubt it will happen, so rest assured.

    I'm afraid Brosnan in TND doesn't remind me of Connery in YOLT, although there is a similarity to the stories (and to TSWLM). He reminds me of Brosnan.

    You raise an interesting point however. I have contended that SP reminds me very much of TND, and both films made me sour (to a degree) on the respective actors. I've often wondered why, and have speculated previously that it was because both the films were too predictable. However, having read your post I now believe it's because both films have scenes that are very similar to previous scenes in other films, and so a direct comparison of the respective actors to their illustrious predecessors took place in my mind readily while watching both. In both cases, the current actors came up woefully short (for me) in comparison.

    So, I think from my perspective, I would prefer future actors not be put in this position, but rather, be in more original situations and premises, like Brosnan was in GE, and like Craig was in his first three.
  • Posts: 19,339
    TLD ....still boring ....another 2 hours lost trying to like it...nope...thats it ,done...bottom of the pile ,yes even below DAD .
  • SzonanaSzonana Mexico
    edited August 2016 Posts: 1,130
    bondjames wrote: »
    Szonana wrote: »
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.
    I hope Brosnan fans don't become extinct, and I doubt it will happen, so rest assured.

    I'm afraid Brosnan in TND doesn't remind me of Connery in YOLT, although there is a similarity to the stories (and to TSWLM). He reminds me of Brosnan.

    You raise an interesting point however. I have contended that SP reminds me very much of TND, and both films made me sour (to a degree) on the respective actors. I've often wondered why, and have speculated previously that it was because both the films were too predictable. However, having read your post I now believe it's because both films have scenes that are very similar to previous scenes in other films, and so a direct comparison of the respective actors to their illustrious predecessors took place in my mind readily while watching both. In both cases, the current actors came up woefully short (for me) in comparison.

    So, I think from my perspective, I would prefer future actors not be put in this position, but rather, be in more original situations and premises, like Brosnan was in GE, and like Craig was in his first three.


    Well more than Pierce Being similar to Connery in that exact same film( You only live Twice) pierce's smile and the way he conquers the ladies remind me to Sean.

    especially in Tomorrow never dies The love scene with Paris the way he takes of her dress it's quite similar to the love scene with Helga in You only live twice. Hehe funny i first didn't mean the comparisons in those two films but my example ended up comparing those films( Tomorrow never dies and you only live twice)

    For me Pierce is always a constant reminder to Sean but a little more gentle and adapted to the 90s.

    anyway another similarity is how is their confrontation with Elektra and Tatiana when Bond thought thier respetive ladies were traitors.

    Look how they do change from sweet and gentle to completely agresive and serious when it comes to ask them what they know or aksing them to tell the truth the only difference is that Tatiana was telling the truth but Elektra lied big time.

    you also make a great point on how giving a certain actor similar scenes to his predecessors is not such a great idea since it could like bad copies instead of an homage.

    For example some claim Criag looked a bitt rapey in Spectre with Bellucci but this more inssistence approach of seduction was applauded when Sean did it in Goldfinger or the playful spanking in From Russia with love.

    What may work for one actor doesn't work for the other.



  • Posts: 16,134
    bondjames wrote: »
    Szonana wrote: »
    YOLT and TND.

    2 thrilling adventures where Bond most stop WW3 before it starts. YOLT is as big as they come, the soundtrack is fantastic, the sets are off the charts, the locations are gorgeous. The first hour totally flies by, so much stuff happening. The pace dies down a bit in the 2nd half, but it is always a pleasure watching Connery not giving any damns about bullsh*t happening around him. The climax is spectacular, people from both sides flying around with explosions all over the place.

    As for TND, one of my favorites. Brosnan is a pure badass here, he brings a huge level of destruction everywhere he goes, while not forgetting to have fun and wise crack jokes. The soundtrack is awesome, with the Bond theme played full blast almost every 5 minutes. The pace of the film is tremendous, not more than 8 minutes of 'calm' between each action scenes. Jonathan Pryce is a joy to see, chewing the scenery and hamming it up at every chance he gets.


    Very nice double feature the similar story made in in different times and my two favorite Bond actors.
    Didn't Brosnan here reminded you to Connery?

    Anyway it's refreshing reading nice things about Pierce sometimes i feel like Brosnan fans are in danger of extinction hehe.
    I hope Brosnan fans don't become extinct, and I doubt it will happen, so rest assured.

    I'm afraid Brosnan in TND doesn't remind me of Connery in YOLT, although there is a similarity to the stories (and to TSWLM). He reminds me of Brosnan.

    You raise an interesting point however. I have contended that SP reminds me very much of TND, and both films made me sour (to a degree) on the respective actors. I've often wondered why, and have speculated previously that it was because both the films were too predictable. However, having read your post I now believe it's because both films have scenes that are very similar to previous scenes in other films, and so a direct comparison of the respective actors to their illustrious predecessors took place in my mind readily while watching both. In both cases, the current actors came up woefully short (for me) in comparison.

    So, I think from my perspective, I would prefer future actors not be put in this position, but rather, be in more original situations and premises, like Brosnan was in GE, and like Craig was in his first three.

    I distinctly remember, although still liking TND, being disappointed as I left the theatre, feeling other entries: YOLT, TSWLM, MR did this type of formula Bond film so much better. Also being a bit sad realizing at this point, Pierce had done the same number of films as Tim, with the current film being so meh. After LTK I was eagerly awaiting news on which direction Eon and Tim were going to take the series next. By 1997, TND, particularly the Stealth boat sequence, the generic Stamper (which to me made Hans look as iconic as Oddjob) and some of the gadgets, all seemed to feel like a caricature of a James Bond film. Still, I felt Pierce was the ONLY person at that time to play Bond and I'd flatly refuse to consider anyone else (unless Tim were to come back).

    Leading to my most recent Bond viewing-- a far better 2nd outing for a James Bond actor:

    FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

    Watched it the other day in honor of Sean's birthday. Just as great now as it was when I saw it as a kid. I never tire of this one.
  • Posts: 11,189
    barryt007 wrote: »
    TLD ....still boring ....another 2 hours lost trying to like it...nope...thats it ,done...bottom of the pile ,yes even below DAD .

    The Afgahn sequence is a bit slow but overall I think TLD is a solid, classy flick with some great scenes.

    One thing that does annoy me a little at times is Dalton's overly dramatic expressions and movements during the action scenes. I swear he overacts when he jumps that fence just before the mujahedeen ambush them.
  • Posts: 19,339
    @bain123 as a long standing and respected member do you prefer TLD over LTK ?...for eg you had to introduce them to Bond or you had only 1 of the two films to show ?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    If I could chime in, I personally prefer LTK. It's a top 10 film for me (just cracks the top 10). TLD is far lower in my ranking.

    I just tune out after Vienna every time. I used to like it much more before (and actually hated LTK) but as I've gotten older, I've found so much more to like in the later film. It was made for Dalton's style and portrayal, unlike TLD which feels like it could have been written for Moore or Brosnan.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,193
    For me TLD is the last Bond that has a "Classic" Bond feel to it, particularly because of the involvement of the Soviets. LTK is a glimpse at a future that would not be seen again Until CR. They really are too different to compare to one another; it depends what you're in the mood for. If pressed I would say TLD is the better film.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited August 2016 Posts: 23,883
    talos7 wrote: »
    For me TLD is the last Bond that has a "Classic" Bond feel to it, particularly because of the involvement of the Soviets. LTK is a glimpse at a future that would not be seen again Until CR. They really are too different to compare to one another; it depends what you're in the mood for. If pressed I would say TLD is the better film.
    I had never thought about it that way before, but you're right. LTK was certainly ahead of its time with the rogue Bond, increased violence, less fantastical villain etc. etc. It also reminds me of FYEO for some reason (I think it's the lack of big lairs, the yachts, and the more down to earth feel). EDIT: And the revenge element (shared with FYEO, although in that film's case, it's Melina rather than Bond out for it).
  • Posts: 19,339
    LTK was before its time....and it had to fight in '89 :Batman,Lethal Weapon 2 ,Indiana Jones....the timing and promo was crap.

    But the good thing is WE get to appreciate it ,and i still maintain if Tim got a 3rd run at Bond he would have nailed it ,but hey ho.......i have watched both films tonight,my first ever Dalton Bond double,and i wont be doing that again.

    I have have gone from depressed and bored to excited and rooting for my British hero...you know the films...
  • edited August 2016 Posts: 11,189
    @barryt007 As a whole I think TLD is the slightly stronger Bond film, despite it's underwhelming villains. It's got more class: namely the Pushkin interrogation, the scene on the tram, the meeting at the safehouse, the Vienna stuff and the cargo net fight.

    Kill used to be one of my top 5 Bond films but the revenge set-up does feel somewhat forced and cheesy.
Sign In or Register to comment.