Last Bond Movie You Watched

1205206208210211332

Comments

  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Casino Royale

    My 1996-2016 20th Anniversary Bondathon
    1. Spectre
    2. Casino Royale
    3. Skyfall
    4. Quantum Of Solace

    SP over CR?!

    At last someone with taste! Thought I am the only one.

    SP has it's problems (the biggest one being the clumsy Bond:Blofeld connection, which still doesn't sit right with me), but it is the first Craig era film to feel like a Bond film.
    Yep! Yep! Yep!
  • Posts: 7,621
    GOLDFINGER
    First Bond film I saw on Television, its always been a fan and critic favourite, so popped it in the blu-ray to see if it still holds up well! The answer is a definite yes! Lighter in tone to the previous FRWL, with Guy Hamilton taking the reins, its classed as a template for future Bonds. The larger than life villain, his distinctive henchman, a memorable theme and score, big set pieces, the one-liners! And of course, Connery, effortlessly cool, and dominant, his delivery of the witticisms flawless, he's a tremendous lead!
    Not that it doesn't have its faults. I never really liked Honor Blackman, she's not that attractive or sexy, (Shirley Eaton is much sexier, and of course she has THAT death scene!) and the section at Goldfingers base is rather slow (told you all Bond movies have a slow section), the extraction of Mr Solo from the gold after the car crusher (similar sequence was done better in AVTAK, when Zorin drops him from the blimp!) and the big reveal to the consortium, and Bond just sitting in his cell, drags a little!
    The pts is only ok, I always remember the guard, after 007 jumps down on him, waiting for Bond to kick him in the face! (Not as bad, mind you, of the motorcyclist waiting for Bond to kick him off the bike in DAF!!), the fight scene isn't as good as I recall, though the payoff brilliant, and the door slamming seguing into Bassey and Barrys classic theme!
    Gert Frobe was a wonderful Nemesis, the card cheating, the golf match, the laser, he's terrific in all his scenes, and he has a great death scene! Harold Sakatas Oddjob character was equally memorable, and AVTAK missed a trick, by not having MayDay remain loyal to Zorin, like Oddjob does to Goldfinger, when he tries to stop the guy, and Bond, from diffusing the bomb, even though it means his death!
    It doesn't really have an action sequence to rival the train fight from FRWL, but I can imagine people being wowed by the whole film it at the time.
    Top 5 film for me, with FRWL at 6, I could easily swap them round as I enjoy both movies! Going to watch LALD again at the weekend, and its just over a year since the much maligned (on here anyway!) Spectre, so may watch it again, to see if I still enjoy it!
  • Posts: 11,189
    Goldfinger is definitely more comic than DN and FRWL, but it works brilliantly in this case. Those two certainly had humour but it was a little more understated (can't imagine Barry's "cowrrr!" musical cue at Pussy's Pilots in either of those films).
  • pachazopachazo Make Your Choice
    Posts: 7,314
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    AVTAK missed a trick, by not having MayDay remain loyal to Zorin, like Oddjob does to Goldfinger

    A woman scorned... Besides, I love the look on Zorin's face when he sees her pop out of the mine shaft.

    I enjoy the way both films handled the situation. Although, there is no doubt that GF is the superior product, of course.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,454
    pachazo wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    AVTAK missed a trick, by not having MayDay remain loyal to Zorin, like Oddjob does to Goldfinger

    A woman scorned... Besides, I love the look on Zorin's face when he sees her pop out of the mine shaft.

    I enjoy the way both films handled the situation. Although, there is no doubt that GF is the superior product, of course.

    It's admirable to see Oddjob's devotion.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,592
    Birdleson wrote: »
    pachazo wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    AVTAK missed a trick, by not having MayDay remain loyal to Zorin, like Oddjob does to Goldfinger

    A woman scorned... Besides, I love the look on Zorin's face when he sees her pop out of the mine shaft.

    I enjoy the way both films handled the situation. Although, there is no doubt that GF is the superior product, of course.

    Mayday's death is a highlight.
    I love that moment. In fact, the entire third act is superb.
  • Posts: 12,523
    Been in the mood for Skyfall lately. I fondly look back on 4 years ago when I first saw it in the theater; one of my best experiences seeing a movie in the theater. Some find it overrated, but I can't imagine it falling out of favor with me. Absolutely love it.
  • JohnHammond73JohnHammond73 Lancashire, UK
    Posts: 4,151
    Goldfinger, as part of the MI6 Community Bondathon.
  • JohnHammond73JohnHammond73 Lancashire, UK
    Posts: 4,151
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Do t forget the Bond Meter, guys.

    I made sure I entered my viewing yesterday, cheers.

  • Posts: 1,296
    I was going to rescore and edit NSNA and then I was like wait this movie isnt worth the bother
  • Posts: 16,226
    Casino Royale

    My 1996-2016 20th Anniversary Bondathon
    1. Spectre
    2. Casino Royale
    3. Skyfall
    4. Quantum Of Solace

    SP over CR?!

    At last someone with taste! Thought I am the only one.

    SP has it's problems (the biggest one being the clumsy Bond:Blofeld connection, which still doesn't sit right with me), but it is the first Craig era film to feel like a Bond film.

    I liked SP a lot more on my most recent viewing. I actually am feeling it may hold up better than CR in the future. Right now CR seems to me like a mixture of trendy 2006 cell phones, a film piggybacking on the 2006 reboot trend, a wee bit of the Fleming novel, and a ton of extraneous terrorist subplots and airport action scenes- all of which adds to a film that is feeling very little like Bond film. Solid as a thriller, but one I'm lately not popping in or getting all the way thru.
  • Posts: 1,296
    @totheright Casino Royale is a decent Bond film but it was dated 5 years ago, and even moreso now.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,454
    IGUANNA wrote: »
    @totheright Casino Royale is a decent Bond film but it was dated 5 years ago, and even moreso now.

    Yes, I noticed that too, dated horribly.
  • Posts: 7,621
    You guys obviously didn't vote in the 'Best Bond Poll', as CR has just beaten all to the number one spot!
    RE MayDay and her death scene, yes its a great moment and Zorins reaction, all I was saying was that it would have been more suspenseful had MayDay tried to stop Bond from removing the bomb!
  • Posts: 16,226
    IGUANNA wrote: »
    @totheright Casino Royale is a decent Bond film but it was dated 5 years ago, and even moreso now.
    I think when a Bond film is given a specific date :July 6th 2006 as in CR, it dates the film immediately. I prefer the old concept, I believe it was either Cubby's or Mickey G's that Bond should be set a few minutes into the future. Keeps it more timeless.

  • Posts: 1,296
    I almost expect the ticking clock from '24' to show up during the airport scene.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited October 2016 Posts: 8,454
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Is "dated" negative?

    If "timeless" is positive, then yes.
  • Posts: 11,189
    There's dated as in "vintage" and dated as in "corny".
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,084
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I don't want a film not to look of its era. I really haven't like much cinema since the '70s, so I am hesitant to use the term. If putting a date in a film "dates" it, then I sure as hell don't care.

    Exactly. Dates are meaningless in the factor of a film being 'dated'

    2001 was 15 years ago yet the 'futuristic' 2001:A Space Odyssey still looks pretty darn fresh to me as I'm sure it did in 1968.

  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    CR actually begins to suffer from age. Never thought it could happen but it does.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    I liked SP a lot more on my most recent viewing. I actually am feeling it may hold up better than CR in the future. Right now CR seems to me like a mixture of trendy 2006 cell phones, a film piggybacking on the 2006 reboot trend, a wee bit of the Fleming novel, and a ton of extraneous terrorist subplots and airport action scenes- all of which adds to a film that is feeling very little like Bond film. Solid as a thriller, but one I'm lately not popping in or getting all the way thru.

    I feel the same way now.
    I am convinced it'll slip considerably in people's rankings in the next 10 years to a lower Top 10 spot.

    It'll join GE somewhere in the middle.
    But it will remain everyone's favourite of this era.

    Personally I am shocked that it actually might go down in my ranking. For 10 years it was firmly set No 4 after GE TLD and OHMSS, but now I am not sure anymore.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited October 2016 Posts: 8,454
    CR actually begins to suffer from age. Never thought it could happen but it does.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    I liked SP a lot more on my most recent viewing. I actually am feeling it may hold up better than CR in the future. Right now CR seems to me like a mixture of trendy 2006 cell phones, a film piggybacking on the 2006 reboot trend, a wee bit of the Fleming novel, and a ton of extraneous terrorist subplots and airport action scenes- all of which adds to a film that is feeling very little like Bond film. Solid as a thriller, but one I'm lately not popping in or getting all the way thru.

    I feel the same way now.
    I am convinced it'll slip considerably in people's rankings in the next 10 years to a lower Top 10 spot.

    It'll join GE somewhere in the middle.
    But it will remain everyone's favourite of this era.

    Personally I am shocked that it actually might go down in my ranking. For 10 years it was firmly set No 4 after GE TLD and OHMSS, but now I am not sure anymore.

    Yes, CR dropped out of my top 5 too. The further we are from it's release, the more the teenage angst of that film becomes apparent.
  • Posts: 12,523
    Shame CR is falling out of favor with some members here. You could call the cell phones or whatever else "dated", but that never bothers me in a movie. Sure it's great to have a film that's mostly timeless, but I also don't mind if there's elements that show what time period it's from. Never really an issue for me in a movie.
  • edited October 2016 Posts: 11,189
    I think most of the films look "of their time" be that in the colour, the costumes or the sets.

    The 60s films have aged but in a good way. While some of the comments, costumes and sets "look" very "swinging 60s" (the Angels of Death, Pussy Galore's Flying Circus) they are still incredibly colourful and make full use of the outdoors.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,602
    CR will always be top 5, but it's being played so much on Showtime that I'm getting tired of it, same with SP on Epix. Gotta give SF a viewing here soon
  • Posts: 12,523
    CR will always be top 5, but it's being played so much on Showtime that I'm getting tired of it, same with SP on Epix. Gotta give SF a viewing here soon

    One of my favorite Craig Bond quips is when he walks over to Silva and taunts him with, "last rat standing," right before Silva falls over dead.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited October 2016 Posts: 10,592
    FoxRox wrote: »
    Been in the mood for Skyfall lately. I fondly look back on 4 years ago when I first saw it in the theater; one of my best experiences seeing a movie in the theater. Some find it overrated, but I can't imagine it falling out of favor with me. Absolutely love it.
    I feel the same way. I can't imagine this one falling in my rankings any time soon.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    Watched GE-TB-TLD-CR-LALD all today.

    About Thunderball.

    Once more I noticed how incredibly dull the first 45 minutes are. Even my brothers-in-arms started talking and getting restless on the sofa and chairs after 20 minutes.

    But from minute 45 when Bond arrives in Nassau to 1:45 Thunderball is GOLD.

    Maybe even the best one hour of the whole Connery era.

    Sadly the underwater fight, as epic and well done as it may seem, is one more time too many underwater, especially as the whole sequence plays almost 15 minutes, it's dragging.
    The finale on the speeding boat, sped-up film really (what a shame) is rather short in comparison.
    I do like the death scene or Largo immensely though, this was done brilliantly. One of my favourite kills of the whole series.

    Overall TB just can't be compared to the perfect trilogy that is DN-FRWL-GF, it just isn't up to that overall quality.

    Sadly it is one of the very few Bond films I feel about that way. So it will never escape my bottom five I guess, even if it is a fantastic movie by any standard really.
    But it's Bond, and I can only compare it to other Bond films.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited November 2016 Posts: 8,454
    Personally I love the scenes at shrublands, although I have to admit the whole Deval double plot device is needlessly convoluted. The scene where the motorbike blows up the car seems inserted into the film merely to tie up a loose end and little else. Oh, It's also a reason to have an explosion, of course.
  • BondJasonBond006BondJasonBond006 on fb and ajb
    Posts: 9,020
    NSNA's first 45 minutes (incidentally it takes the exact amount of time to get to Nassau) are much better than TB's I'm afraid to say. Time flies with NSNA and it's so funny. TB is just dull and even visually quite unattractive which changes dramatically once in Nassau.
    It's almost like they switched directors after 45 minutes.

    The story though is great, always liked it and it's the one thing that keeps my interest when watching TB before it finally goes to the wonderful holiday resort.
  • Posts: 16,226
    CR actually begins to suffer from age. Never thought it could happen but it does.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    I liked SP a lot more on my most recent viewing. I actually am feeling it may hold up better than CR in the future. Right now CR seems to me like a mixture of trendy 2006 cell phones, a film piggybacking on the 2006 reboot trend, a wee bit of the Fleming novel, and a ton of extraneous terrorist subplots and airport action scenes- all of which adds to a film that is feeling very little like Bond film. Solid as a thriller, but one I'm lately not popping in or getting all the way thru.

    I feel the same way now.
    I am convinced it'll slip considerably in people's rankings in the next 10 years to a lower Top 10 spot.

    It'll join GE somewhere in the middle.
    But it will remain everyone's favourite of this era.

    Personally I am shocked that it actually might go down in my ranking. For 10 years it was firmly set No 4 after GE TLD and OHMSS, but now I am not sure anymore.

    I find I tend to lose interest shortly after the parkour/crane chase in the first half. To me it feels the first half is padding to get to the casino match. None of which was in the novel. The airport scene I don't much care for. You can find similar scenes in any typical '90s action flick. I still love the casino sequences, though I think baccarat might have made CR more timeless then the then popular Texas Hold em.
    I suppose the freshness of CR wore off for me whereas something like TLD is still as immensely enjoyable for me as it was that hot summer day I caught the first matinee in 1987.
Sign In or Register to comment.