Last Bond Movie You Watched

1284285287289290332

Comments

  • Posts: 17,753
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.
  • Lancaster007Lancaster007 Shrublands Health Clinic, England
    Posts: 1,874
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.

    With a pull-out garrotte? That would be useful…
  • Posts: 17,753
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.

    With a pull-out garrotte? That would be useful…

    Huh?
  • Posts: 19,339
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.

    With a pull-out garrotte? That would be useful…

    Huh?

    As per Grant,FRWL,Torg...wake up boy !! ;)
  • Posts: 4,044
    If people are that bored with a movie they should just go home. They can tweet to their heart’s content there without ruining the movie for everyone else.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    barryt007 wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.

    With a pull-out garrotte? That would be useful…

    Huh?

    As per Grant,FRWL,Torg...wake up boy !! ;)

    He is just playing innocent.
  • edited April 2018 Posts: 17,753
    barryt007 wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    SPECTRE

    The L'Americain sequence drags on as does the torture bit.
    It's true that L'Americain drags, but I think it's one of the better scenes in the film. I have mentioned this before, but in the theatre on my second viewing the phones lit up like crazy during this sequence, indicating that audiences were tuning out in a big way.

    The torture certainly drags on and was quite gratuitous in my view.
    ToTheRight wrote: »
    Someone like Glen probably would have fixed the gunbarrel, removing the pretentious "Dead are alive" bulls**t and opened on the skull eye socket as per the script. I have no doubt he would have cut the brothergate dialogue out altogether therefore making it an interesting trivia on an idiotic idea that may have occurred (a'la the DR. NO monkey) had good sense not prevailed.
    I also think Glen would have inserted a pigeon somewhere. But, hey, I'll take that over brothergate any day.
    Glen would have certainly cleaned it up quite a bit.

    Mendes did do the 'bird tribute' at White's home though.

    That's right!! Good catch on the pigeon. I think the audiences had their phones out during "L'Americain" when I saw it as well.

    Seriously? WTF is wrong with people. Not only can they not sit down for 2 or so hours without stuffing their faces with god-awful popcorn, they can't leave their precious smartphone alone while watching a film! Jesus-H-Christ. I love going to the cinema, but viewing at home is a lot less stressful!

    I agree. It's obnoxious to see the lit up smart phones in the cinema after the lights go down. I always envision Clint Eastwood snatching one from someone, grabbing them and doing his "Listen, punk. To me you're nothing but dogs**t" speech from Sudden Impact.
    I pretty stopped going to the movies some time back. It's just fun fun anymore.

    I don't go to the movies anymore. Only rare occasions like a new Bond film can make going to the cinema worth it. I'll happily wait the extra 4-5 months until a film is available for purchase.

    In the case of SP I can't blame people as much for checking their smartphones. Even I had to check more than once how much more was left of the film - on my wristwatch, of course.

    With a pull-out garrotte? That would be useful…

    Huh?

    As per Grant,FRWL,Torg...wake up boy !! ;)

    He is just playing innocent.

    :))
    To be honest, I didn't catch that one. I blame the sudden warmer weather!
  • Posts: 230
    TWINE. Still a guilty pleasure.
  • Keeping the Spectre roll going, I watched it last night, in belated celebration of Daniel Craig's birthday (and I suppose more timely celebration of his and Rachel's kid on the way).

    My broader theory on the movie still holds up, which is that it's a doubly-failed attempt to hit the perfect balance between questioning and exemplifying the traditional elements of Bond. GoldenEye, Casino Royale, and Skyfall succeeded because they were compelling spy capers with thrilling setpieces and cutting one-liners that still made you wonder what made Bond tick and why he lived such a miserable life.

    Spectre, on the other hand, has a languid plot and leans too hard on the jokes, and the attempts to make it deep are obviously tacked on and never cohere into a central thesis, or even an interesting question. M thinks that surveillance is bad, if it's overused, Madeline protests that Bond has a choice to continue in this life, whatever that could mean, and Bond briefly feels wistful about Vesper and M.

    And then there's the attempt to make Craig's movie into a cohesive whole, which is perfectly fine in theory (it's where CR and Quantum of Solace were clearly going) but downright offensive in practice. Who thought Silva needed to be involved? And who on Earth thought "Blofeld is mad that Bond got too much of his dad's attention?" was a compelling motive? Who?! That, more than the flat jokes and halfhearted attempts at depth, sinks the movie.

    The actual plot of the movie, beyond Blofeld's ridiculous quest for revenge, is a mess. They knew that Bond just chasing Blofeld off a random tip wasn't up to snuff and any Bond needs an evil plot, but they chose one that was almost completely unconnected to the rest of the story and is resolved, therefore, completely separately from the conflict between Bond and Blofeld.

    C (I still don't get that joke (the name, not M calling him a c**t)) gets only the teeniest bit of characterization, when he insults democracy (see the bit about depth above) and has apparently formed a tactical alliance with Blofeld. Surely they would turn on each other when Nine Eyes is activated, that might have been an interesting plot to explore. And the buildup of Nine Eyes (the attack, the vote, the home secretary shuttering the 00 program) happens almost entirely off screen and is defeated solely through dramatic typing on the part of Q. That's quite the mess they got themselves into.

    But that's enough criticism for right now, let's talk about the positives. The movie has quite a few great individual scenes. The PTS is a rollicking bit of action, and the Day of the Dead parade is a wonderful use of local culture in the Bondian tradition. The Spectre meeting in Rome is creepy as only Bond can be, and the car chase is pure class (a couple of the jokes there are dumb, but I can let them slide). Bond's confrontation with Mr. White is the only time the movie actually approaches genuine insight, perhaps because it has the weight of CR and QoS to lean on. I also enjoyed Bond chasing Hinx down with his plane, which admittedly doesn't make much sense. For that, I refer you to half the other action sequences in this wonderful series. The fight on the train with Hinx is even better, and the torture sequence would be compelling in just about any other circumstance.

    The flashes of brilliance it shows, and quality performances from just about all the main cast, is enough to keep SP out of the bottom tier. But it's sadly too flawed to move anywhere beyond the mediocre, stuck in there with Live and Let Die, Octopussy, and The World is Not Enough. Here's to a better fifth for Daniel Craig, though history gives us a pretty mixed bag.
  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    Posts: 5,185
    I Agree with all your points. It really is a mixed bag of a movie. In Terms of productiin value they were firing on all cylinders, and there is greatness in there somewhere but ultimately it collapsed under its own weight.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    edited April 2018 Posts: 11,139
    Birdleson wrote: »
    If it wasn't for GF, FRWL and OHMSS, I'd agree.

    Add DN, TB and GE to that list.

    Rewatched SF yesterday and its mediocrity shone through with overwhelming effect. It's nowhere near as offensive as SP though.
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    Both showings of Moonraker on itv4.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    @doubleoego -- did you ever like SF? Or is this something that developed over re-watches?
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    I guess I've always tolerated SF rather than love or dislike it but over the years it's flaws have become aggressively more apparent.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2018 Posts: 23,883
    SP

    I decided to revisit this on account of my recent 4K TV & player purchase. It's still an unmitigated disaster imho (and I still switched it off after the gratuitous torture sequence as I normally do, to spare myself the torture of London), but a few things stood out in upscaled format.

    -Thomas Newman's score has a lot of detail in it which I had not heard before and which made it sound better in this format.

    -The production qualities are generally top notch apart from the piss filter and occasionally very shoddy CGI. In certain places, the film looks as good as the best of them. The money is definitely up there on the screen.

    -Daniel Craig looks pretty old even here in upscaled high def. In some sequences he honestly looks like death (I'm thinking in particular of the part in the snow where he tries to restrain Madeleine after the plane/car crash). I shudder to think what it's going to be like almost two years from now. Makeup is going to have to earn its keep.

    -One of the scenes which really stood out this time was the Hinx/Bond train fight. I realized now why, among other things, this sequence has never worked for me. In the other train fights (FRWL, LALD & TSWLM), Bond and his opponent fight in the cabin itself. Therefore it's more plausible and understandable when, after dispatching his foe, he decides to get it on with the leading lady (at least in the last two films). In SP, the fight is out in the open and causes a lot of damage to the shared compartments of the train. So I guess I just expected them to have to explain that after Hinx is thrown out, rather than just being permitted to go straight to a bit of impromptu passionate nookie.

    -When the countries are voting on Nine Eyes, one would think that there would have been a more confidential mechanism so that their vote couldn't be readily seen by those sitting behind them.

    -Blofeld's control room looks really bland. It's just a series of led computer screens. A far cry from Adam's work.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,583
    Goldfinger.

    It had been quite some time since I had visited this film. I fell asleep right when Bond and Pussy are in the hay since I had just finished a 12 hour work day. I'll keep it short but it falls around my second or third favorite Connery film and just out of my top 10. Great viewing nonetheless. Connery is prime and peak Bond here.
  • Posts: 17,753
    bondjames wrote: »
    SP

    I decided to revisit this on account of my recent 4K TV & player purchase. It's still an unmitigated disaster imho (and I still switched it off after the gratuitous torture sequence as I normally do, to spare myself the torture of London), but a few things stood out in upscaled format.

    -Thomas Newman's score has a lot of detail in it which I had not heard before and which made it sound better in this format.

    -The production qualities are generally top notch apart from the piss filter and occasionally very shoddy CGI. In certain places, the film looks as good as the best of them. The money is definitely up there on the screen.

    -Daniel Craig looks pretty old even here in upscaled high def. In some sequences he honestly looks like death (I'm thinking in particular of the part in the snow where he tries to restrain Madeleine after the plane/car crash). I shudder to think what it's going to be like almost two years from now. Makeup is going to have to earn its keep.

    -One of the scenes which really stood out this time was the Hinx/Bond train fight. I realized now why, among other things, this sequence has never worked for me. In the other train fights (FRWL, LALD & TSWLM), Bond and his opponent fight in the cabin itself. Therefore it's more plausible and understandable when, after dispatching his foe, he decides to get it on with the leading lady (at least in the last two films). In SP, the fight is out in the open and causes a lot of damage to the shared compartments of the train. So I guess I just expected them to have to explain that after Hinx is thrown out, rather than just being permitted to go straight to a bit of impromptu passionate nookie.

    -When the countries are voting on Nine Eyes, one would think that there would have a more confidential mechanism so that their vote couldn't be readily seen by those sitting behind them.

    -Blofeld's control room looks really bland. It's just a series of led computer screens. A far cry from Adam's work.

    Some interesting points on SP, @bondjames.
    I've tried to find positives with this one, but have yet to find anything. Agree on the train sequence. The confined space of a single cabin worked so well in FRWL, LALD and TSWLM - and it could have been just as effective in SP.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,583
    The train fight is the best part of the movie.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Some interesting points on SP, @bondjames.
    I've tried to find positives with this one, but have yet to find anything. Agree on the train sequence. The confined space of a single cabin worked so well in FRWL, LALD and TSWLM - and it could have been just as effective in SP.
    Thanks @Torgeirtrap. Regarding the fight, I also have never liked the way they film Hinx just showing up out of the blue without any establishing shot (apart from the reflection on the martini shaker, which Bond notices). I would have preferred if Madeleine noticed him and looked surprised (even if she didn't know who he was, he is a very distinctive looking man), which alerted Bond to turn around.

    Having said that, I honestly have no doubt that Craig and Mendes made the film they wanted to make after this recent viewing. They both were involved in the process and decided to direct (in Mendes's case) and act (in Craig's case) the way they did, for better or worse. There's a consistency to the approach they both took here throughout the film.

    I think Mendes gets too much flack for this one. More than anything it is Craig who I have issues with here. If he had just given a more engaged and raw performance rather than attempting typical Bondian nonchalance (which just doesn't suit him), I think I would have enjoyed the film much more. Costume design messed up as well. As an example, he just doesn't wear that white dinner jacket like Connery and Moore did, and they shouldn't have put him in it.

    Seydoux really tries in this film, but she's terribly miscast. She just doesn't have the gravitas or grasp of English elocution to hold her scenes imho, but she's very easy on the eyes which softens the blow somewhat (perhaps this is why her role in MI:GP was mainly non-speaking). I sometimes wonder if a Nikki van der Zyl type dubbing could have helped.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,583
    I feel that Hinx showing up on the train is similar to as how we never knew how Jaws got in Anya's closet or how Necros throws the net over Bonds face on the plane.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited May 2018 Posts: 23,883
    I feel that Hinx showing up on the train is similar to as how we never knew how Jaws got in Anya's closet or how Necros throws the net over Bonds face on the plane.
    True and I don't have a problem with how he got there. It's just that I would have preferred a reaction from Madeleine as she is looking in his direction as he approaches. Bottom line (and we'll never know for sure) is I think the filmmaker's realized Seydoux's limitations during filming and modified accordingly. Like I said, very easy on the eyes and she tries, but I found her scenes to be very affected and unconvincing, particularly in comparison to the prior Craig Bond 'girls'.
  • Posts: 17,753
    I'm sure I've seen Seydoux act much better than in SP (at least in one French speaking role). I think she was miscast, too - but she - as with everyone else in SP - had next to nothing to work with. I'm wondering if poor direction is to blame, as well.
  • Last_Rat_StandingLast_Rat_Standing Long Neck Ice Cold Beer Never Broke My Heart
    Posts: 4,583
    When I went for my second viewing of SP with my dad who's a decent 007 fan, he asked me, who's the Bond girl in this one? To which I replied, you don't know her.
  • GoldenGunGoldenGun Per ora e per il momento che verrà
    edited May 2018 Posts: 7,112
    While switching channels I came across the LTK finale yesterday and after all these years it's still one hell of a spectacle. Also the fantastic 1980's ending song does the trick time and time again. I just love this film and said to my dad: "They just don't make 'em like this anymore."
  • Posts: 19,339
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    While switching channels I came across the LTK finale yesterday and after all these years it's still one hell of a spectacle. Also the fantastic 1980's ending song does the trick time and time again. I just love this film and said to my dad: "They just don't make 'em like this anymore."

    Apart from that bloody winking fish.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    While switching channels I came across the LTK finale yesterday and after all these years it's still one hell of a spectacle. Also the fantastic 1980's ending song does the trick time and time again. I just love this film and said to my dad: "They just don't make 'em like this anymore."

    One of the best finales in a Bond film. The sound design. Stunts. And yes, music (not my fave soundtrack, but Kamen shines in the climax).

    And the incompetent Babs Broccoli was in charge of co-ordinating all of the very intricate
    beats to this climax... Hmmm....
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Birdleson wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    GoldenGun wrote: »
    While switching channels I came across the LTK finale yesterday and after all these years it's still one hell of a spectacle. Also the fantastic 1980's ending song does the trick time and time again. I just love this film and said to my dad: "They just don't make 'em like this anymore."

    Apart from that bloody winking fish.

    That never bothered me. I just assumed the winking was on a timer of some kind. I never even thought it odd until I came onto this site.

    Same here, it s not as if it turned its face towards the camera and said "That s all, folks!".
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,534
    Catching the end of QOS on TV. God I love this movie.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Remington wrote: »
    Catching the end of QOS on TV. God I love this movie.

    I see you are taking after me. ;)
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    The winking fish is stupid idea and moment in the film. Yes, maybe there is a timer, but it's still a silly way to end one of the darkest Bonds in the catelogue. Probably it would fit a Roger Moore movie better.
Sign In or Register to comment.